Drosophila ATM and ATR have distinct activities in the regulation of meiotic DNA damage and repair

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 195, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 359-367

  Joyce, Eric F ^a,b,d   Pedersen, Michael ^c   Tiong, Stanley ^c   White Brown, Sanese K ^a,b   Paul, Anshu ^a,b   Campbell, Shelagh D ^c   McKim, Kim S ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; MEIOTIC 41 PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; FEMALE; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; ANIMAL; CHROMATIN; DNA DAMAGE; DROSOPHILA; FLUORESCENCE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION;

ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; FLUORESCENCE; MEIOSIS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 84855719813     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201104121     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abdu, U., M. Brodsky, and T. Schüpbach. 2002. Activation of a meiotic checkpoint during Drosophila oogenesis regulates the translation of Gurken through Chk2/Mnk. Curr. Biol. 12:1645-1651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01165-X
2. Barchi, M., S. Mahadevaiah, M. Di Giacomo, F. Baudat, D.G. de Rooij, P.S. Burgoyne, M. Jasin, and S. Keeney. 2005. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:7203-7215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.16.7203-7215.2005
3. Barchi, M., I. Roig, M. Di Giacomo, D.G. de Rooij, S. Keeney, and M. Jasin. 2008. ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000076
4. -/- spermatocytes. J. Cell Sci. 118:3233-3245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02466
5. Bi, X., S.C. Wei, and Y.S. Rong. 2004. Telomere protection without a telomerase; the role of ATM and Mre11 in Drosophila telomere maintenance. Curr. Biol. 14:1348-1353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.063
6. Bi, X., M. Gong, D. Srikanta, and Y.S. Rong. 2005. Drosophila ATM and Mre11 are essential for the G2/M checkpoint induced by low-dose irradiation. Genetics. 171:845-847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047720
7. Burma, S., B.P. Chen, M. Murphy, A. Kurimasa, and D.J. Chen. 2001. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 276:42462-42467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C100466200
8. Chou, T.B., and N. Perrimon. 1992. Use of a yeast site-specific recombinase to produce female germline chimeras in Drosophila. Genetics. 131:643-653.
9. Clarkson, M., and R. Saint. 1999. A His2AvDGFP fusion gene complements a lethal His2AvD mutant allele and provides an in vivo marker for Drosophila chromosome behavior. DNA Cell Biol. 18:457-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/104454999315178
10. Costanzo, V., D. Shechter, P.J. Lupardus, K.A. Cimprich, M. Gottesman, and J. Gautier. 2003. An ATR- and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell. 11:203-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00799-2
11. Di Giacomo, M., M. Barchi, F. Baudat, W. Edelmann, S. Keeney, and M. Jasin. 2005. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:737-742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406212102
12. Ghabrial, A., and T. Schüpbach. 1999. Activation of a meiotic checkpoint regulates translation of Gurken during Drosophila oogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:354-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/14046
13. Ghabrial, A., R.P. Ray, and T. Schüpbach. 1998. okra and spindle-B encode components of the RAD52 DNA repair pathway and affect meiosis and patterning in Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev. 12:2711-2723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.17.2711
14. Gorski, M.M., R.J. Romeijn, J.C. Eeken, A.W. de Jong, B.L. van Veen, K. Szuhai, L.H. Mullenders, W. Ferro, and A. Pastink. 2004. Disruption of Drosophila Rad50 causes pupal lethality, the accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks and the induction of apoptosis in third instar larvae. DNA Repair (Amst.). 3:603-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.02.001
15. Hawley, R.S. 1988. Exchange and Chromosome Segregation in Eukaryotes. In Genetic Recombination. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. 743 pp.
16. Jaklevic, B.R., and T.T. Su. 2004. Relative contribution of DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and cell death to survival after DNA damage in Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 14:23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.032
17. Jang, J.K., D.E. Sherizen, R. Bhagat, E.A. Manheim, and K.S. McKim. 2003. Relationship of DNA double-strand breaks to synapsis in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 116:3069-3077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00614
18. Joyce, E.F., and K.S. McKim. 2009. Drosophila PCH2 is required for a pachytene checkpoint that monitors double-strand-break-independent events leading to meiotic crossover formation. Genetics. 181:39-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.093112
19. Keeney, S. 2001. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52:1-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(01)52008-6
20. King, R.C. 1970. Ovarian Development in Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York. 227 pp.
21. Kusch, T., L. Florens, W.H. Macdonald, S.K. Swanson, R.L. Glaser, J.R. Yates III, S.M. Abmayr, M.P. Washburn, and J.L. Workman. 2004. Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions. Science. 306:2084-2087. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1103455
22. Lantz, V., J.S. Chang, J.I. Horabin, D. Bopp, and P. Schedl. 1994. The Drosophila orb RNA-binding protein is required for the formation of the egg chamber and establishment of polarity. Genes Dev. 8:598-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.8.5.598
23. Laurençon, A., A. Purdy, J. Sekelsky, R.S. Hawley, and T.T. Su. 2003. Phenotypic analysis of separation-of-function alleles of MEI-41, Drosophila ATM/ATR. Genetics. 164:589-601.
24. Lee, N., H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, R.S. Jones, and Y. Zhang. 2009. The H3K4 demethylase lid associates with and inhibits histone deacetylase Rpd3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:1401-1410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01643-08
25. Madigan, J.P., H.L. Chotkowski, and R.L. Glaser. 2002. DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3698-3705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf496
26. McCaffrey, R., D. St Johnston, and A. González-Reyes. 2006. Drosophila mus301/spindle-C encodes a helicase with an essential role in doublestrand DNA break repair and meiotic progression. Genetics. 174:1273-1285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.058289
27. McKim, K.S., and A. Hayashi-Hagihara. 1998. mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: Evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved. Genes Dev. 12:2932-2942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.18.2932
28. McKim, K.S., E.F. Joyce, and J.K. Jang. 2009. Cytological analysis of meiosis in fixed Drosophila ovaries. Methods Mol. Biol. 558:197-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-103-5_12
29. Mehrotra, S., and K.S. McKim. 2006. Temporal analysis of meiotic DNA doublestrand break formation and repair in Drosophila females. PLoS Genet. 2:e200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020200
30. Page, S.L., and R.S. Hawley. 2001. c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein. Genes Dev. 15:3130-3143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.935001
31. Pedersen, M., S. Tiong, and S.D. Campbell. 2010. Molecular genetic characterization of Drosophila ATM conserved functional domains. Genome. 53:778-786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/G10-067
32. Queenan, A.M., G. Barcelo, C. Van Buskirk, and T. Schüpbach. 1999. The transmembrane region of Gurken is not required for biological activity, but is necessary for transport to the oocyte membrane in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 89:35-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00196-3
33. Queiroz-Machado, J., J. Perdigão, P. Simões-Carvalho, S. Herrmann, and C.E. Sunkel. 2001. tef: A mutation that causes telomere fusion and severe genome rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 110: 10-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004120000116
34. Shiloh, Y. 2006. The ATM-mediated DNA-damage response: Taking shape. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31:402-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2006.05.004
35. Sibon, O.C., A. Laurençon, R. Hawley, and W.E. Theurkauf. 1999. The Drosophila ATM homologue Mei-41 has an essential checkpoint function at the midblastula transition. Curr. Biol. 9:302-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80138-9
36. Silva, E., S. Tiong, M. Pedersen, E. Homola, A. Royou, B. Fasulo, G. Siriaco, and S.D. Campbell. 2004. ATM is required for telomere maintenance and chromosome stability during Drosophila development. Curr. Biol. 14: 1341-1347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.056
37. Song, Y.H., G. Mirey, M. Betson, D.A. Haber, and J. Settleman. 2004. The Drosophila ATM ortholog, dATM, mediates the response to ionizing radiation and to spontaneous DNA damage during development. Curr. Biol. 14:1354-1359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.064
38. Spradling, A.C. 1993a. Developmental Genetics of Oogenesis. In the Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 1564 pp.
39. Spradling, A.C. 1993b. Germline cysts: Communes that work. Cell. 72:649-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90393-5
40. Staeva-Vieira, E., S. Yoo, and R. Lehmann. 2003. An essential role of DmRad51/SpnA in DNA repair and meiotic checkpoint control. EMBO J. 22:5863-5874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg564
41. Stucki, M., and S.P. Jackson. 2006. gammaH2AX and MDC1: Anchoring the DNA-damage-response machinery to broken chromosomes. DNA Repair (Amst.). 5:534-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.01.012
42. Walker, M.Y., and R.S. Hawley. 2000. Hanging on to your homolog: The roles of pairing, synapsis and recombination in the maintenance of homolog adhesion. Chromosoma. 109:3-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004120050407
43. Ward, I.M., and J. Chen. 2001. Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATRdependent manner in response to replicational stress. J. Biol. Chem. 276:47759-47762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M009785200
44. Wyman, C., and R. Kanaar. 2006. DNA double-strand break repair: All's well that ends well. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40:363-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090451
45. Xu, Y., and D. Baltimore. 1996. Dual roles of ATM in the cellular response to radiation and in cell growth control. Genes Dev. 10:2401-2410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.10.19.2401
46. Youds, J.L., and S.J. Boulton. 2011. The choice in meiosis - defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation. J. Cell Sci. 124:501-513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.074427
47. Zou, L., and S.J. Elledge. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science. 300:1542-1548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1083430