Factors influencing the decisions and actions of pilots and air traffic controllers in three plausible nextgen environments

Cultural Factors in Systems Design: Decision Making and Action

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 281-301

  Vu, Kim Phuong L ^a   Strybel, Thomas Z ^a   Battiste, Vernol ^b,c   Johnson, Walter ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981740049     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Battiste, V., W. Johnson, S. Brandt, A. Q. Dao, and N. H. Johnson. 2008. Assessment of flight crew acceptance of automated resolutions suggestions and manual resolution tools. In Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS). Anchorage, AS: Optimage Ltd.
2. Dao, A.-Q. V., S. L. Brandt, P. Bacon, J. Kraut, J. Nguyen, K. Minakata, H. Raza, D. Rozovski, and W. W. Johnson. In press. Conflict resolution automation and pilot situation awareness. HCII 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
3. Dao, A.-Q. V., S. L. Brandt, V. Battiste, K.-P. L. Vu, T. Strybel, and W. Johnson. 2009. The impact of automation assisted aircraft separation on situation awareness. In M. J. Smith and G. Salvendy (eds.), Human Interface, Part II, HCII 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5618:738-47.
4. Durso, F. T., and A. Dattell. 2004. SPAM: The real-time assessment of SA. In A Cognitive Approach to Situation Awareness: Theory and Application, ed. S. Banbury and S. Tremblay, 137-54. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
5. Durso, F. T., and S. D. Gronlund. 1999. Situation awareness. In Handbook of Applied Cognition, ed. F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, and R. W. Schvaneveldt, 283-314. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Endsley, M. R. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32-64.
7. Erzberger, H. 2006. Automated conflict resolution for air traffic control. Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), Germany: Optimage Ltd.
8. Eurocontrol. 2011. Single Europen Sky. http://www.eurocontrol.int/dossiers/single-europeansky (accessed July 2, 2011).
9. FAA. 2010. NextGen Implementation Plan, March, 2010 [PDF File]. http://www.faa.gov (accessed June 1, 2010).
10. Gawron, V. J. 2000. Human peformance measures handbook. Mahwah, New Jersey: LEA Publishers.
11. Granada, S., A. Q. Dao, D. Wong, W. W. Johnson, and V. Battiste. 2005. Development and integration of a human-centered volumetric cockpit display for distributed air-ground operations. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Oklahoma City, OK: Wright State University.
12. Hart, S. G., and L. E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index):Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Human Mental Workload, ed. P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkahi, 139-83. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
13. Jentsch, F., J. Barnett, C. A. Bowers, and E. Salas. 1999. Who is flying this plane anyway? What mishaps tell us about crew member role assignment and air crew situation awareness. Hum Factors 41:1-14.
14. Joint Planning and Development Office. 2007. Concept of operations for the next genera tion air transportation system version 1.2. http://www.jpdo.gov/library/NextGenConOpsv12.pdf (retrieved October, 06, 2010).
15. Jones, D. G., and M. R. Endsley. 1996. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviat Space Environ Med 67(6):507-12.
16. Kerns, K. 1999. Human factors in air traffic control/flight deck integration: Implications of data-link simulation research. In D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise, and V. D. Hopkin (eds.), Handbook of Aviation Human Factors, 519-46. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
17. Kumar, U., and H. Malik. 2003. Analysis of fatal human error aircraft accidents in IAF. Indian J Aerosp Med 47:30-6.
18. Kurosu, M., and A. Hashizume. 2009. Culture and communication behavior: A research based on the artifact development analysis. In M. Kurosu (ed.), Human Centered Design, HCII 2009, LNCS 5619, 468-75. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
19. Li, W.-C., D. Harris, and A. Chen. 2007. Eastern minds in western cockpits: Meta-analysis of human factors in mishaps from three nations. Aviat Space Environ Med 78:420-5.
20. Ligda, S. V., A.-Q. V. Dao, T. Z. Strybel, K.-P. L. Vu, V. Battiste, and W. W. Johnson. 2010. Impact of conflict avoidance responsibility allocation on pilot workload in a distributed air traffic management system. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society’s 54th Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
21. Mackworth, J. F. 1969. Vigilance and Habituation. Middlesex, England: Penguin.
22. Mearns, K., R. Flin, and P. O’Connor. 2001. Sharing ‘worlds of risk’; improving communications with crew resource management. J Risk Res 4:377-92.
23. NASA. 2007. Next Generation Air Transportation System White Paper. http://www .aeronautics.nasa.gov/nextgen_whitepaper.htm (accessed June 13, 2010).
24. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2010. http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx (accessed August 25, 2010).
25. National Transportation Safety Board-Aviation Branch. 2010. http://www.ntsb.gov/aviation/Stats.htm (accessed August 25, 2010).
26. Parasuraman, R., and C. D. Wickens. 2008. Humans: Still vital after all these years of automation. Hum Factors 3:511-20.
27. Pierce, R., T. Strybel, and K.-P. L. Vu. 2008. Comparing situation awareness measurement techniques in a low fidelty air traffic control simuluation. In Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS). Anchorage, AS:Optimage Ltd.
28. Pierce, R., K.-P. L. Vu, J. Nguyen, and T. Strybel. 2008. The relationship between SPAM, workload, and task performance on a simulated ATC task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting, 34-8. New York: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
29. Pohlman, D. L., and J. D. Fletcher. 1999. Aviation personnel selection and training. In D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise, and V. D. Hopkin (eds.), Handbook of Aviation Human Factors. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Prevot, T. 2002. Exploring the many perspectives of distributed air traffic management:The Multi Aircraft Control System: MACS. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, HCI-Aero 2002, 23-5. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
31. Prevot, T., J. Homola, J. Mercer, M. Mainini, and C. Cabrall. 2009. Initial evaluation of air/ground operations with ground-based automated separation assurance. In Proceedings of the 8th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar. Napa, CA: Kluwer Publishers.
32. Rantanen, E. 2004. Development and Validation of Objective Performance and Workload Measures in Air Traffic Control. Technical Report AHFD-04-19/FAA-04-7, Federal Aviation Administration.
33. Rodgers, M. D., R. H. Mogford, and B. Strauch. 2000. Post hoc assessment of situation awareness in air traffic control incidents and major aircraft accidents. In Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, ed. M. Endsley and D. Garland, 73-112. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Strybel, T. Z., K. Minakata, J. Kraut, P. Bacon, V. Battiste, and W. Johnson. 2010. Diagnosticity of an online query technique for measuring pilot situation awareness in NextGen. In 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Salt Lake City, Utah: IEEE.
35. Thunholm, P. 2009. Military leaders and followers-do they have different decision styles. Scand J Psychol 50:317-24.
36. Vu, K.-P. L., Minakata, K., Nguyen, J, Kraut, J., & Raza, H. 2009. Situation awareness and performance of students versus experienced air traffic controllers. Human Interface, Part II, HCII 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5618, 865-74.
37. Vu, K.-P. L., T. Z. Strybel, J. Kraut, P. Bacon, J. Nguyen, K. Minakata, A. Rottermann, V. Battiste, and W. Johnson. 2010. Pilot versus controller workload and situation awareness under three traffic management concepts. In 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Salt Lake City, Utah: IEEE.