Simulating individual word identification thresholds and errors in the fragmentation task

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 490-501

  Ziegler, Johannes C ^a   Rey, Arnaud ^a   Jacobs, Arthur M ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ERROR; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MODEL; PERCEPTION; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0031957101     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03201158     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ANDREWS, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. ANDREWS, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 234-254.
3. BERENT, I., & PERFETTI, C. A. (1995). A rose is a reez: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
4. BROWN, P., LUPKER, S. J., & COLOMBO, L. (1994). Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 537-554.
5. CARAMAZZA, A. (1992). Is cognitive neuropsychology possible? Journal of Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 80-95.
6. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
7. CUTLER, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition, 10, 65-70.
8. DELL, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 405-434.
9. ELMAN, J. L. (1995). Language as a dynamical system. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion (pp. 196-225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. FORSTER, K. I., & CHAMBERS, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 12, 627-635.
11. FRAUENFELDER, U., BAAYEN, R. H., HELLWIG, F. M., & SCHREUDER, R. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 781-804.
12. GRAINGER, J., & JACOBS, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: Effects of positional letter frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 951-964.
13. GRAINGER, J., & JACOBS, A. M. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further considerations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1158-1176.
14. GRAINGER, J., & JACOBS, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
15. GRAINGER, J., O'REGAN, J. K., JACOBS, A. M., & SEGUI, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
16. GRAINGER, J., O'REGAN, J. K., JACOBS, A. M., & SEGUI, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 49-56.
17. HUNTSMAN, L. A., & LIMA, S. D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 417-429.
18. IMBS, P. (1971). Études statistiques sur le vocabulaire français: Dictionnaire des fréquences. Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et XXe siècles [Statistical analysis of French vocabulary: Frequency dictionary. Vocabulary from the 19th and 20th centuries]. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.
19. JACOBS, A. M., & GRAINGER, J. (1992). Testing a semi-stochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
20. JACOBS, A. M., REY, A., ZIEGLER, J. C., & GRAINGER, J. (in press). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Symbolic connectionist approaches to human cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. KAWAMOTO, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 474-516.
22. KAWAMOTO, A. H., & ZEMBLIDGE, J. (1992). Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 349-374.
23. LANDAUER, T. K., & STREETER, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 12, 119-131.
24. LEMAIRE, P., & SIEGLER, R. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 83-97.
25. MASSARO, D. W., & COHEN, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1107-1128.
26. MASSARO, D. W., JASTRZEMBSKI, J. E., & LUCAS, P. A. (1981). Frequency, orthographic regularity, and lexical status in letter and word perception. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 163-200). New York: Academic Press.
27. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
28. MONSELL, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. PAAP, K., & JOHANSEN, L. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 1129-1157.
30. PEEREMAN, R., & CONTENT, A. (1995). The neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 409-421.
31. REDER, L. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90-137.
32. REDER, L. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 227-259). New York: Academic Press.
33. REY, A., ZIEGLER, J. C., MONTANT, M., & JACOBS, A. M. (1996, September). Static and dynamic approaches to letter perception. Paper presented at the 9th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Würzburg.
34. RUMELHART, D. E., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
35. RUMELHART, D. E., & SIPLE, P. (1974). The process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review, 81, 99-118.
36. SCHADE, U., & BERG, T. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production: Part 2. The simulation perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 435-462.
37. SEARS, C. R., HINO, Y., & LUPKER, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 876-900.
38. SIEGLER, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 250-264.
39. SNODGRASS, J. G., & MINTZER, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Memory & Cognition, 21, 247-266.
40. SNODGRASS, J. G., & POSTER, M. (1992). Visual-word recognition thresholds for screen-fragmented names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 24, 1-15.
41. SPERLING, G., & DOSHER, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 2.4-2.65). New York: Wiley.
42. SPIELER, D. H., & BALOTA, D. A. (1996, November). Current connectionist models of word naming: What they can and cannot do. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
43. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 744-774.
44. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
45. TREIMAN, R., MULLENNIX, J., BIJELJAC-BABIC, R., & RICHMONDWELTY, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
46. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128-134.
47. VAN ORDEN, G. C., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
48. VAN ORDEN, G. C., PENNINGTON, B. F., & STONE, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
49. WARRINGTON, E. K., & WEISKRANTZ, L. (1968). New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients. Nature, 217, 972-974.
50. WATERS, G. S., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557-572.
51. ZIEGLER, J. C., & JACOBS, A. M. (1995). Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 567-593.
52. ZIEGLER, J. C., JACOBS, A. M., & STONE, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504-515.
53. ZIEGLER, J. C., MONTANT, M., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in French. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 533-554.
54. ZIEGLER, J. C., STONE, G. O., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). What's the pronunciation for _ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback inconsistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600-618.
55. ZIEGLER, J. C., VAN ORDEN, G. C., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 845-860.