Situation Awareness in the NextGen Air Traffic Management System

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 140-151

  Chiappe, Dan ^a   Vu, Kim Phuong L ^a   Strybel, Tom ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855941768     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2012.634768     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Aizawa, K. 2010. The coupling-constitution fallacy revisited. Cognitive Systems Research, 11: 332-342.
2. Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. 2009. "Embodied cognition and the extended mind". In Routledge companion to the philosophy of psychology, Edited by: Garzon, P. and Symons, J. 193-213. New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Amalberti, R. March 1999. "Risk management by regulation". In Paper presented at the 19th Myron B. Laver International Postgraduate Course "Risk Management," Department of Anaesthesia, March, Switzerland: University of Basel.
4. Anderson, M. 2003. Embodied cognition: A field guide. Cognitive Science, 149: 91-130.
5. Barsalou, L. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22: 577-660.
6. Branigan, H., Pickering, M. and Cleland, A. 1999. Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6: 635-640.
7. Brooker, P. 2008. SESAR and NextGen: Investing in new paradigms. Journal of Navigation, 61: 195-208.
8. Cardosi, K. 1993. An analysis of en route controller-pilot voice communications (Report No. DOT/FAA/RD-93-11), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Aviation Administration, Research and Development Service.
9. Chabris, C., Weinberger, A., Fontaine, M. and Simons, D. 2011. You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault. i-Perception, 2: 150-153.
10. Chiappe, D., Rorie, C., Morgan, C. and Vu, K. 2011. A situated approach to team and shared SA, Manuscript in preparation.
11. Chiappe, D., Strybel, T. and Vu, K-P. L. 2011. Mechanisms for the acquisition of situation awareness in situated agents. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. Advance online publication, doi:10.1080/1463922X.2011.611267
12. Clark, A. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Cramton, C. 2001. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12: 346-371.
15. Dao, A. Q., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Vu, K-P. L., Strybel, T. Z. and Johnson, W. W. 2009. The impact of automation assisted aircraft separation on situation awareness, July, San Diego, CA: Paper presented at the 13th Annual International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
16. Dekker, S. and Hollnagel, E. 2004. Human factors and folk models. Cognition, Technology, and Work, 6: 79-86.
17. Dekker, S., Hummerdal, D. H. and Smith, K. 2011. Situation awareness: Some remaining questions. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11: 131-135.
18. Dekker, S., Nyce, J., van Winsen, R. and Henriqson, E. 2010. Epistemological self-confidence in human factors research. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 4: 27-38.
19. Durso, F. T. and Alexander, A. 2010. "Managing workload, performance, and situation awareness in aviation systems". In Human factors in aviation, 2nd, Edited by: Salas, E. and Maurino, D. 217-247. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
20. Durso, F., Bleckley, K. and Dattel, A. 2006. Does situation awareness add to the validity of cognitive tests?. Human Factors, 48: 721-733.
21. Durso, F. T. and Dattel, A. 2004. "SPAM: The real-time assessment of SA". In A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measures and application, Edited by: Banbury, S. and Trembley, S. 137-154. New York, NY: Aldershot.
22. Durso, F., Hackworth, C., Truitt, T., Crutchfield, J. and Manning, C. 1998. Situation awareness as a predictor of performance in en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Quarterly, 6: 1-20.
23. Durso, F. T. and Manning, C. A. 2009. "Air traffic control". In Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, 4th, Edited by: Carswell, C. M. 195-244. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
24. Durso, F., Rawson, K. and Girotto, S. 2007. "Comprehension and situation awareness". In Handbook of Applied Cognition, 2nd, Edited by: Durso, F., Nickerson, R., Dumais, S., Lewandowsky, S. and Perfect, T. 163-194. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
25. Durso, F. and Sethumadhavan, A. 2008. Situation awareness: Understanding dynamic environments. Human Factors, 50: 442-448.
26. Endsley, M. R. 1995a. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37: 65-84.
27. Endsley, M. R. 1995b. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37: 32-64.
28. Endsley, M. R., Bolte, B. and Jones, D. G. 2003. Designing for situation awareness: An approach to human-centered design, London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
29. Endsley, M. R. and Jones, W. M. 1997. Situation awareness, information dominance, and information warfare (AL/CF-TR-1997-0156), Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: United States Air Force Armstrong Laboratory.
30. Endsley, M. R., Mogford, R., Allendoefer, K. R., Snyder, M. D. and Stein, E. 1997. Effect of free flight conditions on controller performance, workload, and situational awareness (FAA Tech. Rep.), Atlantic City International Airport, NJ: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
31. Endsley, M. R. and Smolensky, M. 1998. "Situation awareness in air traffic control: The picture". In Human factors in air traffic control, Edited by: Smolensky, M. and Stein, E. 115-154. New York, NY: Academic Press.
32. Endsley, M. R., Sollenberger, R. and Stein, E. 2000. "Situation awareness: A comparison of measures". In Proceedings of the Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: User Centered Design for the New Millennium Conference 1-6.
33. Erzberger, H. 2006. "Automated conflict resolution for air traffic control". In Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS) 1-27.
34. Federal Aviation Administration. (2011). NextGen Implementation Plan. http://www.faa.gov/nextgen/media/ng2011_implementation_plan.pdf
35. Fitts, P. M., Jones, R. E. and Milton, J. L. 1950. Eye movements of aircraft pilots during instrument-landing approaches. Aeronautical Engineering Review, 9: 24-29.
36. Garrod, S. and Anderson, A. 1987. Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27: 181-218.
37. Garrod, S. and Pickering, M. J. 2004. Why is conversation so easy?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 8-11.
38. Godwin, R. 1971. Apollo 13: Mission reports, Burlington, Canada: Apogee Books.
39. Goldinger, S. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105: 251-279.
40. Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J. and Winner, J. L. 2006. Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments. Ergonomics, 49: 1312-1325.
41. Greeno, J. and Moore, J. 1993. Situativity and symbols: Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17: 49-59.
42. Hauland, G. 2008. Measuring individual and team situation awareness during planning tasks in training of en route air traffic control. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 18: 290-304.
43. Hayhoe, M. and Ballard, D. H. 2005. Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 188-193.
44. Henderson, J. M. 2003. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, 7: 498-504.
45. Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Jeannot, E., Kelly, C. and Thompson, D. 2003. The development of situation awareness measures in ATM systems (Report HRS/HSP-005-REP-01), Brussels, Belgium: European Air Traffic Management Programme.
47. Joint Planning and Development Office. (2011). NextGen overview. http://www.jpdo.gov/
48. Jones, D. G. and Endsley, M. R. 1996. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 67: 507-512.
49. Kaber, D. B. and Endsley, M. R. 2004. The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5: 113-153.
50. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
51. Kerns, K. 1999. "Human factors in air traffic control/flight deck integration: Implications of data-link simulation research". In Handbook of aviation human factors, Edited by: Garland, D. J., Wise, J. A. and Hopkin, V. D. 519-546. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
52. Khazanchi, D. and Zigurs, I. 2006. Patterns for effective management of virtual projects: Theory and evidence. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 2: 25-48.
53. Kopardekar, P., Rhoades, J., Schwartz, A., Magyarits, S. and Willems, B. September 2008. Relationship of maximum manageable air traffic control complexity and sector capacity (AIAA-ATIO-2008-8885), September, Anchorage, AK: Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS 2008).
54. Lancaster, J. A. and Casali, J. G. 2008. Investigating pilot performance using mixed-modality simulated data Link. Human Factors, 50: 183-193.
55. Landry, S. J., Levin, K., Rowe, D. and Nickelson, M. 2010. Enabling collaborative work across different communities of practice through boundary objects: Field studies in air traffic management. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26: 75-93.
56. Langan-Fox, J., Sankey, M. and Canty, J. 2009. Human factors measurement for future air traffic control systems. Human Factors, 51: 595-637.
57. Langlois, J. and Roggman, L. 1990. Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1: 115-121.
58. Lee, P. U. 2005. "A non-linear relationship between controller workload and traffic count". In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 1129-1134.
59. Liversedge, S. P. and Findlay, J. M. 2000. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4: 6-14.
60. Lovell, J. and Kluger, J. 1994. Apollo 13, New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
61. Mayr, E. 1982. The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance, New York, NY: Harvard University Press.
62. Midkiff, A. and Hansman, R.J. 1993. Identification of Important 'Party Line' Information Elements and Implications for Situational Awareness in the Datalink Environment. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 1: 5-30.
63. Moray, N. 1990. Designing for transportation safety in the light of perception, attention, and mental models. Ergonomics, 33: 1201-1213.
64. Morgan, C., Kraut, J., Chiappe, D. and Vu, K-P. L. 2011. "An investigation into the potential sources of interference in SA probe techniques". In Manuscript in preparation
65. Morrow, D. and Rodvold, M. 1992. Analysis of problems in routine controller-pilot communication, August, Washington, DC: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
66. National Transportation Safety Board. (2010). Aviation statistical reports. http://www.ntsb.gov/data/table1.html
67. O'Brien, K. S. and O'Hare, D. 2007. Situational awareness ability and cognitive skills training in a complex realworld task. Ergonomics, 50: 1064-1091.
68. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. and Wickens, C. 2008. Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2: 140-160.
69. Pickering, M. J. and Garrod, S. 2004. Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27: 169-226.
70. Pickering, M. J. and Garrod, S. 2009. Prediction and embodiment in dialogue. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 1162-1168.
71. Pierce, R., Strybel, T. and Vu, K. September 2008. Comparing situation awareness measurement techniques in a low fidelity air traffic control simulation, September, Anchorage, AK: Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences.
72. Pohlman, D. L. and Fletcher, J. D. 1999. "Aviation personnel selection and training". In Handbook of aviation human factors, Edited by: Garland, D. J., Wise, J. A. and Hopkin, V. D. 277-308. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Rensink, R. 2000. The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7: 17-42.
74. Richardson, M. and Ball, L. J. 2009. Internal representations, external representations and ergonomics: Toward a theoretical integration. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10: 335-376.
75. Rognin, L., Grimaud, I., Hoffman, E. and Zhegal, K. 2004. "Assessing the impact of a new instruction on air traffic controller monitoring tasks". In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics 197-203.
76. Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 573-605.
77. Roske-Hofstrand, R. J. and Murphy, E. 1998. "Human information processing in air traffic control". In Human factors in air traffic control, Edited by: Smolensky, M. and Stein, E. 65-113. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
78. Rowlands, M. 1999. The body in mind: Understanding cognitive processes, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
79. Rupert, R. 2004. Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101: 389-428.
80. Rupert, R. 2009. Cognitive systems and the extended mind, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
81. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. and Tannenbaum, S. I. 1992. "Toward an understanding of team performance and training". In Teams: Their training and performance, Edited by: Swezey, R.W. and Salas, E. 3-29. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
82. Salmon, P., Stanton, N., Walker, G. and Green, D. 2006. Situation awareness measurement: A review of applicability for C4i environments. Applied Ergonomics, 37: 225-238.
83. Salmon, P., Stanton, N., Walker, G., Baber, C., Jenkins, D., McMaster, R. and Young, M. 2008. What is really going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 9: 297-323.
84. Salmon, P., Stanton, N., Walker, G., Jenkins, D., Ladva, D., Rafferty, L. A. and Young, M. 2009. Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39: 490-500.
85. Schober, M. F. 1993. Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition, 47: 1-24.
86. Smith, K. and Hancock, P.A. 1995. Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human Factors, 37: 137-148.
87. Stanton, N., Salmon, P., Walker, G. and Jenkins, D. 2009. Genotype and phenotype schemata and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10: 43-68.
88. Stanton, N., Salmon, P., Walker, G. H. and Jenkins, D. P. 2010. Is situation awareness all in the mind?. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11: 29-40.
89. Strybel, T. Z., Vu, K.-P. L., Bacon, P. L., Billinghurst, S., Rorie, R. C., Kraut, J. M., Morgan, C.,... and Johnson, W. May 2011. "Situation awareness, workload, and performance in midterm NextGen: Effect of dynamic variations in aircraft equipage levels". In Proceedings of the 2011 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology May, 118-123. Daytox, Ohio
90. Theiner, G., Allen, C. and Goldstone, R. 2010. Recognizing group cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 11: 378-395.
91. Vu, K-P L., Strybel, T., Battiste, V. and Johnson, W. 2012. "Factors influencing the decisions and actions of pilots and air traffic controllers in three plausible NextGen environments". In Cultural Factors in Systems Design: Decision Making and Action, Edited by: Proctor, R. W., Nof, S. and Yih, Y. 281-301. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
92. Weiskopf, D. 2010. The Goldilocks problem and extended cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 11: 313-323.
93. Wickens, C. D. 1992. Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd, New York, NY: Harper.
94. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2004. "Relevance theory". In The handbook of pragmatics, Edited by: Horn, L. R. and Ward, G. 607-632. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
95. Wilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9: 625-636.
96. Wilson, S. M., Saygun, A. P., Sereno, M. I. and Iacobini, M. 2004. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience, 7: 701-702.
97. Woods, D. D. and Sarter, N. 2010. Capturing the dynamics of attention control from individual to distributed systems: The shape of models to come. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11: 7-28.
98. Zhang, J. 1997. The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21: 179-217.
99. Zhang, J. and Norman, D. A. 1995. A representational analysis of numeration systems. Cognition, 57: 271-295.