Measurement and significance of sperm morphology

Asian Journal of Andrology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 59-68

  Menkveld, Roelof ^a   Holleboom, Cas A G ^b   Rhemrev, Johann P T ^b  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b MEDICAL CENTER HAAGLANDEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

human spermmorphology; male fertility potential; strict criteria; traditional or liberal criteria; WHO manual for semen analysis

Indexed keywords

CRITERION VARIABLE; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; HUMAN; MORPHOMETRICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REFERENCE VALUE; REVIEW; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM;

CELL SHAPE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 78650983145     PISSN: 1008682X     EISSN: 17457262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.67     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Cary WH. Sterility diagnosis: the study of sperm cell migration in female secretions and interpretation of findings. NY State J Med 1930; 30: 131-6.
2. Moench GL, Holt H. Sperm morphology in relation to fertility. Am J Obstet Gyncol 1931; 22: 199-210.
3. Williams WW. Spermatic abnormalities. N Engl J Med 1937; 217: 946-51.
4. Hammen R. Studies on impaired fertility in man with special reference to the male. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1944; 24(Suppl 3): 1-205.
5. MacLeod J. Gold RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. IV. Sperm morphology in fertile and infertile marriage. Fertil Steril 1952; 2: 394-414.
6. Eliasson R. Standards for investigation of human semen. Andrologie 1971; 3: 49-64.
7. Eliasson R. Analysis of semen. In: Behrman SJ, Kistner SW, editors. Progress in Infertility. 2nd ed. Boston, , CA: Little, Brown & Co.; 1975. pp691-713.
8. Freund M. Standards for the rating of human sperm morphology. Int J Fertil 1966; 11: 97-118.
9. Katz DF, Overstreet JW, Samuals SJ, Niswander PW, Bloom TD et al. Morphometric analysis of spermatozoa in the assessment of human male infertility. J Androl 1986; 7: 203-10.
10. Eliasson R. Analysis of semen. In: Burger H, de Kretser D, editors. The Testis. New York: Raven Press; 1981. pp381-99.
11. Menkveld R, Kruger TF. Basic semen analysis. In: Acosta AA, Swanson RJ, Ackerman SB, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA, Menkveld R, editors. Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction. Baltimore, , MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1990. pp68-84.
12. Cary WH, Hotchkiss RS. Semen appraisal. A differential stain that advances the study of cell morphology. JAMA 1934; 102: 587-90.
13. Fredricsson B, Sennerstam R. Morphology of live seminal and postcoital cervical spermatozoa and its bearing on human fertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63: 329-33.
14. Fredricsson B, Bjö rk G. Morphology of postcoital spermatozoa in the cervical secretion and its clinical significance. Fertil Steril 1977; 28: 841-5.
15. Mortimer D, Leslie EE, Kelley RW, Templeton AA. Morphological selection of human spermatozoa in vivo and in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1982; 64: 391-9.
16. Katz DF, Diel l, Overstreet JW. Differences in the movement of morphologically normal and abnormal human seminal spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1982; 26: 566-70.
17. Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 586-92.
18. Menkveld R, Franken DR, Kruger TF, Oehninger S. Sperm selection capacity of the human zona pellucida. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 30: 346-52.
19. Liu DY, Baker HW. Morphology of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida of human oocytes that failed to fertilized in vitro. J Fertil Reprod 1992; 94: 71-84.
20. Garrett C, Baker HW. A new fully automated system for the morphometric analysis of human sperm heads. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 1306-17.
21. Comhaire F, Schoonjans F, Vermeulen L, de Clercq N. Methodological aspects of sperm morphology evaluation: comparison between strict and liberal criteria. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 857-61.
22. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 1st ed. Singapore: Press Concern; 1980.
23. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
24. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
25. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
26. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organisation Press; 2010.
27. Morgentaler A, Fung MY, Harris DH, Powers RD, Alper MM. Sperm morphology and in vitro fertilization outcome: a direct comparison of World Health Organization and strict criteria methodologies. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 1177-82.
28. Eliasson R. Basic semen analysis. In: Matson P, editor. Current Topics in Andrology. Perth, , WA: Ladybrook Publishing; 2003. pp35-89.
29. Eliasson R. Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 26-32.
30. Menkveld R, Kruger TF. Basic semen analysis. In: Acosta AA, Kruger TF, editors. Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction. 2nd ed. Carnforth: Parthenon Publishing; 1996. pp53-71.
31. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF et al. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112-7.
32. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, van der Merwe JP et al. Sperm morphological features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1118-23.
33. Grow DR, Oehninger S, Seltman HJ, Toner JP, Swanson RJ et al. Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: probing the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 559-67.
34. Oehninger S, Acosta AA. Kruger TF, Veeck LL, Flood J et al. Failure of fertilization in in vitro fertilization: the occult male factor. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1988; 5: 181-7.
35. Menkveld R. Clinical significance of the normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the 5th WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 47-58.
36. Handelsman DJ, Cooper TG. Afterword to Semen Analysis in 21st Century Medical special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 118-23.
37. Auger J. Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics? Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 36-46.
38. Nelson CM, Bunge RG. Semen analysis: evidence for changing parameters of male fertility potential. Fertil Steril 1974; 25: 503-7.
39. MacLeod J, Gold RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoon counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol 1951; 66: 436-9.
40. Menkveld R, van Zyl JA, Kotze TJ, Joubert G. Possible changes in male fertility over a 15-year period. Arch Androl 1986; 17: 143-4.
41. Auger J, Kunstmann JM, Czyglik F, Jouannet P. Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years. N Eng J Med 1995; 332: 281-5.
42. Benshushan A, Shoshani O, Paltiel O, Schenker JG, Lewin A. Is there really a decrease in sperm parameters among healthy young men? A survey of sperm donations during years. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997; 14: 347-53.
43. Chen Z, Isaacson KB, Toth TL, Godfrey-Bailey L, Schiff I et al. Temporal trends in human semen parameters in New England in the United Stated, 1989-2000. Arch Androl 2003; 49: 369-74.
44. Menkveld R, Wong WY, Lombard CJ, Wetzels AM, Thomas CM et al. Semen parameters including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardisation of in vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1165-71.
45. Haugen TB, Egeland T, Magnus Ø. Semen parameters in Norwegian fertile men. Int J Androl 2006; 27: 66-71.
46. Ombelet W, Bosmans E, Janssen M, Cox A, Vlasselaer J et al. Semen parameters in a fertile versus subfertile population: a need for a change in the interpretation of semen testing. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 987-93.
47. Zinaman MJ, Brown CC, Selevan SG, Clegg ED. Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with health couples. J Androl 2000; 21: 145-53.
48. Gü nalp S, Onculoglu C, Gurgan T, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ. A study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: an attempt to develop clinical thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 110-4.
49. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST et al. Sperm morphology, motility and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1388-93.
50. Jedrzejczak P, Taszarek-Hauke G, Hauke J, Pawelczyk l, Duleda AJ. Prediction of spontaneous conception based on semen parameters. Int J Androl 2007; 31: 499-507.
51. Ombelet W, Bosmans E, Cox A, Janssen M, Mestdagh G et al. In search for the general populations semen profile: the study of sperm parameters in partners of women with chronic anovulation. F V V Obstet Gyn 2009; 1: 18-26.
52. Hotchkiss RS. Factors in stability and variability of semen specimens-observations on 640 successive samples from 23 men. J Urol 1941; 45: 875-88.
53. Hartmann GC, Schoenfeld C, Copelande E. Individualism in the seminal picture of infertile men. Fertil Steril 1964; 15: 231-53.
54. MacLeod J. Human seminal cytology as a sensitive indicator of the germinal epithelium. Int J Fertil 1964; 9: 281-95.
55. Kihaile P, Hirotsuru K, Kumasako Y, Misumi J, Utsunomiya T. Fertilization rrates of small-headed sperm in conventional IVF and ICSI. Arch Androl 2003; 49: 327-9.
56. Poland ML, Moghissi KS, Giblin PT, Ager JW, Olson JM. Stability of basic semen measures and abnormal morphology within individuals. J Androl 1986; 7: 211-4.
57. Yeung CH, Tü ttelmann F, Bergmann M, Nordhoff V, Vorona E et al. Coiled sperm from infertile patients: characteristics, associated factors and biological implications.Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 1288-95.
58. Williams WW, Salvage A. Observations on the seminal micro-pathology of bulls. Cornell Vet 1925; 15: 353-75.
59. Moench GL, Holt H. Sperm morphology in relation to fertility. Am J Obstet Gyncol 1931; 22: 199-210.
60. Menkveld R. The basic semen analysis. In: Oehninger S, Kruger TF, editors. Male Infertility: Diagnosis and Treatment. Oxon: Informa Healthcare; 2007. pp141-70.
61. Menkveld R, Rhemrev JP, Franken DR, Vermeiden JP, Kruger TF. Acrosomal morphology as a novel criterion for male fertility diagnosis: relation with acrosin activity, morphology (strict criteria) and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 637-4.
62. Maree L, du Plessis SS, Menkveld R, van der Horst G. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1369-82.
63. Menkveld R, El-Garem Y, Schill WB, Henkel R. Relationship between human sperm acrosomal morphology and acrosomal function. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003; 20: 432-8.
64. Gandini L, Lombardo F, Paoli D, Caponecchia L, Familiari G et al. Study of apoptotic fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 830-9.
65. Kahraman S, Akarsu C, Cengiz G, Dirican K, Sözen E et al. Fertility of ejaculated and testicular megalohead spermatozoa with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 726-30.
66. Chelli MH, Albert M, Ray PF, Guthauser B, Izard V et al. Can intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection be used to select normal-sized sperm heads in infertile patients with macrocephlic sperm head syndrome? Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 1347.e1-7.
67. Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Urner F, Campana A, Sakkas D. Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2: 139-44.
68. Toth A. Reversible effect of salicylazosulfapyridine on semen quality. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 538-40.
69. Cosentino MJ, Chey WY, Takihara H, Cockett AT. The effects of sulfasalazine on human male fertility potential and seminal prosdaglandins. J Urol 1984; 132: 682-6.
70. Riley SA, Lecarpentier J, Mani V, Goodman MJ, Mandal BK et al. Sulphasalazine induced seminal abnormalities in ulcerative colitis: results of mesalazine substitution. Gut 1987; 28: 1008-12.
71. Menkveld R, Kruger TF. Sperm morphology and male urogenital infections. Andrologia 1998; 30(Suppl 1): 49-53.
72. Prisant N, Escalier D, Soufir JC, Morillion M, Schoevaert D et al. Ultrastructural nuclear defects and increased chromosome aueuploidies in spermatozoa with elongated heads. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1052-9.
73. Osawa Y, Sueoka K, Iwata S, Shinohara M, Kobayashi N et al. Assessment of the dominant abnormal form is useful for predicting the outcome if intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the case of sever teratozoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16: 436-42.
74. Menkveld R. Leukocytospermia. In: Daya S, Harrison RF, Kempers RD, editors. Advances in Fertility and Reproductive Medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV; 2004. pp218-24.
75. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Abasi A, Razavi S, Ashrafi S, Tavalaee M. Varicocelectomy: semen parameters and protamine deficiency. Int J Androl 2009; 32: 115-22.
76. Toth A. Abnormal seminal cytology in a patient with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 818-20.
77. Blom E. The ultrastructure of some characteristic sperm defects and a proposal for a new classification of bull spermiogram. Nord Vet Med 1973; 25: 383-91. Danish.
78. Rousso D, Kourtis A, Mavromatidis G, Gkoutzioulis F, Makedos G et al. Pyriform head: a frequent but little-studied morphological abnormality of sperm. Arch Androl 2002; 48: 267-72.
79. Fenster L, Katz DF, Wyrobek AJ, Rempel DM, Oman D et al. Effect of psychological stress on human semen quality. J Androl 1997; 18: 194-202.
80. te Velde E, Burdorf A, Nieschlag E, Eijkemans R, Kremer JA, et al. Is human fecundity declining in Western countries? Hum Reprod. 2010, 25: 1348-1353
81. Kvist U, Björndahl L, editors. Manual on Basic Semen Analysis. ESHRE Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.