The Effects of Institutional Distance and Headquarters' Financial Performance on the Generation of Environmental Standards in Multinational Companies

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 461-474

  Aguilera Caracuel, Javier ^a   Aragón Correa, Juan Alberto ^a   Hurtado Torres, Nuria Esther ^a   Rugman, Alan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental institutional distance between countries; Environmental standardization; Financial performance; Multinational company; Natural environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856233686     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0978-7     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Alberti, M., Cain, L., Calabrese, A., & Rossi, D. (2000). Evaluation of the costs and benefits of an environmental management systems. International Journal of Production Research, 38, 4455-4466.
2. Ang, Z., & Massingham, P. (2007). National culture and the standardization versus adaptation of knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 5-21.
3. Aragón-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556-567.
4. Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88.
5. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218.
6. Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. (2003). Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 289-299.
7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
8. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
9. Beschorner, T., & Müller, M. (2007). Social standards: Toward an active ethical involvement of businesses in developing countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(1), 11-20.
10. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1998). Models of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 21-44.
11. Bush, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2009). Ecology-driven real options: An investment framework for incorporating uncertainties in the context of the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 295-310.
12. Capital IQ. (2008). A division of standard & poor's. Accessed August 29, 2009 from http://www.capitaliq.com.
13. Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15.
14. Chao, M. C.-H., & Kumar, V. (2010). The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity-performance relationship. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 93-103.
15. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of best practices of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.
16. Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747-760.
17. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 439-458.
18. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2002). Globalization and the environment: Strategies for international voluntary environmental initiatives. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 121-135.
19. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 863-878.
20. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1984). Applied multiple regression: Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Cordano, M., Marshall, R. S., & Silverman, M. (2010). How do small and medium enterprises go green? A study of environmental management programs in the U. S. wine industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(3), 463-478.
22. Cordeiro, J., & Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: Evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(2), 104-114.
23. Darnall, N. (2006). Why firms mandate ISO 14001 certification. Business & Society, 45(3), 354-381.
24. Darnall, N., & Edwards, D. (2006). Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The Role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 301-320.
25. Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management, 14(4), 364-376.
26. Dasgupta, S., & Hettige, H. (2000). What improves environmental performance? Evidence from Mexican industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39(1), 39-66.
27. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
28. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059-1074.
29. Drezner, D. (2000). Bottom feeders. Foreign Policy, 122(1), 64-73.
30. Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2004). Distance matters: liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Bush School working paper no. 404. College Station: Texas A & M University.
31. Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131-145.
32. Esty, D., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & Sherbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
33. Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organization and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637-664.
34. European Pollutant Emission Register (EPER). (2005). Accessed June 20, 2009, from http://www.eper.eea.europa.eu/eper.
35. Florida, R., & Davison, D. (2001). Gaining from green management: environmental management systems inside and outside the factory. California Management Review, 43(3), 64-85.
36. Gilley, K., Worrell, D., & El-Jelly, A. (2000). Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: The differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1199-1216.
37. Hair, J. F., Andersson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2008). Multivariate analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.
38. Hamilton, J. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxic release inventory data. Journal of Environmental and Economic Management Review, 28(1), 98-113.
39. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
40. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37.
41. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381-396.
42. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.
43. Hoffman, A. (1997). From Heresy to Dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
44. Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U. S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.
45. Hoffman, A. (2001). Linking organizational and field-level analyses. The diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization and Environment, 14(2), 133-156.
46. King, A. A., & Lennox, M. J. (2000). Industry self regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698-717.
47. King, A. A., & Shaver, J. M. (2001). Are aliens green? Assessing foreign establishments' environmental conduct in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 1069-1086.
48. Klassen, R., & McLaughlin, C. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
49. Köhl, M., Traub, B., & Päivinen, R. (2000). Harmonisation and standardisation in multi-national environmental statistics-mission impossible? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 63(2), 361-380.
50. Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2010). MNC reporting on CSR and conflict in Central Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 241-255.
51. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2008). A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate Change: Learning from an inconvenient truth. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1359-1378.
52. Kolk, A., & van Tulder, R. (2010). International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International Business Review, 19(1), 119-125.
53. Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308-324.
54. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215-233.
55. Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994-1006.
56. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64-81.
57. Lennox, M. J., & Nash, J. (2003). Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(6), 343-356.
58. Leonard, H. J. (1988). Pollution and the struggle for a world product: Multinational corporations, environment, and the struggle for international comparative advantage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. López, M. V., García, A., & Rodríguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285-300.
60. Majumdar, S. K., & Marcus, A. A. (2001). Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 170-179.
61. Manrodt, K. B., & Vitasek, K. (2004). Global process standardization: A case study. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 1-23.
62. Martín-Tapia, I., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2010). Environmental strategy and exports in medium, small and micro-enterprises. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 266-275.
63. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
64. Miles, M., Munilla, L., & Darroch, J. (2006). The role of strategic conversations with stakeholders in the formation of corporate social responsibility strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 195-205.
65. Mohr, R. D. (2006). Environmental performance standards and the adoption of technology. Ecological Economics, 58(2), 238-248.
66. Molina-Azorín, J. F., Claver-Cortés, E., López-Gamero, M. D., & Tarí, J. J. (2009). Green management and financial performance: A literature review. Management Decision, 47(7), 1080-1100.
67. Mueller, M., Gomes dos Santos, V., & Seuring, S. (2009). The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 509-523.
68. National Pollution Release Inventory (NPRI). (2005). Accessed July 26, 2009, from http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/websol/querysite.
69. Nehrt, C. (1996). Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 535-547.
70. Niemejer, D. (2002). Developing indicators for environmental policy: Data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example. Environmental Science & Policy, 5, 91-103.
71. Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245-1264.
72. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 145-179.
73. Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697-713.
74. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
75. Orr, R. J., & Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutional exception on global projects: A process model. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 562-588.
76. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920-936.
77. Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2007). Multinational corporations and emissions trading: Strategic responses to new institutional constraints. European Management Journal, 25(6), 441-452.
78. Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., de Burgos-Jiménez, J., & Carmona-Moreno, E. (2010). Measuring stakeholder integration: Knowledge, interaction and adaptational behaviour dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 419-442.
79. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
80. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 745-769.
81. Rappaport, A., & Flaherty, M. (1992). Corporate responses to environmental challenges: Initiatives by multinational management. New York: Quorum Books.
82. Registro de Emisiones y Transferencia de Contaminantes (RETC). (2005). Accessed 21 July, 2009, from http://www.app1.semarnat.gob.mx/retc.
83. Robert, C., Probst, T. M., & Martocchio, J. J. (2000). Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: Predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 643-658.
84. Rondinelli, D., & Vastag, G. (1996). International environmental standards and corporate policies: An integrative framework. California Management Review, 39(1), 106-122.
85. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 143-156.
86. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1998a). Corporate strategy and international environmental policy. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 819-833.
87. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1998b). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 363-375.
88. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2001). Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 237-250.
89. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
90. Scholtens, B., & Dam, L. (2007). Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 273-285.
91. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681-697.
92. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729-753.
93. Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 183-200.
94. Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52-76.
95. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: an empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195-204.
96. Stewart, R. (1993). Environmental regulation and international competitiveness. Yale Law Journal, 102, 2039-2106.
97. Szulanski, G., & Jensen, R. J. (2006). Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 937-957.
98. Toxic Release Inventory (TRI). (2005). Accessed August 6, 2009, from http://www.epa.gov/TRI.
99. Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444.
100. Vernon, R. (1992). Transnational corporations: Where are they coming from, where are they headed? Transnational Corporations, 24(1/2), 7-35.
101. Voss, G., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Giraud Voss, Z. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 147-164.
102. White, H. (1995). Does it pay to be green? Corporate environmental responsibility and shareholder value. Working paper. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
103. World Bank. (2006). http://www. worldbank. org.
104. Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Note: Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608-618.
105. Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs' subsidiaries: A stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 155-169.
106. Yip, G. S., Johansson, J. K., & Roos, J. (1997). Effects of nationality on global strategy. Management International Review, 37(4), 365-385.
107. Zaheer, S., & Masakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439-464.