Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 152-163

  Andrews, Sally ^a   Lo, Steson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Lexical access; Lexical quality; Masked priming; Reading; Spelling

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; READING; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855288807     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024953     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Acheson D.J., Wells J.B., MacDonald M. New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:278-289. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.278.
2. Andrews S. Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35:775-800. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0040.
3. Andrews S. Lexical expertise and reading skill. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 2008, 247-281. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA. B.H. Ross (Ed.).
4. Andrews, S. (in press). Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition: The role of lexical quality. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition: Vol. 2. Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
5. Andrews S., Bond R. Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity. Reading and Writing 2009, 22:687-711. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9137-7.
6. Andrews S., Hersch J. Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2010, 139:299-318. doi: 10.1037/a0018366.
7. Baayen R.H., Davison D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:390-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
8. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM] 1993, University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium, Pittsburgh, PA.
9. Bates D.M., Maechler M., Dai B. lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-34. [Software] 2010, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
10. Box G.E.P., Cox D.R. An analysis of transformations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 1964, 26:211-252.
11. Castles A., Davis C., Cavalot P., Forster K. Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2007, 97:165-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006.
12. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J.T., Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance VI 1977, 535-555. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Dornic (Ed.).
13. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204.
14. Cunningham A.E., Stanovich K.E. Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology 1997, 33:934-945. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934.
15. Davis C.J. Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioral data and current models. From inkmarks to ideas: Challenges and controversies about word recognition and reading 2006, 180-206. Academic Press, New York, NY. S. Andrews (Ed.).
16. Davis C.J. The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review 2010, 117:713-758. doi: 10.1037/a0019738.
17. Davis C.J., Lupker S.J. Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:668-687. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668.
18. Ehri L. Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. The science of reading: A handbook 2005, Blackwell, Cornwall, United Kingdom, doi: 10.1002/9780470757642.ch8. M.J. Snowling, C. Hulme (Eds.).
19. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984, 10:680-698. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680.
20. Forster K.I., Davis C., Schoknecht C., Carter R. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 1987, 39:211-251.
21. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 35:116-124. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503.
22. Forster K.I., Taft M. Bodies, antibodies and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:844-863. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.844.
23. Frith U. Unexpected spelling problems. Cognitive processes in spelling 1980, 495-515. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom. U. Frith (Ed.).
24. Grainger J. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:1-35. doi: 10.1080/01690960701578013.
25. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518.
26. Guerrera C., Forster K.I. Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:117-142. doi: 10.1080/01690960701579722.
27. Jolliffe I.T. Principal component analysis 2004, Springer, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
28. Keenan J.M., Olson R.K., Betjemann Assessment and etiology of individual differences in reading comprehension. Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension 2008, 227-245. Guilford, New York, NY. R.K. Wagner, C. Schatschneider, C. Phythian-Sence (Eds.).
29. Kinoshita S., Lupker S. Masked priming: The state of the art 2003, Psychology Press, New York, NY.
30. Kliegl R., Masson M.E., Richter E.M. A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition 2010, 18:655-681. doi: 10.1080/13506280902986058.
31. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.
32. Nation K. Form-meaning links in the development of visual word recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Section B: Biological Sciences 2009, 364:3665-3674. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0119.
33. Perea M., Carreiras M. Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:418-422. doi: 10.3758/BF03193863.
34. Perfetti C.A. The representation problem in reading acquisition. Reading acquisition 1992, 145-174. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri, R. Treiman (Eds.).
35. Perfetti C.A. Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 2007, 11:357-383. doi: 10.1080/10888430701530730.
36. Perfetti C.A., Landi N., Oakhill J. The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. The science of reading: A handbook 2005, 227-247. Blackwell, Cornwall, United Kingdom, doi: 10.1002/9780470757642.ch13. M.J. Snowling, C. Hulme (Eds.).
37. Perry J.R., Lupker S.J., Davis C.J. An evaluation of the interactive-activation model using masked partial-word priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:36-68. doi: 10.1080/01690960701578112.
38. Rastle K., Coltheart M. Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations?. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, 3-24. Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom. S. Andrews (Ed.).
39. Schoonbaert S., Grainger J. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19:333-367.
40. Segui J., Grainger J. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:65-76. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65.
41. Seidenberg M.S., Plaut D.C. Progress in understanding word reading: Data fitting vs. theory building. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, 25-49. Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom. S. Andrews (Ed.).
42. Share D.L. Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 1995, 55:151-218. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2.
43. Share D.L. Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2004, 87:267-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001.
44. Wagner R.K., Schatschneider C., Phythian-Sence C. Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension 2009, Guilford, New York, NY.
45. Ziegler J.C., Rey A., Jacobs A. Simulating individual word identification thresholds and errors in the fragmentation task. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:490-501. doi: 10.3758/BF03201158.