Foreword to semen analysis in 21st century medicine special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology

Asian Journal of Andrology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 7-10

  Handelsman, David J ^a   Cooper, Trevor G ^b  

^a ANZAC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b INST OF REPRO MED OF THE UNIV   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANDROLOGY; CONTRACEPTION; EDITORIAL; EJACULATION; FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LABORATORY TEST; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MALE INFERTILITY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; OLIGOSPERMIA; POSTCOITAL TEST; PUBLISHING; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; UTERINE CERVIX MUCUS; ACCURACY; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TYPE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED SPERM MORPHOLOGISER; NOTE; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE VALUE; SPERMATOZOON PENETRATION; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ANDROLOGY; CONTRACEPTION; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; MANUALS AS TOPIC; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOA; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; REFERENCE VALUES;

REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

EID: 76349095810     PISSN: 1008682X     EISSN: 17457262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/aja.2009.49     Document Type: Editorial

References (27)

1. Hotchkiss RS. Fertility In Men: A Clinical Study of the Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Impaired Fertility in Men. Philadelphia: J B Lippincott Company, 1944.
2. Macomber D, Sanders MB. The spermatozoa count: its value in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sterility. N Engl J Med 1929; 200: 981-984
3. WHO task forces in contraception. IPPF Med Bull 1973; 7: 3-4.
4. Waites GM. Development of methods of male contraception: impact of the World Health Organization Task Force. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1-15.
5. Aitken RJ. Whither must spermatozoa wander? The future of laboratory seminology. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 99-103.
6. Amann RP. Tests to measure the quality of spermatozoa at spermiation. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 71-78
7. Auger J. Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics? Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 36-46.
8. Björndahl L. The usefulness and significance of assessing rapidly progressive spermatozoa. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 33-35
9. Brazil C. Practical semen analysis: from A to Z. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 14-20.
10. Eliasson R. Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 26-32.
11. Ford WC. Comments on the release of the 5th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 59-63.
12. Jequier AM. Semen analysis: a new manual and its application to the understanding of semen and its pathology. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 11-13
13. Lamb DJ. Semen analysis in 21st century medicine: the need for sperm function testing. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 64-70.
14. Menkveld R. Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 47-58.
15. Pacey AA. Quality assurance and quality control in laboratory andrology. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 21-25
16. Boyd JC. Defining laboratory reference values and decision limits: populations, intervals, and interpretations. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 83-90.
17. Bonde JP. Semen analysis from an epidemiologic perspective.Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 91-94
18. Joffe M. Semen quality analysis and the idea of normal fertility.Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 79-82.
19. Skakkebaek NE. Normal reference ranges for semen quality and their relations to fecundity. Asian J Androl 2010; 12: 95-98
20. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, et al., World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2009 Nov 24. [Epub ahead of print].
21. Henny J, Petitclerc C, Fuentes-Arderiu X, Petersen PH, Queraltó JM, et al., Need for revisiting the concept of reference values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000; 38: 589-595
22. Grimes DA, Lopez LM. "Oligozoospermia," "azoospermia, " and other semen-analysis terminology: the need for better science. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 1491-1494
23. Ng KK, Donat R, Chan L, Lalak A, Di Pierro I, et al., Sperm output of older men. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1811-1815
24. Jequier AM. Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A clinician's viewpoint. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2039-2042
25. Holt WV. Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A spermatologist's viewpoint. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2983-2986
26. Cooper TG, Yeung CH. A flow cytometric technique using peanut agglutinin for evaluating acrosomal loss from human spermatozoa. J Androl 1998; 19: 542-550
27. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. Value of DNA integrity assays for fertility evaluation. Soc Reprod Fertil 2007; 65 (Suppl): 81-92.