New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 278-289

  Acheson, Daniel J ^a   Wells, Justine B ^a   MacDonald, Maryellen C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; RECOGNITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 43249086531     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.278     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ALLEN, L., CIPIELEWSKI, J., & STANOVICH, K. E. (1992). Multiple indicators of children's reading habits and attitudes: Construct validity and cognitive correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 489-503.
2. ANDERSON, R. C., WILSON, P. T., & FIELDING, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 285-303.
3. ANG, C. H., & NOBLE, J. P. (1993). Incremental validity of ACT assessment scores and high school course information for freshman course placement ACT Research Report Series, 93-95. Available at www.act .org/research/reports/index.html.
4. BANDURA, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. BEECH, J. R. (2002). Individual differences in mature readers in reading, spelling, and grapheme-phoneme conversion. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning. Personality, Social, 21, 121-132.
6. BIBER, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62, 384-414.
7. CATTELL, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
8. CHATEAU, D., & JARED, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition process. Memory & Cognition, 28, 143-153.
9. CIPIELEWSKI, J., & STANOVICH, K, E. (1992). Predicting growth in reading ability from children's exposure to print. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 74-89.
10. COHEN, S. (1971). Effects of task, interval and order of presentation on time estimation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 33, 101-102.
11. CUNNINGHAM, A. E., & STANOVICH, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733-740.
12. CUNNINGHAM, A. E., & STANOVICH, K. E. (1991). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 423-441.
13. DANEMAN, M., & CARPENTER, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450-466.
14. ENNIS, P. H. (1965). Adult book reading in the United States (National Opinion Research Center Report No. 105). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. FRIJTERS, J. C., BARRON, R. W., & BRUNELLO, M. (2000). Direct and mediated influences of home literacy and literacy interest on prereaders' oral vocabulary and early written language skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 466-477.
16. GREANEY, V. (1980). Factors related to amount and type of leisure time reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 337-357.
17. GUAY, M. (1982). Long-term retention of temporal information. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 54, 843-849.
18. GUTHRIE, J. T. (1981). Reading in New Zealand: Achievement and volume. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 6-27.
19. JUST, M. A., & CARPENTER, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 98, 122-149.
20. JUST, M. A., CARPENTER, P. A., & WOOLLEY, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 111, 228-238.
21. KENNEDY, A., & MURRAY, W. S. (1984). Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 833-849.
22. KING, J., & JUST, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 580-602.
23. LEWIS, R., & TEALE, W. (1980). Another look at secondary school students' attitudes toward reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 189-201.
24. MACDONALD, M. C., & CHRISTIANSEN, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35-54.
25. MCBRIDE-CHANG, C., MANIS, F. R., SEIDENBERG, M. S., CUSTODIO, R. G., & DOI, L. M. (1993). Print exposure as a predictor of word reading and reading comprehension in disabled and nondisabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 230-238.
26. MITCHELL, D. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 375-409). New York: Academic Press.
27. NOBLE, J. (1988). Estimating reading skill from ACT achievement scores (ACT Research Report 88). Available at www.act.org/research/reports/ index.html.
28. NOBLE, J. (1991). Predicting college grades from ACT assessment scores and high school coursework and grade information (ACT Research Report 91-3). Available at www.act.org/research/reports/ index.html.
29. PEARLMUTTER, N. J., & MACDONALD, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 521-542.
30. SCRIBNER, S., & COLE, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. SHARON, A. T. (1973-1974). What do adults read? Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 148-169.
32. SIMON, H. A., & NEWELL, A. (1974). Thinking processes. In D. H. Krantz & R. C. Atkinson (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathemati cal psychology: I. Learning, memory and thinking (pp. 101-144). Oxford: Freeman.
33. STANOVICH, K. E., & CUNNINGHAM, A. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20, 51-68.
34. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433.
35. STANOVICH, K. E., WEST, R. F., & HARRISON, M. R. (1995). Knowledge growth and maintenance across the life span: The role of print exposure. Developmental Psychology, 31, 811-826.
36. STIGGINS, R. J., SCHMEISER, C. B., & FERGUSON, R. L. (1978). Validity of the ACT assessment as an indicator of reading ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 337-344.
37. STRINGER, R., & STANOVICH, K. E. (2000). The connection between reaction time and variation in reading ability: Unraveling covariance relationships with cognitive ability and phonological sensitivity. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 41-53.
38. WATERS, G. S., & CAPLAN, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 51-79.
39. WEST, R. F., STANOVICH, K. E., & MITCHELL, H. R. (1993). Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 35-50.
40. ZILL, N., & WINGLEE, M. (1990). Who reads literature? The future of the United States as a nation of readers. Cabin John, MD: Seven Locks Press.