Trunk segment numbers and sequential segmentation in myriapods

Evolution and Development

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 608-617

  Fusco, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; SEGMENTATION;

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; CLASSIFICATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BODY PATTERNING; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; PHYLOGENY;

ARTHROPODA; MYRIAPODA;

EID: 28244475912     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2005.05064.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Beklemishev, W. N. 1969. Principles of Comparative Anatomy of Invertebrates. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
2. Berto, D., Fusco, G., and Minelli, A. 1997. Segmental units and shape control in Chilopoda. Entomol. Scand. 51 (suppl.): 61-70.
3. Bonato, L., Foddai, D., and Minelli, A. 2003. Evolutionary trends and patterns in centipede segment number based on a cladistic analysis of Mecistocephalidae (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Syst. Ent. 28: 539-579.
4. Budd, G. E. 2001. Why are arthropods segmented? Evol. Dev. 3: 332-342.
5. Chipman, A. D., Arthur, W., and Akam, M. 2004a. Early development and segment formation in the centipede Strigamia maritima (Geophilomorpha). Evol. Dev. 6: 78-89.
6. Chipman, A. D., Arthur, W., and Akam, M. 2004b. A double segment periodicity underlies segment generation in centipede development. Curr. Biol. 14: 1250-1255.
7. Davidson, E. H. 2001. Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.
8. Davis, G. K., and Patel, N. H. 2002. Short, long and beyond: molecular and embryological approaches to insect segmentation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 669-699.
9. Davis, G. K., and Patel, N. H. 2003. Playing by pair-rules? BioEssays 25: 425-429.
10. Dearden, P. K., Donly, C., and Grbić, M. 2002. Expression of pair-rule gene homologues in a chelicerate: early patterning of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Development 129: 5461-5472.
11. Demange, J.-M. 1969. La réduction métamérique chez les chilopodes et les diplopodes chilognathes (Myriapodes). Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat. Paris 40: 532-538.
12. Dohle, W. 1974. The segmentation of the germ band of Diplopoda compared with other classes of arthropods. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 32: 143-161.
13. Dunger, W. 1993. Symphyla. In H.-E. Gruner (ed.). Lehrbuch der speziellen Zoologie. Wirbellose Tiere. Vol. 1(4);
14. H.-E. Gruner, M. Moritz, and W. Dunger (eds.). Arthropoda (ohne Insecta). G. Fischer, Jena, pp. 1094-1105.
15. Edgecombe, G. D., and Giribet, G. 2002. Myriapod phylogeny and the relationships of Chilopoda. In J. Llorente Bousquets and J. J. Morrone (eds.). Biodiversidad, Taxonomía y Biogeografia de Artrópodos de México: Hacia una Síntesis de su Conocimiento. Prensas de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, pp. 143-168.
16. Edgecombe, G. D., and Giribet, G. 2004. Adding mitochondrial sequence data (16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) to the phylogeny of centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): an analysis of morphology and four molecular loci. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 42: 89-134.
17. Edwards, C. A. 1959. Keys to the genera of the Symphyla. J. Linn. Soc. London Zool. 44: 164-169.
18. Enghoff, H. 1984. Phylogeny of millipedes - a cladistic analysis. Z. Zool. Syst. EvolForsch. 22: 8-26.
19. Enghoff, H., Dohle, W., and Blower, J. G. 1993. Anamorphosis in millipedes (Diplopoda) - the present state of knowledge and phylogenetic considerations. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 109: 103-234.
20. Fusco, G., and Minelli, A. 2000a. Measuring morphological complexity of segmented animals: centipedes as model systems. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 38-46.
21. Fusco, G., and Minelli, A. 2000b. Developmental stability in geophilomorph centipedes. In J. Wytwer and S. Golovatch (eds.). Progress in Studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora. Fragmenta Faunistica, Vol. 43, (suppl.), Museum and Institute of Zoology, PAS, Warszawa, pp. 73-82.
22. Hertzel, G. 1984. Die Segmentation des Keimstreifens von. Lithobius forficatus (L.) (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). Zool. Jb. Anat. 112: 369-386.
23. Heymons, R. 1901. Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender. Zoologica (Stuttgart) 13: 1-244.
24. Hoffman, R. L. 1982. Diplopoda. In S. P. Parker (ed.). Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 689-724.
25. Holland, P. W. H. 1990. Homeobox genes and segmentation: co-option, co-evolution, and convergence. Semin. Dev. Biol. 1: 135-145.
26. Hughes, C. L., and Kaufman, T. C. 2002. Exploring myriapod segmentation: the expression pattern of even-skipped, engrailed, and wingless in a centipede. Dev. Biol. 247: 47-61.
27. Hughes, N. C., Chapman, R. E., and Adrain, J. M. 1999. Stability of thoracic segmentation in trilobites: a case study in developmental and ecological constraints. Evol. Dev. 1: 24-35.
28. Janssen, R., Prpic, N.-M., and Damen, W. G. M. 2004. Gene expression suggests decoupled dorsal and ventral segmentation in the millipede Glomeris marginata (Myriapoda: Diplopoda). Dev. Biol. 268: 89-104.
29. Kettle, C., and Arthur, W. 2000. Latitudinal cline in segment number in an arthropod species, Strigamia maritima. Proc. R. Soc. London B267: 1393-1397.
30. Lewis, J. G. E. 1981. The Biology of Centipedes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Linder, F. 1952. Contributions to the morphology and taxonomy of the Branchiopoda Notostraca, with special reference to the north American species. Proc. US. Nat. Mus. 102: 1-69.
32. Maruzzo, D., Bonato, L., Brena, C., Fusco, G., and Minelli, A. 2005. Appendage loss and regeneration in arthropods: a comparative view. Crustacean Issues 16: 81-111.
33. Minelli, A. 1992. Towards a new comparative morphology of myriapods. Ber. Nat.-Med. Vereins Innsbruck 10 (suppl.): 37-46.
34. Minelli, A. 1993. Chilopoda. In F. W. Harrison (ed.). Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates. Vol. 12 - Onychophora, Chilopoda, and Lesser Protostomata. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 57-114.
35. Minelli, A. 2001. A three-phase model of arthropod segmentation. Dev. Genes Evol. 211: 509-521.
36. Minelli, A. 2004. Bits and pieces. Science 306: 1693-1694.
37. Minelli, A., Foddai, D., Pereira, L. A., and Lewis, J. G. E. 2000. The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 38: 103-117.
38. Minelli, A., and Fusco, G. 2004. Evo-devo perspectives on segmentation: model organisms, and beyond. TREE 19: 423-429.
39. Minelli, A., Fusco, G., and Hughes, N. C. 2003. Tagmata and segment specification in trilobites. In P. D. Ane, R. A. Fortey, and D. J. Siveter (eds.). Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Trilobites and Their Relatives. Special Papers in Palaeontology, Vol. 70, The Palaeontological Association, London, pp. 31-43.
40. Newman, S. A. 1993. Is segmentation generic? BioEssays 15: 277-283.
41. Newman, S. A. 1994. Generic physical mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis: a common basis for development and evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 7: 467-488.
42. Nijhout, H. F., and Davidowitz, G. 2003. Developmental perspectives on phenotypic variation, canalization, and fluctuating asymmetry. In M. Polak (ed.). Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3-13.
43. Peel, A. 2004. The evolution of arthropod segmentation mechanisms. BioEssays 26: 1108-1116.
44. Peel, A., and Akam, M. 2003. Evolution of segmentation: rolling back the clock. Curr. Biol. 13: R708-R710.
45. Pourquié, O. 2003. The segmentation clock: converting embryonic time into spatial pattern. Science 301: 328-330.
46. Rivera-Pomar, R., and Jäckle, H. 1996. From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling the gaps. TIG 12: 478-483.
47. Rogers, B. T., and Kaufman, T. C. 1997. Structure of the insect head in ontogeny and phylogeny: a view from Drosophila. Int. Rev. Cytol. 174: 1-84.
48. Salazar-Ciudad, I., Solé, R. V., and Newman, S. A. 2001. Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks II. Application to the evolution of segmentation mechanisms. Evol. Dev. 3: 95-103.
49. Scheller, U. 1982. Pauropoda. In S. P. Parker (ed.). Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 724-726.
50. Scheller, U. 1985. On the classification of the family Brachypauropodidae (Myriapoda; Pauropoda) Bijdr. Dierk. 55: 202-208.
51. Schileyko, A. A. in press. Redescription of Scolopendropsis bahiensis (Brandt, 1841), the relations between Scolopendropsis and Rhoda, and notes on some characters used in scolopendromorph taxonomy (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha). Arthropoda Selecta.
52. Scholtz, G. 2002. The Articulata hypothesis - or what is a segment? Org. Divers. Evol. 2: 197-215.
53. Sograff, N. J. 1883. Materials toward the knowledge of the embryonic development of Geophilus ferrugineus and Geophilus proximus. Izvestiia Obshchestva liubitelei estestvoznaniina, antropologii i etnografii pri lmp Moskovskom Universitete. 2: 1-77 [in Russian].
54. Stollewerk, A., Schoppmeler, M., and Damen, W. G. M. 2003. Involvement of Notch and Delta genes in spider segmentation. Nature 423: 863-865.
55. Tiegs, O. W. 1940. The embryology and affinities of the Symphyla, based on a study of Hanseniella agilis. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 82: 1-225.
56. Tiegs, O. W. 1947. The development and affinities of the Pauropoda, based on a study of Pauropus silvaticus. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 88: 165-336.
57. Wagner, g. p. 1996. Homology, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am. Zool. 36: 36-43.
58. Yuh, C.-H., Bolouri, H., and Davidson, E. H. 1998. Genomic cis-regulatory logic: experimental and computational analysis of a sea urchin gene. Science 279: 1896-1902.