Fitness effects of derived deleterious mutations in four closely related wild tomato species with spatial structure

Heredity

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 189-199

  Tellier, A ^a   Fischer, I ^a   Merino, C ^a   Xia, H ^a,b   Camus Kulandaivelu, L ^a,c   Stadler T ^d   Stephan, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c CIRAD   (France)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Distribution of fitness effects; Natural selection; Population structure

Indexed keywords

UNTRANSLATED RNA;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TOMATO;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC FITNESS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RNA, UNTRANSLATED; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84856389668     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.175     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arunyawat U, Stephan W, Städler T (2007). Using multilocus sequence data to assess population structure, natural selection, and linkage disequilibrium in wild tomatoes. Mol Biol Evol 24: 2310-2322.
2. Baudry E, Kerdelhué C, Innan H, Stephan W (2001). Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics 158: 1725-1735.
3. Bierne N, Eyre-Walker A (2004). The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1350-1360.
4. Charles worth B, Morgan MT, Charles worth D (1993). The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134: 1289-1303.
5. Charles worth B, Nordborg M, Charles worth D (1997). The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genet Res Camb 70: 155-174.
6. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD (2007). The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nature Rev Genet 8: 610-618.
7. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD (2009). Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol Biol Evol 26: 2097-2108.
8. Fay JC, Wyckoff GJ, Wu Cl (2001). Positive and negative selection on the human genome. Genetics 158: 1227-1234.
9. Foil M, Gaggiotti O (2008). A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180: 977-993.
10. Fudala A, Korona R (2009). Low frequency of mutations with strongly deleterious but nonlethal fitness effects. Evolution 63: 2164-2171.
11. Gossmann TI, Song BH, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Dixon CJ, Kapralov MV et al. (2010). Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species. Mol Biol Evol 27: 1822-1832.
12. Hernandez RD (2008). A flexible forward simulator for populations subject to selection and demography. Bioinformatics 24: 2786-2787.
13. Jareborg N, Birney E, Durbin R (1999). Comparative analysis of noncoding regions of 77 orthologous mouse and human gene pairs. Genome Res 9: 815-824.
14. Ji Y, Chetelat RT (2007). GISH analysis of meiotic chromosome pairing in Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines of cultivated tomato. Genome 50: 825-833.
15. St and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17: 4015-4026.
16. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A (2007). Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies. Genetics 177: 2251-2261.
17. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A (2010). What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence data? Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond 365: 1187-1193.
18. Librado P, Rozas J (2009). DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452.
19. Martin G, Lenormand T (2006a). The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in light of fitness landscape models. Evolution 60: 2413-2427.
20. Martin G, Lenormand T (2006b). A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 60: 893-907.
21. McDonald JH, Kreitman M (1991). Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351: 652-654.
22. Nakazato T, Warren DL, Moyle LC (2010). Ecological and geographic modes of species divergence in wild tomatoes. Am J Bot 97: 680-693.
23. Nei M, Gojobori T (1986). Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3: 418-426.
24. Ohta T (1976). Role of very slightly deleterious mutations in molecular evolution and polymorphism. Theor Pop Biol 10: 254-275.
25. Olson MS, Robertson AL, Takebayashi N, Silim S, Schroeder WR, Tiffin P (2010). Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera). New Phytol 186: 526-536.
26. Pamilo P, Palsson S, Savolainen O (1999). Deleterious mutations can reduce differentiation in small, subdivided populations. Hereditas 130: 257-264.
27. Peralta IE, Spooner DM, Knapp S (2008). The taxonomy of tomatoes: a revision of wild tomatoes (Solanum section Eycopersicon) and their outgroup relatives in sections Juglan-difolium and Lycopersicoides. Syst Bot Monogr 84: 1-186.
28. Poot P, Lambers H (2008). Shallow-soil endemics: adaptive advantages and constraints of a specialized root-system morphology. New Phytol 178: 371-381.
29. R Development Core Team (2005). R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (ed.): Vienna, Austria.
30. Roselius K, Stephan W, Stadler T (2005). The relationship of nucleotide polymorphism, recombination rate and selection in wild tomato species. Genetics 171: 753-763.
31. Slotte T, Foxe JP, Hazzouri KM, Wright SI (2010). Genome-wide evidence for efficient positive and purifying selection in Capsella grandiflora, a plant species with a large effective population size. Mol Biol Evol 27: 1813-1821.
32. Städler T, Arunyawat U, Stephan W (2008). Population genetics of speciation in two closely related wild tomatoes (section Lycopersicon). Genetics 178: 339-350.
33. Städler T, Haubold B, Merino C, Stephan W, Pfaffelhuber P (2009). The impact of sampling schemes on the site frequency spectrum in nonequilibrium subdivided populations. Genetics 182: 205-216.
34. Städler T, Roselius K, Stephan W (2005). Genealogical footprints of speciation processes in wild tomatoes: demography and evidence for historical gene flow. Evolution 59: 1268-1279.
35. Stephan W, Langley CH (1998). DNA polymorphism in Lycopersicon and crossing-over per physical length. Genetics 150: 1585-1593.
36. Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002). Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160: 271-283.
37. Tajima F (1989). Statistical-method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
38. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P et al. (1992). High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141-1160.
39. Thomas BC, Rapaka L, Lyons E, Pedersen B, Freeling M (2007). Arabidopsis intragenomic conserved noncoding sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 3348-3353.
40. Whitlock MC (2003). Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics 164: 767-779.
41. Wright SI, Andolfatto P (2008). The impact of natural selection on the genome: emerging patterns in Drosophila and Arabidopsis. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39: 193-213.
42. Xia H, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Stephan W, Tellier A, Zhang Z (2010). Nucleotide diversity patterns of local adaptation at drought-related candidate genes in wild tomatoes. Mol Ecol 19: 4144-4154.
43. Yang ZH, Nielsen R (2000). Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 17: 32-43.