Large-scale interventions in science education for diverse student groups in varied educational settings

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 271-280

  Lee, Okhee ^a   Krajcik, Joseph ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

diversity; equity; policy

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM PRACTICES; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; CRITICAL ISSUES; DIVERSITY; EDUCATIONAL INNOVATIONS; EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; EQUITY; NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL; NEW SCIENCE; SCALING-UP; SCIENCE EDUCATION; STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS; STUDENT GROUPS; WASHINGTON;

EDUCATION; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84856719258     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21009     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Amrein, A.L., &, Berliner, D.C., (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (18), Retrieved [2/05/09] from
2. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W., &, Soloway, E., (2000). Creating useable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35 (3), 149-164.
3. Coburn, C.E., (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32 (6), 3-12. (Pubitemid 37207529)
4. Davis, E., &, Krajcik, J., (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34 (3), 3-14. (Pubitemid 40633192)
5. Desimone, L.M., (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward a better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38 (3), 181-199.
6. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J.S., &, Soloway, E., (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 43-76. (Pubitemid 38202850)
7. Gamoran, A., Anderson, C.W., Quiroz, P.A., Secada, W.G., Williams, T., &, Ashmann, S., (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., &, Yoon, K.S., (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), 915-945. (Pubitemid 33590046)
9. Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B., &, Soloway, E., (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curriculum in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (8), 922-939.
10. Krajcik, J., McNeill, K.L., &, Reiser, B., (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with National Standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92 (1), 1-32.
11. Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., (in press) Teacher change in elementary science instruction with English language learners: Multi-year professional development intervention across multiple grades. Teachers College Record.
12. Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R.D., LeRoy, K., &, Secada, W.G., (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (1), 31-52. (Pubitemid 351189811)
13. Lee, O., Penfield, R.D., &, Maerten-Rivera, J., (2009). Effects of fidelity of implementation on science achievement gains among English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (7), 836-859.
14. Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., &, Revital, T.T., (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 1063-1080. (Pubitemid 40002957)
15. Marx, R.W., &, Harris, C.J., (2006). No Child Left Behind and science education: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. The Elementary School Journal, 106 (5), 467-477. (Pubitemid 43821075)
16. McDonald, S.-K., Keesler, V.A., Kauffman, N.J., &, Schneider, B., (2006). Scaling-up exemplary interventions. Educational Researcher, 35 (3), 15-24.
17. Moje, E., Collazo, T., Carillo, R., &, Marx, R.W., (2001). " Maestro, what is quality?": Examining competing discourses in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (4), 469-495.
18. National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
19. O'Donnell, C., (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1), 33-84.
20. Raudenbush, S.W., (2007). Designing field trials of educational innovations. In:, B. Schneider, &, S. McDonald, (Eds.), Scale up in education, vol. 2: Practice (pp. 23-40). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21. Remillard, J.T., (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75 (2), 211-246. (Pubitemid 41095778)
22. Schneider B., &, McDonald S., (Eds.), (2007a). Scale up in education, vol. 1: Ideas in principle. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
23. Schneider B., &, McDonald S., (Eds.), (2007b). Scale up in education, vol. 2: Practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24. Settlage, J., &, Meadows, L., (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (2), 114-127.
25. Southerland, S., Smith, L.K., Sowell, S.P., &, Kittleson, J.M., (2007) Resisting unlearning: Understanding science education's response to the United States' national accountability movement. In:, L. Parker, (Ed.), Review of research in education, vol. 31 (pp. 45-77). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.