Developmental trait evolution in trilobites

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 314-329

  Fusco, Giuseppe ^a   Garland Jr , Theodore ^b   Hunt, Gene ^c   Hughes, Nigel C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary trends; Fossil arthropods; Growth; Molt cycle; Ontogeny; Phylogenetic signal

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPOD; BROWNIAN MOTION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FOSSIL RECORD; GROWTH RATE; HABITAT TYPE; JUVENILE; MOLT; ONTOGENY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEGMENTATION; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FOSSIL; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FOSSILS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

ARTHROPODA; TRILOBITOMORPHA;

EID: 84856294409     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01447.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Blomberg, S. P., and T. Garland, Jr. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 10:899-910.
2. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evol. Dev. 57:717-745.
3. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2010. Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York.
4. Butler, M. A., and A. A. King. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164:683-695.
5. Chatterton, B. D. E. 1980. Ontogenetic studies of Middle Ordovician trilobites from the Esbataottine Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Canada. Palaeontographica, Abt. A 171:1-74.
6. Chatterton, B. D. E., D. J. Siveter, G. E. Edgecombe, and A. S. Hunt. 1990. Larvae and relationships of the Calymenina (Trilobita). J. Paleontol. 64:255-277.
7. Chatterton, B. D. E., and S. E. Speyer. 1997. Ontogeny. Pp. 173-247 in H. B. Whittington, ed. Treatise on Invertebrate paleontology, part O, Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, revised. Geological Society of America and Univ. of Kansas, Boulder and Lawrence.
8. Clarkson, E. N. K., J. Ahlgren, and C. M. Taylor. 2003. Structure, ontogeny, and moulting of the olenid trilobite Ctenopyge (Eoctenopyge) angusta Westergård, 1922 from the Upper Cambrian of Västergötland, Sweden. Palaeontology 46:1-27.
9. Cock, A. G. 1966. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 41:131-190.
10. Cole, B. J. 1980. Growth ratios in holometabolous and hemimetabolous insects. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73:489-491.
11. Dyar, H. G. 1890. The number of molts in lepidopterous larvae. Psyche 5:420-422.
12. Ebach, M. C., and K. J. McNamara. 2002. A systematic revision of the family Harpetidae (Trilobita). Rec. Western Aust. Mus. 21:235-267.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:445-471.
14. Felsenstein, J. 2008. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. Am. Nat. 171:713-725.
15. Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology 33:529-576.
16. Fortey, R. A. 1997. Classification. Pp. O289-302 in H. B. Whittington, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, part O, Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, revised. Geological Society of America and Univ. of Kansas, Boulder and Lawrence.
17. Fortey, R. A. 2001. Trilobite systematics: the last 75 years. J. Paleontol. 75:1141-1151.
18. Fortey, R. A., and S. F. Morris. 1978. Discovery of nauplius-like trilobite larvae. Palaeontology 21:823-833.
19. Fusco, G. 2005. Trunk segment numbers and sequential segmentation in myriapods. Evol. Dev. 7:608-617.
20. Fusco, G., N. C. Hughes, M. Webster, and A. Minelli. 2004. Exploring developmental modes in a fossil arthropod: growth and trunk segmentation of the trilobite Aulacopleura konincki. Am. Nat. 163:167-183.
21. Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42:265-292.
22. Gill, B. C., T. W. Lyons, S. A. Young, L. R. Kump, A. H. Knoll, and M. R. Saltzman. 2011. Geochemical evidence for widespread euxinia in the later Cambrian ocean. Nature 469:80-83.
23. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351.
24. Harmon, L. J., J. Weir, C. Brock, R. Glor, W. Challenger, and G. Hunt. 2009. geiger: a package for macroevolutionary simulation and estimating parameters related to diversification from comparative phylogenetic data, Version 1.3-1. Avalable at (accessed April 13, 2011).
25. Harmon, L. J., J. B. Losos, T. J. Davies, R. G. Gillespie, J. L. Gittleman, W. B. Jennings, K. H. Kozak, M. A. McPeek, F. Moreno-Roark, T. J. Near, et al. 2010. Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data. Evolution 64:2385-2396.
26. Hartnoll, R. G. 1982. Growth. Pp. 111-196 in L. G. Abele, ed. Embryology, morphology and genetics. Academic Press, New York.
27. Harvey, T. J. P., X. P. Dong, and P. C. J. Donoghue. 2010. Are palaeoscoleicids ancestral ecdysozoans? Evol. Dev. 12:177-200.
28. Hughes, N. C. 2007. The evolution of trilobite body patterning. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35:401-434.
29. Hughes, N. C., A. Minelli, and G. Fusco. 2006. The ontogeny of trilobite segmentation: a comparative approach. Paleobiology 32:602-627.
30. Hunt, G., and M. T. Carrano. 2010. Models and methods for analyzing phenotypic evolution in lineages and clades. Pp. 245-269 in J. Alroy and G. Hunt, eds. Quantitative methods in paleobiology. The Paleontological Society, New Haven.
31. Ives, A. R., P. E. Midford, and T. Garland, Jr. 2007. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst. Biol. 56:252-270.
32. Klingenberg, C. P., and M. Zimmermann. 1992. Dyar's rule and multivariate allometric growth in nine species of waterstriders (Heteroptera: Gerridae). J. Zool. 227:453-464.
33. Lavin, S. R., W. H. Karasov, A. R. Ives, M. Middleton, and T. Garland, Jr. 2008. Morphometrics of the avian small intestine, compared with non-flying mammals: a phlyogenetic approach. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 81:526-550.
34. Lerosey-Aubril, R., and R. Feist. 2005. First Carboniferous protaspid larvae (Trilobita). J. Paleontology 79:702-718.
35. Lieberman, B. S., and T. S. Karim. 2010. Tracing the trilobite tree from the root to the tips: a model marriage of fossils and phylogeny. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 39:111-123.
36. Long, J. A., K. Trinajstic, and Z. Johanson. 2009. Devonian arthrodire embryos and the origin of internal fertilization in vertebrates. Nature 457:1124-1127.
37. Minelli, A., G. Fusco, and N. C. Hughes. 2003. Tagmata and segment specification in trilobites. Spec. Paper. Palaeontology 70:31-43.
38. Mosimann, J. E. 1970. Size allometry: size and shape variables with characterizations of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65:930-945.
39. Müller, G. B. 2007. Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:943-949.
40. Nijhout, H. F. 1994. Insect Hormones. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
41. Pagel, M. 2002. Modelling the evolution of continuously varying characters on phylogenetic trees: the case of hominid cranial capacity. Pp. 269-286 in N. MacLeod and P. L. Forey, eds. Morphology, shape and phylogeny. Taylor & Francis, London.
42. Peters, S. E. 2007. The problem with the Paleozoic. Paleobiology 33:165-181.
43. Revell, L. J., L. J. Harmon, and D. C. Collar. 2008. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57:591-601.
44. Rice, A. L. 1968. Growth rules and the larvae of decopod crustaceans. J. Nat. Hist. 2:525-530.
45. Salter, J. W. 1864. A monograph of British trilobites. Part 1. Palaeontographical Society, London, Monograph volume for 1862:1-80.
46. Smith, A. B. 2005. Growth and form in echinoids: the evolutionary interplay of plate accretion and plate addition. Pp. 181-195 in D. E. G. Briggs, ed. Evolving form and function: fossils and development. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale Univ., New Haven.
47. Speyer, S. E., and B. D. E. Chatterton. 1990. Trilobite larvae, larval ecology, and developmental paleobiology. Pp. 137-156 in D.G. Mikulic, ed. Short courses in paleontology Number 3. Paleontological Society, Knoxville, TN.
48. Stubblefield, C. J. 1926. Notes on the development of a trilobite, Shumardia pusilla (Sars). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 35:345-372.
49. Waisfeld, B. G., N. E. Vaccari, G. D. Edgecombe, and B. D. E. Chatterton. 2001. Systematics of Shumardiidae (Trilobita), with new species from the Ordovician of Argentina. J. Paleontol. 75:827-859.
50. Waloszek, D., and A. Maas. 2005. The evolutionary history of crustacean segmentation: a fossil-based perspective. Evol. Dev. 7:515-527.
51. Webster, M., and M. L. Zelditch. 2011. Evolutionary lability of integration in Cambrian ptychoparioid trilobites. Evol. Biol. 38:144-162.