Performance in the citing behavior of two student writers

Written Communication

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 55-103

  Harwood, Nigel ^a   Petrić, Bojana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

citation; interview study; second language writing; writing assignments; writing from sources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855586265     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088311424133     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Abasi A. R.,Akbari N.,Graves B.Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school.Journal of Second Language Writing. 2006;15:102-117.
2. Angélil-Carter S.Stolen language? Plagiarism in writing. Harlow, UK: Longman; 2000:.
3. Ashley H.Playing the game: Proficient working-class student writers' second voices.Research in the Teaching of English. 2001;35:493-524.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres (V. W. McGee, Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing process problems (pp. 134-165). New York, NY: Guildford.
6. Beaufort A.Developmental gains of a history major: A case for building a theory of disciplinary writing expertise.Research in the Teaching of English. 2004;39:136-185.
7. Borg, E. (2000). Citation practices in academic writing. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Patterns and perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practice (pp. 26-44). Reading, UK: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading.
8. Britton J.,Burgess T.,Martin N.,McLeod A.,Rosen H.The development of writing abilities. London, UK: Macmillan; 1975:11-18.
9. Brooks T. A.Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations.Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1985;36:223-229.
10. Burton V. T.,Chadwick S. A.Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use and criteria for use of Internet and library sources.Computers & Composition. 2000;17:309-328.
11. Butler J.Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge; 1990:.
12. Campbell, C. (1990). Writing with others' words: Using background reading text in academic compositions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 211-230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Canagarajah, S. (2004). Multilingual writers and the struggle for voice in academic discourse. In A. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp. 266-289). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
14. Candlin, C. N. (2000). General editor's preface. In K. Hyland (Ed.), Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing (pp. vi-xxi). Harlow, UK: Longman.
15. Casanave C. P.Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2002:.
16. Cheng A.Analyzing and enacting academic criticism: The case of an L2 graduate learner of academic writing.Journal of Second Language Writing. 2006;15:279-306.
17. Coffey A.,Atkinson P.Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1996:.
18. Cohen L.,Manion L.,Morrison K. R.Research methods in education. 2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer; 2007:.
19. Connor U.,McCagg P.Cross-cultural differences and perceived quality in written paraphrases of English expository prose.Applied Linguistics. 1983;4:259-268.
20. Cooper A.,Bikowski D.Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require?.Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2007;6:206-221.
21. Creswell J. W.Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007:.
22. Cronin B.The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London, UK: Taylor Graham; 1984:.
23. Crooks T. J.The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students.Review of Educational Research. 1988;58:438-481.
24. Currie P.Staying out of trouble: Apparent plagiarism and academic survival.Journal of Second Language Writing. 1998;7:1-18.
25. Davis P. M.,Cohen S. A.The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behaviour 1996-1999.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2001;52:309-314.
26. Dong Y. R.Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Nonnative doctoral students' dissertation writing in science.Research in the Teaching of English. 1996;30:428-457.
27. Dörnyei Z.Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2007:.
28. Flowerdew J.,Li Y.Language re-use among Chinese scientists writing for publication.Applied Linguistics. 2007;28:440-465.
29. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 695-727). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30. Geisler, C. (1991). Toward a sociocognitive model of literacy. Constructing mental models in a philosophical conversation. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 171-191). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
31. Gilbert N.Referencing as persuasion.Social Studies of Science. 1977;7:113-122.
32. Goffman E.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books; 1959:.
33. Grant-Davie, K. (1992). Coding data: Issues of validity, reliability, and interpretation. In G. Kirsch & P. A. Sullivan (Eds.), Methods and methodology in composition research (pp. 270-286). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
34. Greene, S., & Higgins, L. (1994). Once upon a time: The use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 115-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35. Groom, N. (2000). Attribution and averral revisited. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Patterns and perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practice (pp. 14-25). Reading, UK: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading.
36. Voices, identities, negotiations, and conflicts: Writing academic English across cultures. Ha P. L.Baurain B., ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2011:.
37. Hammersley M.Recent radical criticism of interview studies: Any implications for the sociology of education?.British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2003;24:119-126.
38. Harwood N.Citers' use of citees' names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study.Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 2008;59:1007-1011.
39. Harwood N.An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines.Journal of Pragmatics. 2009;41:497-518.
40. Hermanowicz J. C.The great interview: 25 strategies for studying people in bed.Qualitative Sociology. 2002;25:479-499.
41. Hirvela A.,Belcher D.Coming back to voice: The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers.Journal of Second Language Writing. 2001;10:83-106.
42. Holliday A.Doing and writing qualitative research. London, UK: SAGE; 1994:.
43. Howard R. M.Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. Stamford, CA: Ablex; 1999:.
44. Pluralizing plagiarism: Identities, contexts, pedagogies. Howard R. M.Robillard A. E., ed. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook; 2008:.
45. Ivanič R.Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins; 1998:.
46. Latour B.Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press; 1987:.
47. Leki I.Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007:.
48. Lillis T.Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London, UK: Routledge; 2001:.
49. Lillis T.Ethnography as method, methodology, and "deep theorizing": Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research.Written Communication. 2008;25:353-388.
50. Mason J.Qualitative researching. 2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London, UK: SAGE.London, UK: SAGE; 2002:.
51. Matsuda P.Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing.Journal of Second Language Writing. 2001;10:35-53.
52. McCarthy L.A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum.Research in the Teaching of English. 1987;21:233-265.
53. Miles M. B.,Huberman A. M.Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1994:.
54. Miller C. M. L.,Parlett M.Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. London, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education; 1974:.
55. Mishler E. G.Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1986:.
56. Nelson J.This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks.Research in the Teaching of English. 1990;24:362-396.
57. Newman M.The academic achievement game: Designs of undergraduates' efforts to get grades.Written Communication. 2001;18:470-505.
58. Nystrand M.A social-interactive model of writing.Written Communication. 1989;6:66-85.
59. Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Harrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 221-236). New York, NY: Longman.
60. Okamura A.Citation forms in scientific texts: Similarities and differences in L1 and L2 professional writing.Nordic Journal of English Studies. 2008;7:61-81.
61. Oppenheim C.,Smith R.Student citation practices in an information science department.Education for Information. 2001;19:299-323.
62. Ortner S. B.Making gender: The politics and erotics of culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1996:.
63. Patton M. Q.Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2002:.
64. Pecorari D.Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing.English for Specific Purposes. 2006;25:4-29.
65. Pecorari D.Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. London, UK: Continuum; 2008:.
66. PetrićB. (2006a). Citation practices in student academic writing (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
67. Petrić B.(2006b). Interdisciplinarity and writer identity: Students' views and experiences. In R. Kiely, G. Clibbon, P. Rea-Dickins, & H. Woodfield (Eds.), Language, culture, and identity in applied linguistics (pp. 119-131). London, UK: Equinox.
68. Prior P.Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998:.
69. Prior, P. (2004). Tracing process: How texts come into being. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it (pp. 167-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70. Radia P.,Stapleton P.Unconventional Internet genres and their impact on second language undergraduate students' writing process.The Internet and Higher Education. 2008;11:9-17.
71. Rock P.Chronocentrism and British criminology.British Journal of Sociology. 2005;56:473-491.
72. Samuelson B. L.Ventriloquation in discussions of student writing: Examples from a high school English class.Research in the Teaching of English. 2009;44:52-88.
73. Shen F.The classroom and the wider culture: Identity as a key to learning English composition.College Composition & Communication. 1989;40:459-466.
74. Shi L.Textual appropriation and citing behaviors of university undergraduates.Applied Linguistics. 2010;31:1-24.
75. Smagorinsky P.The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports.Written Communication. 2008;25:389-411.
76. Smagorinsky P.,Daigle E. A.,O'Donnell-Allen C.,Bynum S.Bullshit in academic writing: A protocol analysis of a high school senior's process of interpreting Much Ado about Nothing.Research in the Teaching of English. 2010;44:368-405.
77. Thompson P.,Tribble C.Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes.Language Learning & Technology. 2001;5:91-105.
78. Thompson G.,Ye Y.Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers.Applied Linguistics. 1991;12:365-382.
79. Tomlinson B.Talking about the composing process: The limitations of retrospective accounts.Written Communication. 1984;1:429-445.
80. Wette R.Evaluating student learning in a university-level EAP unit on writing using sources.Journal of Second Language Writing. 2010;19:158-177.
81. Woodward, K. (2004). Questions of identity. In K. Woodward (Ed.), Questioning identity: Gender, class, ethnicity (2nd ed., pp. 5-41). London, UK: Routledge and The Open University Press.
82. Yeh C.-C.Student researchers' citation behavior.Taiwan Journal of TESOL. 2009;6:1-21.