Semen analysis and sperm function testing

Asian Journal of Andrology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 6-13

  Franken, Daniel R ^a   Oehninger, Sergio ^b  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

male infertility; quality assurance; semen analysis; sperm concentration; sperm function; sperm morphology; sperm motility; spermatozoa

Indexed keywords

REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

ACROSOME; CELL STRUCTURE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MALE INFERTILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON DENSITY; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

AFRICA SOUTH OF THE SAHARA; EDUCATION; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; QUALITY CONTROL; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOA; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 84855454889     PISSN: 1008682X     EISSN: 17457262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.58     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Chong AR, Waiters CA, Weinrelb SA. The neglected laboratory test. The semen analysis. J Androl 1983; 4: 280-2.
2. McDonough P. Editorial comment: has traditional sperm analysis lost its clinical relevance? Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 585-7.
3. Agarwal A. What is the future of the sperm analysis. J Clin Embryol 2009; 12: 3-4.
4. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
5. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
6. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
7. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
8. Barratt CL, Dunphy BC, Thomas EJ, Cooke ID. Semen characteristics of 49 fertile males. Andrologia 1988; 20: 264-9.
9. Chia SE, Tay SK, Lim ST. What constitutes a normal seminal analysis? Semen parameters of 243 fertile men. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3394-8. (Pubitemid 29002629)
10. Gao J, Gao ES, Yang Q, Walker M, Wu JQ et al. Semen quality in a residential, geographic and age representative sample of healthy Chinese men. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 477-84. (Pubitemid 46152570)
11. Gao J, Gao ES, Walker M, Yang Q, Wu JQ et al. Reference values of semen parameters for healthy Chinese men. Urol Int 2008; 81: 256-62.
12. Lemcke B, Behre HM, Nieschlag E. Frequently subnormal semen profiles of normal volunteers recruited over 17 years. Int J Androl 1997; 20: 144-52. (Pubitemid 27470085)
13. Bostofte E, Serup J, Rebbe H. Has the fertility of Danish men declined through the years in terms of semen quality? A comparison of semen qualities between 1952 and 1972. Int J Fertil 1983; 28: 91-95. (Pubitemid 13034159)
14. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 16: 231-245.
15. Eliasson R. Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 26-32.
16. Zinaman MJ, Brown CC, Selevan SG, Clegg ED. Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with health couples. J Androl 2000; 21: 145-53. (Pubitemid 30069090)
17. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Ltvak P, Brazil C. Nakajima T et al. Sperm morphology, motility and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1388-93.
18. Björndahl L. The usefulness and significance of assessing rapidly progressive spermatozoa. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 33-5.
19. Handelsman DJ, Cooper TG. Afterword to Semen Analysis in 21st Century Medicine special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 118-23.
20. Cooper TG, Yeung CH. Computer-aided evaluation of assessment of 'grade a' spermatozoa by experienced technicians. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 220-4. (Pubitemid 43063449)
21. Larson KL, DeJonge CJ, Barnes AM, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1717-22. (Pubitemid 30636059)
22. Jouannet P, Ducot B, Spira A. Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics. Int J Androl 1988; 11: 379-94.
23. Douglas-Hamilton DH, Smith NG, Kuster CE, Vermeiden JP, Althouse GC. Particle distribution in low-volume capillary-loaded chambers. J Androl 2005; 26: 107-14. (Pubitemid 39665283)
24. Douglas-Hamilton DH, Smith NG, Kuster CE, Vermeiden JP, Althouse GC. Capillary-loaded particle fluid dynamics: effect on estimation of sperm concentration. J Androl 2005; 26: 115-22. (Pubitemid 39665284)
25. Bjorndahl L, Barratt CL. Semen analysis: setting standards for the measurement of sperm numbers. J Androl 2005; 26: 11. (Pubitemid 39665268)
26. Duran HE, Morshedi M, Kruger T, Oehninger S. Intrauterine insemination: a systematic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8: 373-84. (Pubitemid 34919251)
27. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, van der Merwe JP et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1118-23. (Pubitemid 17215837)
28. Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, van Zyl JH. The evaluation of morphologic characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 586-92. (Pubitemid 20250629)
29. Eggert-Kruse W, Reimann-Anderson J, Rohr G, Pohl S. Tilgen W et al. Clinical relevance of sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and relationship with sperm-mucus interaction in vivo and in vitro. Fertil Steril 1995: 63: 612-24.
30. van Waart J, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ, Ombelet W. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 495-500. (Pubitemid 32827550)
31. Jequier AM. Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A clinician's viewpoint. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2039-42. (Pubitemid 41418486)
32. Riddell D, Pacey A, Whittington K. Lack of compliance by UK andrology laboratories with World Health Organization recommendations for sperm morphology assessment. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3441-5. (Pubitemid 41742525)
33. Franken DR, Menkveld R, Kruger TF, Sekadde-Kigondu C, Lombard C. Monitoring technologist reading skills in a sperm morphology quality control program. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1637-43. (Pubitemid 36687944)
34. Franken DR, Kruger TF. Lessons learned from a sperm morphology quality control programme. Andrologia 2006; 3: 225-9. (Pubitemid 44690787)
35. Franken DR, Dada OA. Does training assist medical laboratory scientists with better evaluation of sperm morphology. Afr J Reprod Health 2007; 11: 3-8.
36. Holt WV. Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A spermatologist's viewpoint. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2983-6. (Pubitemid 41662643)
37. Castilla JA, Alvarez C, Aguilar J, González-Varea C, Gonzalvo MC et al. Influence of analytical and biological variation on the clinical interpretation of seminal parameters. Hum Reprod 2005; 21: 847-51.
38. Pacey AA. Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A view from the andrology laboratory. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1105-9.
39. Bjorndahl L, Barratt CL, Fraser LR, Kvist U, Mortimer D. ESHRE basic semen analysis courses 1995-1999: immediate beneficial of standardized training. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1299-305. (Pubitemid 34537366)
40. Franken DR. African experience with sperm morphology training courses. Reprod Med Online 2003; 7: 114-9. (Pubitemid 36874423)
41. Franken DR, Aneck-Hahn N, Kruger TF, Lombaard C. Semenology training programmes: 8 years experience. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2615-9.
42. Björndahl L, Söderlund I, Kvist U. Evaluation of the one step eosin nigrosin staining technique for human sperm vitality assessment. Hum Reprod2003; 18: 813-6. (Pubitemid 36426962)
43. Burkman LJ, Coddington CC, Franken DR, Kruger T, Rosenwaks Z et al. The hemizona assay (HZA): development of a diagnostic test for the binding of human spermatozoa to human hemizona pellucida to predict fertilization potential. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 688-95.
44. Liu DY, Baker HW. Morphology of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida of human oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 94: 71-84.
45. Muller CH. Rationale, interpretation, andrology lab corner validation, and uses of sperm function tests. J Androl 2000; 21: 10-30. (Pubitemid 30069078)
46. ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. Consensus Workshop on Advanced Diagnostic Andrology Techniques. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1463-79.
47. Oehninger SC, Franken DR, Sayed E, Barroso G, Kolm P. Sperm function and their predictive value fertilization outcome in IVF therapy: a meta analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 160-8. (Pubitemid 30182297)
48. Liu DY, Baker HW. Morphology of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida of human oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 94: 71-84.
49. Liu DY, Baker HW. Relationships between human sperm acrosin, acrosomes, morphology and fertilization in vitro. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 298-303. (Pubitemid 20253449)
50. Esterhuizen AD, Franken DR, Lourens JG, Prinsloo E, van Rooyen LH. Sperm chromatin packaging as an indicator of in vitro fertilisation rates. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 657-61. (Pubitemid 30142380)
51. Bastiaan HS, Windt ML, Menkveld R, Kruger TF, Oehninger S et al. Relationship between zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction, sperm morphology, sperm-zona pellucida binding, and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 49-55. (Pubitemid 36071238)
52. Menkveld R, El-Garem Y, Schill WB, Henkel R. Relationship between human sperm morphology and acrosomal function. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003; 20: 432-8. (Pubitemid 37429511)
53. Menkveld R, Franken DR, Kruger TF, Oehninger S, Hodgen GD. Sperm selection capacity of the human zona pellucida. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 30: 346-52.
54. Liu DY, Baker HW. Morphology of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida of human oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 94: 71-84.
55. Liu DY, Baker HW. The proportion of human sperm with poor morphology but normal intact acrosomes detected with Pisum sativum agglutinin correlates with fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 288-93.
56. Menkveld R, Rhemrev JP, Franken DR, Vermeiden JP, Kruger TF. Acrosomal morphology as a novel criterion for male fertility diagnosis: relation with acrosin activity, morphology (strict criteria), and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 637-44. (Pubitemid 26069124)
57. Aitken RJ, de Iuliis GN. Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 727-33. (Pubitemid 46951708)
58. Aitken RJ, de Iuliis GN. On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16: 3-13.
59. Gorczyca W, Traganos F, Jesionowska H, Darzynkiewicz Z. Presence of DNA strand breaks and increased sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation in abnormal human sperm cells: analogy to apoptosis of somatic cells. Exp Cell Res 1993; 207: 202-5. (Pubitemid 23192183)
60. Hughes C, Lewis S, McKelvey-Martin V, Thompson W. A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2: 613-9. (Pubitemid 126720782)
61. Tomlinson MJ, Moffatt O, Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, Afnan M et al. Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2160-5. (Pubitemid 32951911)
62. Fernandez JL, Vazquez-Gundin F, Delgado A, Goyanes VJ, Ramiro-Diaz J, et al. DNA breakage detection-FISH (DBD-FISH) in human spermatozoa: technical variants evidence different structural features. Mutat Res 2005; 453: 77-82.
63. Fernandez JL, Muriel L, Rivero MT, Goyanes V, Vazquez R et al. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl 2003; 24: 59-66. (Pubitemid 44698494)
64. Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science 1990; 210: 1131-3.
65. Sakkas D, Alvarez JG. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 1027-36.
66. Evenson DP, Wixon R. Comparison of the Halosperm test kit with the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) infertility test in relation to patient diagnosis and prognosis. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 846-9. (Pubitemid 41414569)
67. French DB, Sabanegh Jr ES, Goldfarb J, Desai N. Does severe teratozoospermia affect blastocyst formation, live birth rate, and other clinical outcome parameters in ICSI cycles? Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 1097-103.
68. Avendaño C, Franchi A, Duran H, Oehninger S. DNA fragmentation of normal spermatozoa negatively impacts embryo quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 549-57.
69. Avendaño C, Franchi A, Taylor S, Morshedi M, Bocca S et al. Fragmentation of DNA in orphologically normal human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2009. 91, 1077-84.
70. Avendaño C, Oehninger S. DNA fragmentation in morphologically normal spermatozoa: how much should we be concerned in the ICSI era? J Androl 2011. 32; 356-63.
71. Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 823-31. (Pubitemid 351491237)
72. Menkveld R, Franken DR, Kruger TF, Oehninger S, Hodgen GD. Sperm selection capacity of the human zona pellucida. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 30: 346-52.
73. Liu DY, Baker HW. Tests of human sperm function and fertilization invitro. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 465-83.
74. Liu DY, Baker HW. The proportion of human sperm with poor morphology but normal intact acrosomes detected with Pisum sativum agglutinin correlates with fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 288-93.
75. Menkveld R, Rhemrev JP, Franken DR, Vermeiden JP, Kruger TF. Acrosomal morphology as a novel criterion for male fertility diagnosis: Relation with acrosin activity, morphology (strict criteria), and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 637-44. (Pubitemid 26069124)
76. Franken DR, Bastiaan HS, Kidson A, Wranz P, Habenicht UF. Zona pellucida mediated acrosome reaction and sperm morphology. Andrologia 1997; 29: 311-7. (Pubitemid 27515195)
77. Franken DR, Esterhuizen A, Oehninger SC. Diagnostic impact of the zona pellucida induced acrosome reaction in an assisted reproductive programme. Embryo Talk 2007; 2: 3-9.
78. Overstreet JW, Hembree WC. Penetration of zona pellucida of non-living human oocytes by human spermatozoa in vitro. Fertil Steril 1976; 27: 815-31.
79. Jeyendran RS, van der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJ. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil 94;70: 219-28.
80. Barratt CL, Osborn R, Harrison PF, Monks N, Dunphy BC et al. The hypo-osmotic swelling test and the sperm mucus penetration test in determining the fertilization of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 430-4. (Pubitemid 19144682)
81. Peeraer K, Nijs M, Raick D, Ombelet W, Dunphy BC. Pregnancy after ICSI with ejaculated immotile spermatozoa from a patient with immotile cilia syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Reprod Biomed Online2004; 9: 659-63. (Pubitemid 40028884)
82. Wolff H. The biologic significance of white blood cells in semen. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 1143-57.
83. Henkel R, Kierspel E, Stalf T, Mehnert C, Menkveld R et al. Effect of reactive oxygen species produced by spermatozoa and leukocytes on sperm functions in non-leukocytospermic patients. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 635-42. (Pubitemid 40348575)
84. Chance B, Sies H, Boveris H. Hydroperoxide metabolism in mammalian organs. Physiol Rev 1979; 59: 527-605. (Pubitemid 9236599)
85. Gomez E, Buckingham D, Brindle J, Lanzafame F, Irvine DS et al. Development of an image analysis system to monitor the retention of residual cytoplasm by human spermatozoa: correlation with biochemical markers of the cytoplasmic space, oxidative stress and sperm function. J Androl 1996; 17: 276-87.
86. Keating J, Grundy CE, Fivey PS, Elliott M, Robinson J. Investigation of the association between the presence of cytoplasmic residues on the human sperm midpiece and defective sperm function. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 110: 71-7.
87. Aitken RJ, Fisher HM, Fulton N, Gomez E, Knox W et al. Reactive oxygen species generation by human spermatozoa is induced by exogenous NADPH and inhibited by the flavoprotein inhibitors diphenylene iodonium and quinacrine. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 47: 468-82. (Pubitemid 27273158)
88. Aziz N, Saleh RA, Sharma RK, Lewis-Jones I, Esfandiari N et al. Novel association between sperm reactive oxygen species production, sperm morphological defects, and the sperm deformity index. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 349-54. (Pubitemid 38223915)
89. Henkel R, Kierspel E, Hajimohammad M, Stalf T, Hoogendijk C et al. DNA fragmentation of spermatozoa and ART. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 7: 477-84.
90. de Iuliis GN, Wingate JK, Koppers AJ, McLaughlin EA, Aitken RJ. Definitive evidence for the nonmitochondrial production of superoxide anion by human spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 1968-75.
91. Koppers AJ, de Iuliis GN, Finnie JM, McLaughlin EA, Aitken RJ. Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 3199-207.
92. Koppers AJ, Garg ML, Aitken RJ. Stimulation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production by unesterified, unsaturated fatty acids in defective human spermatozoa. Free Radic Biol Med 2010; 48: 112-9.
93. Oehninger S. Clinical management of male infertility in assisted reproduction: ICSI and beyond. Int J Androl 2011; 34: e319-29.
94. Agarwal A, Monette Bragais FM, Sabanegh E. Assessing sperm function. Urol Clin N Am 2008; 35: 157-71. (Pubitemid 351514781)
95. Menkveld R, Holleboom CA, Rhemrev JP. Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. Asian J Androl 2011; 13: 59-68.