Barrier-to-autointegration factor influences specific histone modifications

Nucleus

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 580-590

  de Oca, Rocío Montes ^a   Andreassen, Paul R ^b   Wilson, Katherine L ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Barrier to autointegration factor; Cell cycle; DNA replication; G9a; H3 K9 dimethylation; H3 S10 phosphorylation; Hutchinson gilford progeria syndrome; Lamina associated domain; Nuclear envelope; Nucleoskeleton; Nucleosome; SET I2PP2A

Indexed keywords

BARRIER TO AUTOINTEGRATION FACTOR; H3K9 METHYLTRANSFERASE; HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE; HISTONE DEACETYLASE 1; HISTONE H3; HISTONE H4; HISTONE METHYLTRANSFERASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPHOSPHORYLATION; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; GENE SILENCING; HISTONE ACETYLATION; HISTONE MODIFICATION; HISTONE PHOSPHORYLATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VIVO STUDY; NUCLEOSOME; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; REGULATOR GENE;

EID: 84856922144     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.2.6.17960     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Postnikov Y, Bustin M. Regulation of chromatin structure and function by HMGN proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010; 1799:628; PMID:19948260
2. McBryant SJ, Lu X, Hansen JC. Multifunctionality of the linker histones: an emerging role for proteinprotein interactions. Cell Res 2010; 20:519-28; PMID: 20309017; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.35
3. Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science 2001; 293:1074-80; PMID:11498575; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1063127
4. Berger SL. The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription. Nature 2007; 447: 407-12; PMID:17522673; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05915
5. Lachner M, O'Carroll D, Rea S, Mechtler K, Jenuwein T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 2001; 410:116-20; PMID:11242053; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35065132
6. Nowak SJ, Corces VG. Phosphorylation of histone H3: a balancing act between chromosome condensation and transcriptional activation. Trends Genet 2004; 20:214-20; PMID:15041176; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2004.02.007
7. Dechat T, Pfleghaar K, Sengupta K, Shimi T, Shumaker DK, Solimando L, et al. Nuclear lamins: major factors in the structural organization and function of the nucleus and chromatin. Genes Dev 2008; 22:832-53; PMID:18381888; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1652708
8. Wilson KL, Berk JM. The nuclear envelope at a glance. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:1973-8; PMID:20519579; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.019042
9. Simon DN, Wilson KL. The nucleoskeleton as a genome-associated dynamic 'network of networks'. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12:695-708; PMID: 21971041; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3207
10. Pickersgill H, Kalverda B, de Wit E, Talhout W, Fornerod M, van Steensel B. Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nat Genet 2006; 38:1005-14; PMID:16878134; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1852
11. Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, Meuleman W, Faza MB, Talhout W, et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008; 453:948-51; PMID: 18463634; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06947
12. Peric-Hupkes D, Meuleman W, Pagie L, Bruggeman SW, Solovei I, Brugman W, et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 2010; 38:603-13; PMID:20513434; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016
13. Meister P, Towbin BD, Pike BL, Ponti A, Gasser SM. The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. Genes Dev 2010; 24:766-82; PMID:20395364; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.559610
14. Wilson KL, Foisner R. Lamin-binding Proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2:a000554; PMID: 20452940; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000554
15. Prokocimer M, Davidovich M, Nissim-Rafinia M, Wiesel-Motiuk N, Bar D, Barkan R, Meshorer E, Gruenbaum Y. Nuclear lamins: key regulators of nuclear structure and activities. J Cell Mol Med 2009; 13:105985; PMID:19210577; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00676.x
16. Worman HJ, Fong LG, Muchir A, Young SG. Laminopathies and the long strange trip from basic cell biology to therapy. J Clin Invest 2009; 119:1825-36; PMID: 19587457; http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI37679
17. Sabatelli P, Lattanzi G, Ognibene A, Columbaro M, Capanni C, Merlini L, et al. Nuclear alterations in autosomal-dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24:826-9; PMID:11360268; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.1076
18. Goldman RD, Shumaker DK, Erdos MR, Eriksson M, Goldman AE, Gordon LB, et al. Accumulation of mutant lamin A causes progressive changes in nuclear architecture in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:8963-8; PMID: 15184648; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402943101
19. Columbaro M, Capanni C, Mattioli E, Novelli G, Parnaik VK, Squarzoni S, et al. Rescue of heterochromatin organization in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria by drug treatment. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005; 62:2669-78; PMID:16261260; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5318-6
20. Scaffidi P, Misteli T. Reversal of the cellular phenotype in the premature aging disease Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Nat Med 2005; 11:440-5; PMID: 15750600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm1204
21. Filesi I, Gullotta F, Lattanzi G, D'Apice MR, Capanni C, Nardone AM, et al. Alterations of nuclear envelope and chromatin organization in mandibuloacral dysplasia, a rare form of laminopathy. Physiol Genomics 2005; 23:150-8; PMID:16046620; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00060.2005
22. Shumaker DK, Dechat T, Kohlmaier A, Adam SA, Bozovsky MR, Erdos MR, et al. Mutant nuclear lamin A leads to progressive alterations of epigenetic control in premature aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:8703-8; PMID:16738054; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602569103
23. Margalit A, Brachner A, Gotzmann J, Foisner R, Gruenbaum Y. Barrier-to-autointegration factor-a BAFfling little protein. Trends Cell Biol 2007; 17: 202-8; PMID:17320395; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2007.02.004
24. Haraguchi T, Koujin T, Segura-Totten M, Lee KK, Matsuoka Y, Yoneda Y, et al. BAF is required for emerin assembly into the reforming nuclear envelope. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:4575-85; PMID:11792822
25. Liu J, Lee KK, Segura-Totten M, Neufeld E, Wilson KL, Gruenbaum Y. MAN1 and emerin have overlapping function(s) essential for chromosome segregation and cell division in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:4598-603; PMID:12684533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0730821100
26. Furukawa K, Sugiyama S, Osouda S, Goto H, Inagaki M, Horigome T, et al. Barrier-to-autointegration factor plays crucial roles in cell cycle progression and nuclear organization in Drosophila. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:3811-23; PMID:12902403; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00682
27. Margalit A, Segura-Totten M, Gruenbaum Y, Wilson KL. Barrier-to-autointegration factor is required to segregate and enclose chromosomes within the nuclear envelope and assemble the nuclear lamina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:3290-5; PMID:15728376; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408364102
28. Gorjánácz M, Klerkx EP, Galy V, Santarella R, Lopez-Iglesias C, Askjaer P, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans BAF-1 and its kinase VRK-1 participate directly in post-mitotic nuclear envelope assembly. EMBO J 2007; 26:132-43; PMID:17170708; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601470
29. Haraguchi T, Kojidani T, Koujin T, Shimi T, Osakada H, Mori C, et al. Live cell imaging and electron microscopy reveal dynamic processes of BAF-directed nuclear envelope assembly. J Cell Sci 2008; 121:2540-54; PMID:18628300; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.033597
30. Reddy KL, Zullo JM, Bertolino E, Singh H. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 2008; 452:243-7; PMID:18272965; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06727
31. Jiang X, Xia L, Chen D, Yang Y, Huang H, Yang L, et al. Otefin, a nuclear membrane protein, determines the fate of germline stem cells in Drosophila via interaction with Smad complexes. Dev Cell 2008; 14:494-506; PMID:18410727; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.018
32. Towbin BD, Meister P, Pike BL, Gasser SM. Repetitive transgenes in C. elegans accumulate heterochromatic marks and are sequestered at the nuclear envelope in a copy-number- and lamin-dependent manner. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010; 75:555-65; PMID:21467137; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.041
33. Holaska JM, Lee KK, Kowalski AK, Wilson KL. Transcriptional repressor germ cell-less (GCL) and barrier to autointegration factor (BAF) compete for binding to emerin in vitro. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:6969-75; PMID:12493765; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M208811200
34. Shimi T, Koujin T, Segura-Totten M, Wilson KL, Haraguchi T, Hiraoka Y. Dynamic interaction between BAF and emerin revealed by FRAP, FLIP and FRET analyses in living HeLa cells. J Struct Biol 2004; 147:31-41; PMID:15109603; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2003.11.013
35. Margalit A, Neufeld E, Feinstein N, Wilson KL, Podbilewicz B, Gruenbaum Y. Barrier to autointegration factor blocks premature cell fusion and maintains adult muscle integrity in C. elegans. J Cell Biol 2007; 178:661-73; PMID:17698609; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200704049
36. Zheng R, Ghirlando R, Lee MS, Mizuuchi K, Krause M, Craigie R. Barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF) bridges DNA in a discrete, higher-order nucleoprotein complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:8997-9002; PMID:10908652; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.150240197
37. Bradley CM, Ronning DR, Ghirlando R, Craigie R, Dyda F. Structural basis for DNA bridging by barrierto-autointegration factor. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12:935-6; PMID:16155580; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb989
38. Skoko D, Li M, Huang Y, Mizuuchi M, Cai M, Bradley CM, et al. Barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF) condenses DNA by looping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:16610-5; PMID:19805345; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909077106
39. Segura-Totten M, Kowalski AK, Craigie R, Wilson KL. Barrier-to-autointegration factor: major roles in chromatin decondensation and nuclear assembly. J Cell Biol 2002; 158:475-85; PMID:12163470; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200202019
40. Wang X, Xu S, Rivolta C, Li LY, Peng GH, Swain PK, et al. Barrier to autointegration factor interacts with the cone-rod homeobox and represses its transactivation function. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:43288-300; PMID: 12215455; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M207952200
41. Montes de Oca R, Lee KK, Wilson KL. Binding of barrier to autointegration factor (BAF) to histone H3 and selected linker histones including H1.1. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:42252-62; PMID:16203725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509917200
42. Montes de Oca R, Shoemaker CJ, Gucek M, Cole RN, Wilson KL. Barrier-to-autointegration factor proteome reveals chromatin-regulatory partners. PLoS ONE 2009; 4:e7050; PMID:19759913; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007050
43. Cox JL, Mallanna SK, Ormsbee BD, Desler M, Wiebe MS, Rizzino A. Banf1 is required to maintain the selfrenewal of both mouse and human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 2011; 124:2654-65; PMID:21750191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.083238
44. Puente XS, Quesada V, Osorio FG, Cabanillas R, Cadinanos J, Fraile JM, et al. Exome sequencing and functional analysis identifies BANF1 mutation as the cause of a hereditary progeroid syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2011; 88:650-6; PMID:21549337; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.010
45. Park YJ, Luger K. Histone chaperones in nucleosome eviction and histone exchange. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008; 18:282-9; PMID:18534842; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2008.04.003
46. Kim MY, Mauro S, Gevry N, Lis JT, Kraus WL. NAD +-dependent modulation of chromatin structure and transcription by nucleosome binding properties of PARP-1. Cell 2004; 119:803-14; PMID:15607977; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.002
47. Foltz DR, Jansen LE, Black BE, Bailey AO, Yates JR, 3rd, Cleveland DW. The human CENP-A centromeric nucleosome-associated complex. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:458-69; PMID:16622419; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1397
48. Luger K, Möder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 1997; 389:251-60; PMID:9305837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/38444
49. Umland TC, Wei S-Q, Craigie R, Davies DR. Structural Basis of DNA Bridging by Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor. Biochemistry 2000; 39:9130-8; PMID:10924106; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi000572w
50. Wiebe MS, Traktman P. Poxviral B1 kinase overcomes barrier to autointegration factor, a host defense against virus replication. Cell Host Microbe 2007; 1:187-97; PMID:18005698; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.03.007
51. Bolden JE, Peart MJ, Johnstone RW. Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006; 5:769-84; PMID:16955068; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd2133
52. Haraguchi T, Koujin T, Osakada H, Kojidani T, Mori C, Masuda H, et al. Nuclear localization of barrier-toautointegration factor is correlated with progression of S phase in human cells. J Cell Sci 2007; 120:1967-77; PMID:17519288; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03461
53. Andreassen PR, Margolis RL. Microtubule dependency of p34cdc2 inactivation and mitotic exit in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 1994; 127:789-802; PMID:7962060; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.127.3.789
54. Davis FM, Tsao TY, Fowler SK, Rao PN. Monoclonal antibodies to mitotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80:2926-30; PMID:6574461; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.80.10.2926
55. Nowak SJ, Pai CY, Corces VG. Protein phosphatase 2A activity affects histone H3 phosphorylation and transcription in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:6129-38; PMID:12917335; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.17.6129-6138.2003
56. Tachibana M, Sugimoto K, Fukushima T, Shinkai Y. Set domain-containing protein, G9a, is a novel lysinepreferring mammalian histone methyltransferase with hyperactivity and specific selectivity to lysines 9 and 27 of histone H3. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:25309-17; PMID:11316813; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M101914200
57. Taverna SD, Li H, Ruthenburg AJ, Allis CD, Patel DJ. How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:1025-40; PMID: 17984965; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1338
58. Gant TM, Harris CA, Wilson KL. Roles of LAP2 proteins in nuclear assembly and DNA replication: truncated LAP2beta proteins alter lamina assembly, envelope formation, nuclear size and DNA replication efficiency in Xenopus laevis extracts. J Cell Biol 1999; 144:1083-96; PMID:10087255; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.144.6.1083
59. Zhou J, Chau C, Deng Z, Stedman W, Lieberman PM. Epigenetic control of replication origins. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:889-92; PMID:15917669; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.4.7.1823
60. Cayrou C, Coulombe P, Mechali M. Programming DNA replication origins and chromosome organization. Chromosome Res 2010; 18:137-45; PMID:20066560; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-009-9105-3
61. Jørgensen S, Elvers I, Trelle MB, Menzel T, Eskildsen M, Jensen ON, et al. The histone methyltransferase SET8 is required for S-phase progression. J Cell Biol 2007; 179:1337-45; PMID:18166648; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200706150
62. Tardat M, Murr R, Herceg Z, Sardet C, Julien E. PRSet7-dependent lysine methylation ensures genome replication and stability through S phase. J Cell Biol 2007; 179:1413-26; PMID:18158331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200706179
63. Li G, Sudlow G, Belmont AS. Interphase cell cycle dynamics of a late-replicating, heterochromatic homogeneously staining region: precise choreography of condensation/decondensation and nuclear positioning. J Cell Biol 1998; 140:975-89; PMID:9490713; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.140.5.975
64. Widrow RJ, Hansen RS, Kawame H, Gartler SM, Laird CD. Very late DNA replication in the human cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:11246-50; PMID:9736721; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.19.11246
65. Herrera JE, West KL, Schiltz RL, Nakatani Y, Bustin M. Histone H1 is a specific repressor of core histone acetylation in chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:523-9; PMID:10611231; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.2.523-529.2000
66. Lim JH, West KL, Rubinstein Y, Bergel M, Postnikov YV, Bustin M. Chromosomal protein HMGN1 enhances the acetylation of lysine 14 in histone H3. EMBO J 2005; 24:3038-48; PMID:16096646; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600768
67. Ueda T, Postnikov YV, Bustin M. Distinct domains in high mobility group N variants modulate specific chromatin modifications. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 10182-7; PMID:16484217; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M600821200
68. Collins RE, Northrop JP, Horton JR, Lee DY, Zhang X, Stallcup MR, et al. The ankyrin repeats of G9a and GLP histone methyltransferases are mono- and dimethyllysine binding modules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2008; 15:245-50; PMID:18264113; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1384
69. Rai K, Jafri IF, Chidester S, James SR, Karpf AR, Cairns BR, et al. Dnmt3 and G9a cooperate for tissuespecific development in zebrafish. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:4110-21; PMID:19946145; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.073676
70. Mamada H, Takahashi N, Taira M. Involvement of an inner nuclear membrane protein, Nemp1, in Xenopus neural development through an interaction with the chromatin protein BAF. Dev Biol 2009; 327:497-507; PMID:19167377; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.12.038
71. Wen B, Wu H, Shinkai Y, Irizarry RA, Feinberg AP. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2009; 41:246-50; PMID:19151716; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.297
72. Sims RJ, 3rd, Nishioka K, Reinberg D. Histone lysine methylation: a signature for chromatin function. Trends Genet 2003; 19:629-39; PMID:14585615; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2003.09.007
73. Steger DJ, Lefterova MI, Ying L, Stonestrom AJ, Schupp M, Zhuo D, et al. DOT1L/KMT4 recruitment and H3K79 methylation are ubiquitously coupled with gene transcription in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:2825-39; PMID:18285465; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02076-07
74. Pegoraro G, Kubben N, Wickert U, Gohler H, Hoffmann K, Misteli T. Ageing-related chromatin defects through loss of the NURD complex. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:1261-7; PMID:19734887; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1971
75. Delbarre E, Tramier M, Coppey-Moisan M, Gaillard C, Courvalin JC, Buendia B. The truncated prelamin A in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome alters segregation of A-type and B-type lamin homopolymers. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15:1113-22; PMID: 16481358; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddl026
76. Bengtsson L, Wilson KL. Barrier-to-autointegration factor phosphorylation on Ser-4 regulates emerin binding to lamin A in vitro and emerin localization in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:1154-63; PMID:16371512; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0356
77. Clayton AL, Rose S, Barratt MJ, Mahadevan LC. Phosphoacetylation of histone H3 on c-fos- and c-junassociated nucleosomes upon gene activation. EMBO J 2000; 19:3714-26; PMID:10899125; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.14.3714
78. Wang AH, Bertos NR, Vezmar M, Pelletier N, Crosato M, Heng HH, et al. HDAC4, a human histone deacetylase related to yeast HDA1, is a transcriptional corepressor. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:7816-27; PMID: 10523670
79. Andreassen PR, Skoufias DA, Margolis RL. Analysis of the spindle-assembly checkpoint in HeLa cells. Methods Mol Biol 2004; 281:213-25; PMID:15220532