Evolutionary Lability of Integration in Cambrian Ptychoparioid Trilobites

Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 144-162

  Webster, Mark ^a   Zelditch, Miriam L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cambrian; Evolution; Integration; Modularity; Morphometrics; Trilobites

Indexed keywords

EOKOCHASPIS NODOSA; PTYCHOPARIOIDEA; TRILOBITOMORPHA;

EID: 79955642703     PISSN: 00713260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-011-9110-2     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723.
2. Allen, C. E. (2008). The "eyespot" module and eyespots and modules: Development, evolution, and integration of a complex phenotype. Journal of Experimental Zoology, Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 310B(2), 179-190.
3. Armbruster, W. S., Di Stilio, V. S., Tuxill, J. D., Flores, T. C., & Runk, J. L. V. (1999). Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine neotropical plants: A re-evaluation in Berg's correlation pleiades concept. American Journal of Botany, 86(1), 39-55.
4. Auffray, J.-C., Alibert, P., Renaud, S., Orth, A., & Bonhomme, F. (1996). Fluctuating asymmetry in Mus musculus subspecific hybridization: Traditional and procrustes comparative approaches. In L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, & D. E. Slice (Eds.), Advances in morphometrics. Nato ASI series, series A: Life science (pp. 275-284). New York: Plenum Press.
5. Badyaev, A. V., & Foresman, K. R. (2000). Extreme environmental change and evolution: Stress-induced morphological variation is strongly concordant with patterns of evolutionary divergence in shrew mandibles. Proceedings of the Royal Society on London, Series B Biological Sciences, 267(1441), 371-377.
6. Badyaev, A. V., & Foresman, K. R. (2004). Evolution of morphological integration. I. Functional units channel stress-induced variation in shrew mandibles. American Naturalist, 163(6), 868-879.
7. Breuker, C. J., Gibbs, M., van Dyck, H., Brakefield, P. M., Klingenberg, C. P., & van Dongen, S. (2007). Integration of wings and their eyespots in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. Journal of Experimental Zoology, Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 308B(4), 454-463.
8. Breuker, C. J., Patterson, J. S., & Klingenberg, C. P. (2006). A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape. PLoS One, 1, e7.
9. Burger, R. (1986). Constraints for the evolution of functionally coupled characters: A nonlinear analysis of a phenotypic model. Evolution, 40, 182-193.
10. Chernoff, B., & Magwene, P. M. (1999). Afterword. Morphological integration: Forty years later. In E. C. Olson & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Morphological integration (pp. 319-353). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Cheverud, J. M. (1982). Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution, 36(3), 499-516.
12. Cheverud, J. M. (1984). Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 110, 155-171.
13. Cheverud, J. M., & Marroig, G. (2007). Comparing covariance matrices: Random skewers method compared to the common principal components model. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 30, 461-469.
14. Cowley, D. E., & Atchley, W. R. (1990). Development and quantitative genetics of correlation structure among body parts of Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturalist, 135(2), 242-268.
15. Debat, V., Alibert, P., David, P., Paradis, E., & Auffray, J.-C. (2000). Independence between developmental stability and canalization in the skull of the house mouse. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 267, 423-430.
16. Debat, V., Milton, C. C., Rutherford, S., Klingenberg, C. P., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2006). Hsp90 and the quantitative variation of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 60(12), 2529-2538.
17. Dietz, E. J. (1983). Permutation tests for association between two distance matrices. Systematic Zoology, 32(1), 21-26.
18. Drake, A. G., & Klingenberg, C. P. (2010). Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: Disparity and modularity. American Naturalist, 175(3), 289-301.
19. Edwards, D. (2008). MIM: A program for graphical modeling. Version 3. 2. 0. 7. Hypergraph Software.
20. Foote, M. (1989). Perimeter-based Fourier analysis: A new morphometric method applied to the trilobite cranidium. Journal of Paleontology, 63(6), 880-885.
21. Foote, M. (1990). Nearest-neighbor analysis of trilobite morphospace. Systematic Zoology, 39(4), 371-382.
22. Foote, M. (1991). Morphologic patterns of diversification: Examples from trilobites. Palaeontology, 34(2), 461-485.
23. Foote, M. (1993a). Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology, 19(2), 185-204.
24. Foote, M. (1993b). Contributions of individual taxa to overall morphological disparity. Paleobiology, 19(4), 403-419.
25. Fortey, R. A. (2001). Trilobite systematics: The last 75 years. Journal of Paleontology, 75(6), 1141-1151.
26. Goswami, A. (2006a). Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. American Naturalist, 168(2), 270-280.
27. Goswami, A. (2006b). Morphological integration in the carnivoran skull. Evolution, 60(1), 169-183.
28. Goswami, A. (2007). Phylogeny, diet, and cranial integration in Australodelphian marsupials. PLOS One, 2(10), e995.
29. Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., & Smith, A. G. (Eds.). (2004). A geologic time scale 2004. England: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hallgrímsson, B., Brown, J. J. Y., Ford-Hutchinson, A. F., Sheets, H. D., Zelditch, M. L., & Jirik, F. R. (2006). The brachymorph mouse and the developmental-genetic basis for canalization and morphological integration. Evolution and Development, 8(1), 61-73.
31. Hallgrímsson, B., Willmore, K., Dorval, C., & Cooper, D. M. L. (2004). Craniofacial variability and modularity in macaques and mice. Journal of Experimental Zoology, Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 302B, 207-225.
32. Herrera, C. M., Cerda, X., Garcia, M. B., Guitian, J., Medrano, M., Rey, P. J., et al. (2002). Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumblebee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15(1), 108-121.
33. Hughes, N. C. (2003a). Trilobite body patterning and the evolution of arthropod tagmosis. BioEssays, 25(4), 386-395.
34. Hughes, N. C. (2003b). Trilobite tagmosis and body patterning from morphological and developmental perspectives. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 43, 185-206.
35. Hunt, G. (2007). Evolutionary divergence in directions of high phenotypic variance in the ostracode genus Poseidonamicus. Evolution, 61(7), 1560-1576.
36. Inoue, H., Yuasa-Hashimoto, N., Suzuki, M., & Nagasawa, H. (2008). Structural determination and functional analysis of a soluble matrix protein associated with calcification of the exoskeleton of the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 72(10), 2697-2707.
37. Jamniczky, H. A., & Hallgrímsson, B. (2009). A comparison of covariance structure in wild and laboratory muroid crania. Evolution, 63(6), 1540-1556.
38. Jernigan, R. W., Culver, D. C., & Fong, D. W. (1994). The dual role of selection and evolutionary history as reflected in genetic correlations. Evolution, 48(3), 587-596.
39. Kingsolver, J. G., & Wiernasz, D. C. (1987). Dissecting correlated characters: Adaptive aspects of phenotypic covariation in melanization pattern of Pieris butterflies. Evolution, 41(3), 491-503.
40. Klingenberg, C. P. (2004). Integration, modules, and development: Molecules to morphology to evolution. In M. Pigliucci & K. A. Preston (Eds.), Phenotypic integration: Studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes (pp. 213-230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Klingenberg, C. P. (2005). Developmental constraints, modules, and evolvability. In B. Hallgrímsson & B. K. Hall (Eds.), Variation: A central concept in biology (pp. 219-247). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
42. Klingenberg, C. P. (2008). Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 115-132.
43. Klingenberg, C. P. (2009). Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: Tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses. Evolution & Development, 11(4), 405-421.
44. Klingenberg, C. P., Badyaev, A. V., Sowry, S. M., & Beckwith, N. J. (2001). Inferring developmental modularity from morphological integration: Analysis of individual variation and asymmetry in bumblebee wings. American Naturalist, 157(1), 11-23.
45. Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M., & Meyer, A. (2002). Shape analysis of symmetric structures: Quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution, 56(10), 1909-1920.
46. Klingenberg, C. P., Debat, V., & Roff, D. A. (2010). Quantitative genetics of shape in cricket wings: Developmental integration in a functional structure. Evolution, 64, 2935-2951.
47. Klingenberg, C. P., & McIntyre, G. S. (1998). Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: Analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with procrustes methods. Evolution, 52(5), 1363-1375.
48. Klingenberg, C. P., Mebus, K., & Auffray, J.-C. (2003). Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: How distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible? Evolution & Development, 5(5), 522-531.
49. Klingenberg, C. P., & Zaklan, S. D. (2000). Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution, 54(4), 1273-1285.
50. Landing, E., Bowring, S. A., Davidek, K. L., Westrop, S. R., Geyer, G., & Heldmaier, W. (1998). Duration of the early cambrian: U-Pb ages of volcanic ashes from Avalon and Gondwana. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 35, 329-338.
51. Lawler, R. R. (2008). Morphological integration and natural selection in the postcranium of wild Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 136, 204-213.
52. Leamy, L. (1984). Morphometric studies in inbred and hybrid house mice. 5. Directional and fluctuating asymmetry. American Naturalist, 123, 579-593.
53. Magwene, P. M. (2001). New tools for studying integration and modularity. Evolution, 55(9), 1734-1745.
54. Magwene, P. M. (2009). Statistical methods for studying modularity: A reply to Mitteroecker and Bookstein. Systematic Biology, 58(1), 146-149.
55. Makarenkov, V. (2000). T-REX. Version 4. 0a1. Available at http://www. labunix. uqam. ca/~makarenv/trex. html.
56. Makarenkov, V., & Legendre, P. (2004). From a phylogenetic tree to a reticulated network. Journal of Computational Biology, 11(1), 195-212.
57. Makarenkov, V., Legendre, P., & Desdevises, Y. (2004). Modelling phylogenetic relationships using reticulated networks. Zoologica Scripta, 33(1), 89-96.
58. Mantel, N. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27(2), 209-220.
59. Márquez, E. (2007a). SAGE, version 1. 03. Available at http://www-personal. umich. edu/~emarquez/morph/index. html.
60. Márquez, E. (2007b). CORIANDIS. Available at http://www-personal. umich. edu/~emarquez/morph/index. html.
61. Márquez, E. J. (2008). A statistical framework for testing modularity in multidimensional data. Evolution, 62(10), 2688-2708.
62. Marroig, G., & Cheverud, J. M. (2005). Size as a line of least evolutionary resistance: Diet and adaptive morphological radiation in new world monkeys. Evolution, 59, 1128-1142.
63. Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. (2007). The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration. Systematic Biology, 56(5), 818-836.
64. Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2009). Examining modularity via partial correlations: A rejoinder to a comment by Paul Magwene. Systematic Biology, 58(3), 346-348.
65. Monteiro, L. R., Bonato, V., & dos Reis, S. F. (2005). Evolutionary integration and morphological diversification in complex morphological structures: Mandible shape divergence in spiny rats (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Evolution & Development, 7(5), 429-439.
66. Olson, E. C., & Miller, R. L. (1958). Morphological integration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. Palmer, A. R., & Strobeck, C. (1986). Fluctuating asymmetry-Measurement, analysis, patterns. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 391-421.
68. Polanski, J. M., & Franciscus, R. G. (2006). Patterns of craniofacial integration in extant Homo, Pan, and Gorilla. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131(1), 38-49.
69. Priester, C., Dillaman, R. M., & Gay, D. M. (2005). Ultrastructure, histochemistry, and mineralization patterns in the ecdysial suture of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 11, 479-499.
70. Renaud, S., Auffray, J.-C., & Michaux, J. (2006). Conserved phenotypic variation patterns, evolution along lines of least resistance, and departure due to selection in fossil rodents. Evolution, 60, 1701-1717.
71. Resser, C. E. (1937). Third contribution to nomenclature of Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 95(22), 1-29.
72. Riedl, R. (1978). Order in living organisms: A systems analysis of evolution. New York: Wiley.
73. Rohlf, F. J. (2009). tpsDig. Version 2. 14. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. Available at http://life. bio. sunysb. edu. morph/.
74. Santos, M., Iriarte, P. F., & Cespedes, W. (2005). Genetics and geometry of canalization and developmental stability in Drosophila subobscura. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 5, 7.
75. Sattath, S., & Tversky, A. (1977). Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42(3), 319-345.
76. Schlosser, G., & Wagner, G. P. (Eds.). (2004). Modularity in development and evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77. Schluter, D. (1996). Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution, 50(5), 1766-1774.
78. Shafer, T. H., McCartney, M. A., & Faircloth, L. M. (2006). Identifying exoskeleton proteins in the blue crab from an expressed sequence tag (EST) library. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 46(6), 978-990.
79. Shaw, A. B. (1957). Quantitative trilobite studies II. Measurement of the dorsal shell of non-agnostidean trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 31(1), 193-207.
80. Sheets, H. D. (2001). Standard6beta. Department of Physics, Canisius College, Buffalo, New York. Available at http://www. canisius. edu/~sheets/morphsoft. html.
81. Sheets, H. D. (2009). SemiLand6. 7th Beta Version. Department of Physics, Canisius College, Buffalo, New York. Available at http://www. canisius. edu/~sheets/morphsoft. html.
82. Simpson, G. G. (1944). Tempo and mode in evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.
83. Sniegowski, P. D., & Murphy, H. A. (2006). Evolvability. Current Biology, 16(19), R831-R834.
84. Sundberg, F. A. (2000). Homeotic evolution in Cambrian trilobites. Paleobiology, 26(2), 258-270.
85. Sundberg, F. A. (2004). Cladistic analysis of early-middle Cambrian kochaspid trilobites (Ptychopariida). Journal of Paleontology, 78(5), 920-940.
86. Sundberg, F. A., & McCollum, L. B. (2000). Ptychopariid trilobites of the lower-middle Cambrian boundary interval, Pioche Shale, southeastern Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 74(4), 604-630.
87. Wagner, G. P. (1988). The influence of variation and of developmental constraints on the rate of multivariate phenotypic evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 1, 45-66.
88. Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50(3), 967-976.
89. Webster, M. (2007). Ontogeny and evolution of the early Cambrian trilobite genus Nephrolenellus (Olenelloidea). Journal of Paleontology, 81(6), 1168-1193.
90. Webster, M. (2011). The structure of cranidial shape variation in three early ptychoparioid trilobite species from the Dyeran-Delamaran (traditional "Lower-Middle" Cambrian) boundary interval of Nevada, U. S. A. Journal of Paleontology, 85(2), 179-225.
91. Webster, M., & Zelditch, M. L. (2011). Modularity of a Cambrian ptychoparioid trilobite cranidium. Evolution & Development, 13(1), 96-109.
92. Whittington, H. B., Chatterton, B. D. E., Speyer, S. E., Fortey, R. A., Owens, R. M., Chang, W. T., et al. (1997). Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part O. Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, revised. Volume 1: Introduction, order Agnostida, order Redlichiida. Boulder, CO and Lawrence, KS: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas.
93. Willmore, K. E., Klingenberg, C. P., & Hallgrímsson, B. (2005). The relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and environmental variance in rhesus macaque skulls. Evolution, 59(4), 898-909.
94. Young, N. (2004). Modularity and integration in the hominoid scapula. Journal of Experimental Zoology, Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 302B(3), 226-240.
95. Young, R. L., & Badyaev, A. V. (2006). Evolutionary persistence of phenotypic integration: Influence of developmental and functional relationships on complex trait evolution. Evolution, 60(6), 1291-1299.
96. Young, N. M., & Hallgrímsson, B. (2005). Serial homology and the evolution of mammalian limb covariation structure. Evolution, 59(12), 2691-2704.
97. Zelditch, M. L., & Carmichael, A. C. (1989). Ontogenetic variation in patterns of developmental and functional integration in skulls of Sigmodon fulviventer. Evolution, 43(4), 814-824.
98. Zelditch, M. L., Wood, A. R., Bonett, R. M., & Swiderski, D. L. (2008). Modularity of the rodent mandible: Integrating bones, muscles, and teeth. Evolution & Development, 10(6), 756-768.
99. Zelditch, M. L., Wood, A. R., & Swiderski, D. L. (2009). Building developmental integration into functional systems: Function-induced integration of mandibular shape. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 71-87.