Error, bias and validity in qualitative research

Educational Action Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 172-176

  Norris, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065351036     PISSN: 09650792     EISSN: 17475074     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09650799700200020     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Cook, T., and Campbell, D., 1979. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2. Elliott, J., 1990. Validating case studies. Westminster Studies in Education, 13: 47–60.
3. Evans, J., 1983. “ Criteria of Validity in Social Research: exploring the relationship between ethnographic and quantitative approaches ”. In The Ethnography of Schooling, Edited by: Hammersley, M., Driffield: Nafferton Books.
4. Lather, P., 1993. Fertile obsession: validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34: 673–693.
5. LeCompte, M., and Goetz, J., 1982. Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52: 31–60.
6. Maxwell, J., 1992. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62: 279–300.
7. Miles, M., and Huberman, M., 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis, London: Sage.
8. Phelan, P., and Reynolds, P., 1996. Evidence and Argument: critical analysis for the social sciences, London: Routledge.
9. Phillips, D. C., 1987. Validity in qualitative research: why the worry about warrant will not wane. Education and Urban Society, 20: 9–24.
10. Scheurich, J. J., The masks of validity: a deconstructive interrogation. November, New Orleans. Paper presented to the AERA annual meeting, Austin: Mimeo, Department of Educational Administration, University of Texas.
11. Scriven, M., 1981. Evaluation Thesaurus, 3rd edn, Inverness: Edgepress.
12. Yin, R. K., 1984. Case Study Research: designs and methods, London: Sage.