Tagmata and segment specification in trilobites

Special Papers in Palaeontology

Volumn 70, Issue , 2003, Pages 31-43

  Minelli, Alessandro ^a   Fusco, Giuseppe ^a   Hughes, Nigel C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Body plan; Developmental evolution; Segmentation; Tagmosis; Trilobite

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012927895     PISSN: 00386804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. ADRAIN, J. M. and EDGECOMBE, G. D. 1997. Silurian encrinurine trilobites from the central Canadian Arctic. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 14, 1-109.
2. AKAM, M. 1998. Hox genes, homeosis and the evolution of segment identity: no need for hopeless monsters. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 42, 445-451.
3. ANDERSSON, G. 1976. Post-embryonic development of Lithobius for ficatus (L.) (Chilopoda: Lithobiidae). Entomologica Scandinavica, 7, 161-168.
4. AVEROF, M. and AKAM, M. 1993. Hom/Hox genes of Artemia: implications for the origin of insect and crustacean body plans. Current Biology, 3, 73-78.
5. - 1995. Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans. Nature, 376, 420-423.
6. BEECHER, C E. 1897. Outline of a natural classification of the trilobites. American Journal of Science, 3, 89-106.
7. BERGSTRÖM, J." 1973a. Trilobite segmentation. Acta Geologica Polonica, 23, 207-219.
8. - 1973b. Organisation, life, and systematics of trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 2, 1-69.
9. - and BRASSEL, G. 1984. Legs in the trilobite Rhenops from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Shale. Lethaia, 17, 67-72.
10. BERTO. D., FUSCO. G. and MINELLI. A. 1997. Segmental units and shape control in Chilopoda. Entomologica Scandinavica, Supplement, 51, 61-70.
11. BRIGGS, D. E. G. and FORTEY, R. A. 1989. The early radiation and relationships of the major arthropod groups. Science,246, 241-243.
12. BUDD, G. E. 2000. Ecology of nontrilobite arthropods and lobopods in the Cambrian. 404-427. In ZHURAVLEV, A. Y. and RIDING, R. (eds). The ecology of the Cambrian radiation. Columbia University Press, New York, 525 pp.
13. CARROLL, S. B., GRENIER. J. K. and WEATHERBEE, S. D. 2001. From DNA to diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 214pp.
14. CISNE, J. L. 1974. Evolution of the world fauna of aquatic free-living arthropods. Evolution, 28, 337-366.
15. - 1981. Triarthrus eatoni (Trilobita): anatomy of its exoskeletal, skeletomuscular, and digestive systems. Palaeontographica Americana, 9, 99-141.
16. CHATTERTON, B. D. E. and SPEYER, S. E. 1997. Ontogeny. 173-247. In WHITTINGTON, H. B. (ed.). Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, part O, Arthropoda I. Trilobita, revised. Geological Society of America, Boulder, and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, xxiv + 530 pp.
17. DOIILE, W. 1985. Phylogenetic pathways in the Chilopoda. Bjidragen tot de Dierkunde, 55, 55-66.
18. EDGECOMBE, G. E., CHATTERTON, B. D. E., VACARRI, N. E. and WAISFELD, B. G. 1999. Ordovician cheirurid trilobites from the Argentine Precordillera. Journal of Paleontology, 73, 1155-1175.
19. - and RAMSKÖLD, L. 1999. Relationships of Cambrian Arachnata and the systematic position of Trilobita. Journal of Paleontology, 73, 263-287.
20. ENGHOFF, H. 1990. The ground-plan of the chilognathan millipedes (external morphology). 1-21. In MINELLI, A. (ed.). Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Myriapodology. E. J. Brill, Leiden, xv + 480 pp.
21. - DOIILE, W. and BLOWER, J. G. 1993. Anamorphosis in millipedes (Diplopoda) - the present state of knowledge and phylogenetic considerations. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 109, 103-234.
22. FEIST, R. 1970. Breviscutellum (Meridioscutellum) n. sp. (trilobite) et son developpement larvaire. Geobios, 3, 41-73.
23. FLESSA, K. W., POWERS, K. V. and CISNE, J. L. 1975. Specialization and evolutionary longevity in the Arthropoda. Paleobiology, 1, 71-81.
24. FORTEY, R. A. and OWENS, R. M. 1991. A trilobite fauna from the highest Shineton Shales in Shropshire, and the correlation of the latest Tremadoc. Geological Magazine, 128, 437-464.
25. - 1997. Evolutionary history. 249-287. In WHITTINGTON, H. B. (ed.). Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, part O, Arthropoda I. Trilobita, revised. Geological Society of America, Boulder, and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, xxiv + 530 pp.
26. - and WHITTINGTON, H. B. 1989. The Trilobita as a natural group. Historical Biology, 2, 125-138.
27. FUSCO, G. and MINELLI, A. 2000. Measuring morphological complexity of segmented animals: centipedes as model systems. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 38-46.
28. GELLON, G. and MCGINNIS, W. 1998. Shaping animal body plans in development and evolution of Hox expression patterns. BioEssays, 20, 116-125.
29. GEOFFROY G. G. 1984. Particularités du développement post-embryonnaire du diplopode craspedosomide cavernicole Opisthocheiron canayerensis. Mémoires Biospéologiques, 11, 211-220.
30. GIRIBET, G., CARRANZA, S., RIUTORT. M., BAGUÑÀ, J. and RIBERA, C. 1999. Internal phylogeny of the Chilopoda (Myriapoda, Arthropoda) using complete 18S rDNA and partial 28S rDNA sequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 352, 215-222.
31. - EDGECOMBE, G. D. and WHEELER, W. C. 2001. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature, 413, 157-161.
32. HESSLER, R. R. 1962. Secondary segmentation of the trilobite thorax. Journal of Paleontology, 36, 1305-1312.
33. IIU, C. H. 1971. Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of Lower Paleozoic Trilobita. Palaeontographica Americana, 44, 1-155.
34. HUGHES, C. L. and KAUFMAN, T. C. 2000. A diverse approach to arthropod development. Evolution&Development, 2, 6-8.
35. - 2002a. Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede. Development, 129, 1225-1238.
36. - 2002b. Exploring myriapod segmentation: the expression patterns of even-skipped, engrailed and wingless in a centipede. Developmental Biology, 247, 47-61.
37. - 2002c. Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Evolution&Development, 4, 459-499.
38. HUGHES, N. C. 2003. Trilobite body patterning and the evolution of arthropod tagmosis. BioEssays, 25, 386-395.
39. - in 'press. Trilobite tagmosis and body patterning from morphological and developmental perspectives. Integrative and Comparative Biology.
40. - and CHAPMAN, R. E. 1995. Growth and variation in the Silurian proetide trilobite Aulacopleura konincki and its implications for trilobite palaeobiology. Lethaia, 28, 333-353.
41. - 2001. Morphometry and phylogeny in the resolution of paleobiological problems - unlocking the evolutionary significance of an assemblage of Silurian trilobites. 29-54. In ADRAIN, J. M., EDGECOMBE, G. D. and LIEBERMAN, B. S. (eds). Fossils, phylogeny and form: an analytical approach. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York, 402 pp.
42. - and ADRAIN, J. M. 1999. The stability of thoracic segmentation in trilobites: a case study in developmental and ecological constraints. Evolution&Development, 1, 24-35.
43. HUYS, R. and BOXSHALL, G. A. 1991. Copepod evolution. The Ray Society, London, 468 pp.
44. KETTLE, C, JOHNSTONE, J., JOWETT, T., ARTHUR, H. and ARTHUR, W. 2003. The pattern of segment formation, as revealed by engrailed expression, in a centipede with a variable number of segments. Evolution&Development, 5, 198-207.
45. KOPASKA-MERKEL, D. C 1987. Ontogeny and evolution of an Ordovician trilobite. Society of Economic Mineralogists and Paleontologists, Mid-Year Meeting, Abstracts, 4, 43-44.
46. LAUTERBACH, K.-E. 1980. Schlüsselereignisse in der Evolution des Grundplanes der Arachnata (Arthropoda). Abhandlungen und Verhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Hamburg, Neue Folge, 23, 163-327.
47. LAWRENCE, P. A. 1992. The making of a fly. Blackwell, Oxford, xiii + 228 pp.
48. MATTHEW, G. F. 1889. Sur le développpement des premiers trilobites. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, 23, 351.
49. MAYNARDSMITH, J. 1960. Continuous, quantised and modal variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 152, 397-409.
50. MCNAMARA, K. J. 1983. Progenesis in trilobites. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 30, 59-68.
51. MINELLI, A. 1992. Towards a new morphology of myriapods. Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlich-Medizinischen Vereins in Innsbruck, Supplementum, 10, 37-46.
52. - 2000. Holomeric vs. meromeric segmentation: a tale of centipedes, leeches, and rhombomeres. Evolution&Development, 2, 35-48.
53. - 2001. A three-phase model of arthropod segmentation. Development,Genes and Evolution, 211, 509-521.
54. - and BORTOLETTO, S. 1988. Myriapod metamerism and arthropod segmentation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 33, 323-343.
55. - and FUSCO, G. 1995. Body segmentation and segment differentiation: the scope for heterochronic change. 49-63. In MCNAMARA. K. J. (ed.). Evolutionary change and heterochrony. Wiley&Sons, Chichester, xii + 286 pp.
56. - FODDAI, D., PEREIRA, L. A. and LEWIS, J. G. E. 2000. The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 38, 103-117.
57. MÜLLER, K. J. and WALOSSEK, D. 1987. Morphology, ontogeny, and life habit of Agnostus pisiformis from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden. Fossils and Strata, 19, 1-124.
58. NÜSSLEIN-VOLHARD, C. and WIESCHAUS, E. 1980. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature, 287, 795-801.
59. PATEL, N. N., KORNBERG, T. B. and GOODMAN, C S. 1989. Expression of engrailed during segmentation in grasshopper and crayfish. Development, 107, 201-212.
60. PENG SHANCHI, BABCOCK, L. E., HUGHES, N. C. and LIN HUANLING 2003. Upper Cambrian shumardiids from north-western Hunan, China. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 70, 197-212.
61. RAW, F. 1925. The development of Leptoplastus salteri (Calloway) and of other trilobites (Olenidae, Ptychopariidae, Conocoryphidae, Paradoxidae, Phacopidae, and Mesonacidae). Journal of the Geological Society of London, 81, 223-324.
62. - 1953. The external morphology of the trilobite and its significance. Journal of Paleontology, 27, 82-129.
63. RAYMOND, P. E. 1920. The appendages, anatomy, and relationships of trilobites. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Sciences, 7, 1-169.
64. ROGERS, B. T., PETERSON, M. D. and KAUFMAN, T. C. 1997. Evolution of the insect body plan as revealed by the Sex combs reduced expression pattern. Development, 124, 149-157.
65. SAUNDERS, P. T. and HO, M. V. 1984. The complexity of organisms. 121-139. In POLLARD, J. W. (ed.). Evolutionary theory: paths into the future. John Wiley&Sons, Chichester, xxii + 270 pp.
66. STORMER, L. 1942. Studies on trilobite morphology, Part 2. The larval development, the segmentation and the sutures, and their bearing on trilobite classification. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 21, 50-163.
67. STUBBLEFIELD, C. J. 1926. Notes on the development of a trilobite, Shumardia pusilla (Sars). Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 36, 345-372.
68. - 1959. Evolution in trilobites. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 115, 145-162.
69. SUNDBERG, F. A. 2000. Homeotic evolution in Cambrian trilobites. Paleobiology, 26, 258-270.
70. WALCOTT, C. D. 1921. Cambrian geology and paleontology IV. Notes on structure of Neolenus. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67, 365-456.
71. WHITTINGTON, H. B. 1975. Trilobites with appendages from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Fossils and Strata, 4, 97-136.
72. - 1980. Exoskeleton, moult stage, appendage morphology, and habits of the Middle Cambrian trilobite Olenoides serratus. Palaeontology, 23, 171-204.
73. - and ALMOND, J. E. 1987. Appendages and habits of the Upper Ordovician trilobite Triarthrus eatoni. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 317, 1-46.
74. - and EVITT, W. R. 1953. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites. Geological Society of America, Memoir, 59, 1-137.
75. WILLS, M. A., BRIGGS, D. E. G. and FORTEY, R. A. 1994. Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Paleobiology, 20, 93-130.
76. - 1997. Evolutionary correlates of arthropod tagmosis: scrambled legs. 57-65. In FORTEY, R. A. and THOMAS, R. H. (ed.). Arthropod relationships. Chapman and Hall, London, xii + 383 pp.