Sea urchin: From plague to market opportunity

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 46-56

  Grisolía, José M ^a   López, Francisco ^a   Ortúzar, Juan de Dios ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Discrete choice models; Efficient experimental design; Food choices; Mixed data analysis; Sea urchin meat

Indexed keywords

DIADEMA ANTILLARUM; ECHINOIDEA;

EID: 84856769318     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson J.L., Bettencourt S. A conjoint approach to model product preferences: The New England market for fresh and frozen salmon. Marine Resource Economics 1993, 8:31-49.
2. Armstrong P., Garrido R., Ortúzar J.de D. Confidence intervals to bound the value of time. Transportation Research 2001, 37E:143-161.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. E., & Morikawa, T. (1990). Estimation of travel demand models from multiple data sources. In Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on transportation and traffic theory, Yokohama, Japan.
4. Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principle of morals and legislations. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Bierlaire, M. (2009). Estimation of discrete choice models with BIOGEME 1.8. Transport and Mobility Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Féderale de Laussane, Zürich http://transp-or2.epfl.ch/.
6. Bliemer M.C.J., Rose J.M. Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations. Transportation Research 2010, 44B:720-734.
7. Bredahl L., Grunerta K.G., Fertin C. Relating consumer perceptions of pork quality to physical product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 21:273-281.
8. Caussade S., Ortúzar J.de D., Rizzi L.I., Hensher D.A. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. Transportation Research 2005, 39B:621-640.
9. Cerjak M., Haas R., Kovacic D. Brand familiarity and tasting in conjoint analysis: An experimental study with Croatian beer consumers. British Food Journal 2010, 112:561-579.
10. Dasgupta S., Eaton J., Caporelli A. Consumer perceptions of freshwater prawns: Results from a Kentucky farmers' market. Journal of Shellfish Research 2010, 29:19-23.
11. Enneking U., Neumann C., Henneber S. How important intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes affect purchase decision. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:133-138.
12. Fotopoulosa C., Krystallis A., Vassalloc M., Pagiaslis A. Food choice questionnaire (fcq) revisited: Suggestions for the development of an enhanced general food motivation model. Appetite 2008, 52:199-208.
13. Fujiwara A., Sugie Y. Temporal stability of stated preference data. Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change 1997, 257-277. Elsevier Science, Oxford. P.R. Stopher, M.E. Lee-Gosselin (Eds.).
14. Furst T., Connors M., Bisogni C.A., Sobal J., Falk L.W. Food choice: A conceptual model of the process. Appetite 1996, 26:247-266.
15. Glimcher P.W. Decisions, uncertainty and the brain: The science of neuroeconomics 2003, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Grisolía J.M., Willis K.G. An evening at the theatre: Using choice experiments to model preferences for theatres and theatrical productions. Applied Economics 2010, 10.1080/00036841003742637.
17. Grunert K.G. Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2003, 32:369-391.
18. Haaijer R., Kamakura W., Wedel M. The 'no-choice' alternative in conjoint choice experiments. International Journal of Market Research 2001, 43:93-106.
19. Haddad Y., Haddad J., Olabi A., Shuayto N., Haddadd N., Toufeili I. Mapping determinants of purchase intent of concentrated yogurt (Labneh) by conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:795-802.
20. Halbrendt C.K., Wang Q., Fraiz C., O'Dierno L. Marketing problems and opportunities in Mid-Atlantic seafood retailing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1995, 77:1313-1318.
21. Halbrendt C.K., Wirth F.F., Vaughn G.F. Conjoint analysis of the Mid-Atlantic food-fish market for farm-raised hybrid striped bass. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 1991, 23:155-163.
22. Harrison R.W., Stringer T., Prinyawiwatkul W. An analysis of consumer preferences for value-added seafood products derived from crawfish. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2002, 31:157-170.
23. Hensher D.A., Battellino H.C., Gee J.L. The role of stated preferences and discrete choice models in identifying community preferences for traffic management devices. Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change 1997, 233-256. Pergamon Press, Oxford. P.R. Stopher, M.E. Lee-Gosselin (Eds.).
24. Hicks J.R., Allen R.G.D. A reconsideration of the theory of value. Economica 1934, 1:52-76.
25. Hill, J. I., Nelson, R. G., Woods-Williams, K. L., Weese, S. J., & Whitis, G.N. (2006). Conjoint analysis of breaded catfish nuggets: Consumer preferences for price, product colour, cooking method and country of origin. In Southern agricultural economics association annual meeting, Dallas, TX, USA, February 2-6, p. 200.
26. Holland D., Wessells C.R. Predicting consumer preferences for fresh salmon: The influence of safety inspection and production method attributes. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 1998, 27:1-14.
27. Jaeger S., Rose J.M. Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: A case study. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:539-564.
28. Kahneman D., Sugden R. Experienced utility as a standard of policy design. Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 32:161-181.
29. Kahneman D., Wakker P.P., Sarin R. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1997, 112:375-405.
30. Kerr G.N., Sharp B.M.H. Choice experiment adaptive design benefits: A case study. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2010, 54:407-420.
31. Kozup J.C., Creyer E.H., Burton S. Making healthful food choices: The influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumer evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. Journal of Marketing 2003, 67:19-34.
32. Lancaster K.J. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 1966, 74:132-157.
33. Lange C., Issanchou S., Combris P. Expected versus experienced quality: Trade-off with price. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:289-297.
34. Lessios H.A. Diadema antillarum populations in Panama twenty years following mass mortality. Coral Reefs 2005, 24:125-127.
35. Lessios H.A., Robertson D.R., Cubit J.D. Spread of Diadema mass mortality through the Caribbean. Science 1984, 226:335-337.
36. Levitan D.R. Algal-urchin biomass responses following mass mortality of Diadema antillarum phillipi at St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 1988, 119:167-178.
37. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. McFadden D.L. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Frontiers in econometrics 1974, Academic Press, New York. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
39. Mela D.J. Determinants of food choice: Relationships with obesity and weight control. Obesity Research 2001, 9:249-255.
40. Miller R.J., Colodey A.G. Widespread mass mortalities of the green sea urchin in Nova Scotia, Canada. Marine Biology 1983, 73:263-267.
41. Morewedge C.K., Gilbert D.T., Myrseth K.O.R., Timothy D., Wilson K.S.K. Consuming experience: Why affective forecasters overestimate comparative value. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:986-992.
42. Mueller S., Osidacz P., Francis I.L., Lockshin L. Combining discrete choice and informed sensory testing in a two-stage process: Can it predict wine market share?. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:741-754.
43. Olesen I., Alfnes F., Røra M.B., Kolstad K. Eliciting consumers' willingness to pay for organic and welfare-labelled salmon in a non-hypothetical choice experiment. Livestock Science 2010, 127:218-226.
44. Ortúzar J.de D. Estimating individual preferences with flexible discrete choice models. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:262-269.
45. Ortúzar J.de D., Willumsen L.G. Modelling transport 2011, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 4th ed.
46. Palma M.A., Wirth F.F., Adams C.M., Degnerc R.L. Market preferences toward farm-raised sturgeon in the South United States: A conjoint analysis. Aquaculture Economics and Management 2010, 14:235-253.
47. Portillo, A., González, M. N., & López, H. (2000). Estudio de la Plaga de Erizos Diadema Antillarum en Aguas del Archipiélago Canario. Final Report, Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
48. Poulsen C.S., Juhl H.J., Kristensen K., Bech A.C., Engelund E. Quality guidance and quality formation. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7:127-135.
49. Robson A., Samuelson L. The evolution of decision and experienced utilities. Theoretical Economics 2011, 6:311-339.
50. Rose J.M., Bliemer M.J.C. Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transport Reviews 2009, 29:587-617.
51. Rousseas S.W., Hart A.G. Experimental verification of a composite indifference map. The Journal of Political Economy 1951, 59:288-318.
52. Scheibehenne B., Mieslera L., Toddb P.M. Fast and frugal food choices: Uncovering individual decision heuristics. Appetite 2007, 49:578-589.
53. Scheibling R.E. Increased macro algal abundance following mass mortalities of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) along the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia. Oecologia 1986, 68:186-198.
54. Sillano M., Ortúzar J.de D. Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: Some new evidence. Environment and Planning 2005, 37A:525-550.
55. Steenkamp J.B.E.M., Van Trijp H.C.M. Quality guidance: A consumer-based approach for product quality improvement. Marketing thought and practice in the 1990s 1989, 1191-1217. EMAC, Athens. G.J. Avlonitis, N.K. Papavasilliou, A.G. Kouremenos (Eds.).
56. Steptoe A., Pollard T.M. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite 1995, 25:267-285.
57. Tardiff T.J. A note on goodness-of-fit statistics for probit and logit models. Transportation 1976, 5:377-388.
58. Tempesta T., Giancristofaro R.A., Corain L., Salmaso L., Tomasi D., Boatto V. The importance of landscape in wine quality perception: An integrated approach using choice-based conjoint analysis and combination-based permutation tests. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:827-836.
59. Thurstone L.L. The indifferent function. The Journal of Social Psychology 1931, 2:139-167.
60. Train K.E. Discrete choice methods with simulation 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
61. Train K.E., Weeks M. Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space. Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics 2005, 1-16. Springer, Dordrecht. R. Scarpa, A. Alberini (Eds.).
62. Tuya F., Boyra A., Sánchez-Jerez P., Barbera C., Haroun R.J. Relationships between rocky-reef fish assemblages, the sea urchin Diadema antillarum and macro algae throughout the Canarian Archipelago. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2004, 278:157-169.
63. Walker J.L. Mixed logit (or logit kernel) model: Dispelling misconceptions of identification. Transportation Research Record 2002, 1805:86-98.
64. Wallis, W. A., & Friedman, M. (1942). The empirical derivation of indifference functions. In O. Lange, F. E. McIntyre, & T. O. Yntema (Eds.), Studies in mathematical economics and econometrics (pp. 175-189). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Wirth F.F., Love L.A., Palma M.A. Purchasing shrimp for at-home consumption: The relative importance of credence versus physical product features. Aquaculture Economics and Management 2007, 11:17-37.
66. Yañez M.F., Cherchi E., Heydecker B.G., Ortúzar J.de D. On the treatment of repeated observations in panel data: Efficiency of mixed logit parameter estimates. Networks and Spatial Economics 2011, 11:393-418.
67. Yañez M.F., Mansilla P., Ortúzar J.de D. The Santiago Panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago. Transportation 2010, 37:125-149.