Pre-service teachers' perceptions of the benefits of peer review

Journal of Education for Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 37-49

  Buchanan, Michael T ^a   Stern, Julian ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b YORK ST JOHN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Australia; dialogue; learning community; peer review

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856852839     PISSN: 02607476     EISSN: 13600540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2012.643654     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Akerlind, G.S. and Pettigrove, M.G. 1996. Peer review and self-evaluation: A toolkit-resource booklet for the improvement of teaching and learning, Canberra: ANU.
2. Alexander, R.J. 2004. Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk, Thirsk: Dialogos.
3. Alexander, R.J. 2006. Education as dialogue: Moral and pedagogical choices for a runaway world, Thirsk: Hong Kong Institute of Education with Dialogos.
4. ter Avest, I., Jozsa, D.-P., Knauth, T., Rosón, J. and Skeie, G., eds. 2009. Dialogue and conflict on religion: Studies of classroom interaction in European countries, Münster: Waxmann.
5. Bates, R. 2002. Australian teacher education: Some background observations. Journal of Education for Teaching, 28: 217-20.
6. Bell, M. 2005. Peer observation partnership in higher education, Milperra, NSW: Herdsa.
7. Bernstein, D.J. 2008. Peer review and the intellectual work of teaching. Change, 40: 48-51.
8. van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W. and Pilot, A. 2006a. Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31: 341-56.
9. van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W. and Pilot, A. 2006b. Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 11: 135-47.
10. Bilmes, J. 1975. Misinformation in verbal accounts: Some fundamental considerations. Man, 10: 60-71.
11. Bindley, C. and Scoffield, S. 1998. Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3: 79-89.
12. Buber, M. 1947, 1965, 2002. Between man and man. Trans. Ronald Gregor Smith. London: Routledge.
13. Buber, M. 1965, 1998. The knowledge of man: Selected essays. Trans. Maurice Friedman and Ronald Gregor Smith. New York: Humanity Books.
14. Caswell, M. 2001. Teaching scripture: The gospel of Mark, Pymble, NSW: HarperCollins.
15. Crotty, M. 1998. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process, St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
16. Daniels, H., ed. 1996. An introduction to Vygotsky, London: Routledge.
17. Daniels, H. 2001. Vygotsky and pedagogy, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
18. De Bono, E. 2006. De Bono's thinking course, Harlow: BBC.
19. Ellis, V. 2010. Impoverishing experience: The problem of teacher education in England. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36: 105-20.
20. Glaser, B. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
21. Glaser, B. 1992. Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence v forcing, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
22. Glaser, B. 1998. Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
23. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, New York: Adeline.
24. Goulding, C. 2002. Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers, London: Sage.
25. Ipgrave, J. 2009. The language of friendship and identity: Children's communication choices in an interfaith exchange. British Journal of Religious Education, 31: 213-25.
26. Johnson, N. 1996. Becoming learning communities. Learning Matters, 1: 7-11.
27. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lipman, M. 2003. Thinking in education, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Malone, D.M., and J.J. Riggsbee. 2007. Supporting pre-service teachers through peer mentoring programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New York, NY. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p142073_index.html.
30. McGrath, H. and Noble, T. 2005. Eight ways at once, Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
31. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Salmon, P. 1995. Psychology in the classroom: Reconstructing teachers and learners, London: Cassell.
33. Smith, H., Cooper, A. and Lancaster, L. 2002. Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations for Education and Teaching International, 39: 71-8.
34. Stern, L.J. 2009. Monologue or dialogue? Stepping away from the abyss in higher education. London Review of Education, 7: 271-81.
35. Stern, L.J. 2010. Research as pedagogy: Building learning communities and religious understanding in RE. British Journal of Religious Education, 32: 133-46.
36. Sullivan, P. 2002. Issues and directions in Australian teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 28: 221-6.
37. Topping, K. 1998. PA between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68: 249-76.
38. Topping, K.J. 2010. Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20: 339-43.
39. Van Weert, T.J. and Pilot, A. 2003. Task-based team learning with ICT, design and development of new learning. Education and Information Technologies, 8: 195-214.
40. Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. and Van Merrienboer, J. 2010. Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20: 270-9.
41. Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Wager, E., Godlee, F. and Jefferson, T. 2002. How to survive peer review, London: BMJ Books.
43. Wen, M.L., Tsai, C. and Chang, C. 2006. Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43: 83-92.
44. Wilson, S.D. 2006. Peer review assignments. Teaching Philosophy, 29: 327-42.