Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs

Transport Reviews

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 587-617

  Rose, John M ^a   Bliemer, MIchile C J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHOD; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FORECASTING METHOD; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 70449380312     PISSN: 01441647     EISSN: 14645327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01441640902827623     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (2006) Designing stated choice experiments: state-of-the-art. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan, August 2006.
2. Bliemer, M. C. J. and Rose, J. M. (submitted) ML model paper, Transportation Research Part B.
3. Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M. and Hensher, D. A. (2009) Constructing efficient stated choice experiments allowing for differences in error variances across subsets of alternatives, Transportation Research Part B, 43(1), pp. 19-35.
4. Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G. and Hunter J. S. (1978) Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building (New York: John Wiley).
5. Bunch, D. S., Louviere, J. J. and Anderson, D. A. (1996) A comparison of experimental design strategies for multinomial logit models: the case of generic attributes. Working paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California at Davis.
6. Burgess, L. and Street, D. J. (2005) Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 134, pp. 288-301.
7. Carlsson, F. and Martinsson, P. (2002) Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics, Health Economics, 12, pp. 281-294.
8. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. (1957) Experimental Designs, 2nd edn (New York: John Wiley).
9. Ferrini, S. and Scarpa, R. (2007) Designs with a-priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice-experiments: a Monte Carlo study, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53, pp. 342-363.
10. Fowkes, A. S. (2000) Recent developments in state preference techniques in transport research, in: J. de D. Ortúzar (Ed.) Stated Preference Modelling Techniques, pp. 37-52 (London: PTRC Education and Research Services).
11. Fowkes, A. S. and Wardman, M. R. (1988) The design of stated preference travel choice experiments with particular regard to inter-personal taste variations, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, pp. 27-44.
12. Fowkes, A. S., Wardman, M. R. and Holden, D. (1993) Non-orthogonal stated preference design. Paper presented at the PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, Manchester, September 1993.
13. Galilea, P. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2005) Valuing noise level reductions in a residential location context, Transportation Research Part D, 10, pp. 305-322.
14. Hensher, D. A. and Barnard, P. O. (1990) The orthogonality issue in stated choice designs, in: M. Fischer, P. Nijkamp and Y. Papageorgiou (Eds) Spatial Choices and Processes, pp. 265-278 (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
15. Huber, J. and Zwerina, K. (1996) The importance of utility balance and efficient choice designs, Journal of Marketing Research, 33(August), pp. 307-317.
16. Johnson, F. R., Kanninen, B. J. and Bingham, M. (2006) Experimental design for stated choice studies, in: B. J. Kanninen (Ed.) Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice, pp. 159-202 (Dordrecht: Springer).
17. Kanninen, B. J. (1993a) Optimal experimental design for double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Land Economics, 69, pp. 138-146.
18. Kanninen, B. J. (1993b) Design of sequential experiments for CV studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, pp. 1-11.
19. Kanninen, B. J. (2002) Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 39(May), pp. 214-217.
20. Kessels, R., Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2006) A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), pp. 409-419.
21. Lanscar, E. and Louviere, J. J. (2006) Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Economics, 15, pp. 797-811.
22. Lanscar, E., Louviere, J. J. and Flynn, T. (2006) Several methods to investigate relative attribute impactin stated preference experiments, Social Science and Medicine, 64(8), pp. 1738-1753.
23. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
24. McFadden, D. (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, in: P. Zarembka (Ed.)Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105-142 (New York: Academic Press).
25. Rose, J. M. and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2006) Designing efficient data for stated choice: accounting for sociodemographic and contextual effects in designing stated choice experiments. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan, August 2006.
26. Rose, J. M. and Bleimer, M. C. J. (2008) Stated preference experimental design strategies, in: D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button (Eds) Handbook of Transport Modelling, Ch 8, pp. 151-180 (Oxford: Elsevier).
27. Rose, J. M. and Scarpa, R. (2008) Designs efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52(3), pp. 253-282.
28. Sándor, Z. and Wedel, M. (2001) Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers' prior beliefs, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(November), pp. 430-444.
29. Sándor, Z. and Wedel, M. (2002) Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models, Marketing Science, 21(4), pp. 455-475.
30. Sándor, Z. and Wedel, M. (2005) Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, pp. 210-218.
31. k paired comparison experiments, Communications in Statistics, Theory, and Methods, 30, pp. 2149-2171.
32. Street, D. J. and Burgess, L. (2004) Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 118, pp. 185-199.
33. Street, D. J., Burgess, L. and Louviere, J. J. (2005) Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, pp. 459-470.
34. Taguchi, G. and Konishi, S. (1987) Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs (Dearborn, MI: ASI Press).
35. Toner, J. P., Clark, S. D., Grant-Muller, S. M. and Fowkes, A. S. (1999) Anything you can do, we can do better: a provocative introduction to a new approach to stated preference design, WCTR Proceedings, Antwerp, 3, pp. 107-120.
36. Train, K. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
37. Watson, S. M., Toner, J. P., Fowkes, A. S. and Wardman, M. R. (2000) Efficiency properties of orthogonal stated preference designs, in: J. de D. Ortúzar (Ed.) Stated Preference Modelling Techniques pp. 91-101 (London: PTRC Education and Research Services).