Corporate strategy and international environmental policy

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 819-833

  Rugman, Alan M ^a   Verbeke, Alain ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032263267     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490053     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Atik, Jeffery. 1997. Science and international regulatory convergence. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17(2/3): 736-58.
2. Barney, Jay. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
3. Barrett, S. 1991. Environmental regulations for competitive advantage. Business Strategy Review, 2(1): 1-15.
4. Bartlett, Christopher & Sumantra Ghoshal. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
5. Benson, Christina. 1996. The ISO 14000 international standards: Moving beyond environmental compliance. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 22(1): 307-64.
6. Boddewyn, Jean J. & Thomas L. Brewer. 1994. International business political behaviour: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19(1): 119-43.
7. Burhenne, Wolfgang, editor. 1996. Strengthening the application of international environmental law. Environmental Policy and Law, 26(4): 170-4.
8. Commission for Environmental Cooperation (1995). NAFTA environmental effects, potential NAFTA effects: Claims and arguments, 1991-1994. Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
9. Conner, Kathleen R. 1991. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial economics. Journal of Management, 17(1): 121-54.
10. Gore, Albert. 1992. Earth in balance: Ecology and the human spirit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Henriques, I. & P. Sadorsky. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally response firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30: 381-95.
12. Kirton, John. 1992. Canada’s contribution to a new trade-environment regime. Trade, environment and competitiveness: Sustaining Canada’s prosperity. Ottawa: National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy.
13. Kirton, John & Julie Soloway. 1996. Assessing NAFTA's Environmental Effects: Dimensions of a framework and the NAFTA regime. NAFTA effects working paper series, working paper #1. Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
14. Koskenniemi, Martti. 1996. New institutions and procedures for implementation control and reaction: 236-48 in Jacob Werksman, editor, Greening international institutions. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
15. Levy, David L, 1995. The environmental practices and performances of transnational corporations. Transnational Corporations, 4(1): 44-67.
16. Low, Patrick & Alexander Yeats. 1992. Do ‘dirty’ industries migrate?. In Patrick Low, editor, International trade and the environment. World Bank discussion paper 159. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 89-103.
17. Lucas, Robert E. B., David Wheeler & Hemamala Hettige. 1992. Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution. In Patrick Low, editor, International trade and the environment. World Bank discussion paper 159. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 67-86.
18. Makuch, Zen. 1996. The World Trade Organization and general agreement on tariffs and trade. In Jacob Werksman, editor, Greening international institutions. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. 94-115.
19. Nehrt, Chad. 1998. Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review, 23(1): 77-97.
20. Penrose, Edith. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. London: Basil Blackwell.
21. Porter, Michael E. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York, NY: The Free Press.
22. Porter, Michael E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
23. Porter, Michael E. & Charles van der Linde. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitive-ness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 97-118.
24. Public Citizen. 1996. NAFTA's Broken Promises: The border betrayed, NAFTA's environmental effects. Washington, DC: Public Citizen, January.
25. Richardson, Sarah. 1992. Overview on trade, environment and competitiveness. Trade, environment and competitiveness: Sustaining Canada's prosperity. Ottawa: National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy.
26. Rugman, Alan M. 1990. Multinationals and the Canada-United States free trade agreement. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
27. Rugman, Alan M., editor. 1994. Foreign Investment and NAFTA, (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press).
28. Rugman, Alan M. 1995. Environmental regulations and international competitiveness: Strategies for Canada’s West Coast forest products industry. The International Executive, 37(5): 451-65.
29. Rugman, Alan M, John Kirton & Julie A. Soloway. 1997. NAFTA, environmental regulations and Canadian competitiveness. Journal of World Trade, 31(4): 129-44.
30. Rugman, Alan M. 1999. Environmental regulations and corporate strategy: A NAFTA perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Rugman, Alan M. & Michael Gestrin. 1997. New rules for multilateral investment. The International Executive, 39(1): 21-34.
32. Rugman, Alan M. & Alain Verbeke. 1990. Global corporate strategy and trade policy. London and New York: Routledge.
33. Rugman, Alan M. 1994. Foreign direct investment and NAFTA: A conceptual framework. In Alan M. Rugman, editor, Foreign investment and NAFTA. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 80-101.
34. Rugman, Alan M. 1998. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 363-75.
35. Rumelt, Richard P. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In Richard B. Lamb, editor, Competitive strategic management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 556-70.
36. Safarian, A.E. 1993. Multinational enterprise and public policy. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
37. Shrivastava, P. 1995, The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 936-60.
38. Somsen, Han. 1996. The European Union and the organization for economic cooperation and development. In Jacob Werksman, editor, Greening international institutions. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. 181-204.
39. Staffin, Elliot B. 1996. Trade barrier or trade boon? A critical evaluation of environmental labelling and its role in the ‘greening’ of world trade. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 21(2): 205-86.
40. Vogel, David. 1995. Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulations in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Vogel, David. & Alan M. Rugman. 1997. Environmentally-related trade disputes between the United States and Canada. The American Review of Canadian Studies, 27(2): 271-92.
42. Walley, N. & B. Whitehead. 1994. It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3): 46-52.
43. Werksman, Jacob, editor. 1996. Greening international institutions. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.