Using protein binding site prediction to improve protein docking

Gene

Volumn 422, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 14-21

  Huang, Bingding ^a   Schroeder, Michael ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; ENZYME INHIBITOR COMPLEX; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GEOMETRY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; WEB BROWSER;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 49049105131     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aytuna A.S., Gursoy A., and Keskin O. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 21 12 (2005) 2850-2855
2. Berchmanski A., Katchalski Katzir E., and Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 571-587
3. Bradford J., and Westhead D. Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics 21 8 (2005) 1487-1494
4. Camacho C., Gatchell D., Kimura S., and Vajda S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 40 3 (2000) 525-537
5. Chen H., and Zhou H.X. Prediction of interface residues in protein-protein complexes by a consensus neural network method: test against NMR data. Proteins 61 1 (2005) 21-35
6. Chen R., and Weng Z. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking. Proteins 51 (2003) 397-408
7. Connolly M. Analytical molecular surface calculation. J. Appl. Cryst. 16 (1983) 548-558
8. Decanniere K., Transue T., Desmyter A., Maes D., Muyldermans S., and Wyns L. Degenerate interfaces in antigen-antibody complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 313 (2001) 473-478
9. Dominguez C., Boelens R., and Bonvin A. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical and/or biophysical information. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 1731-1737
10. Eisenstein M., and Katchalski-Katzir E. On proteins, grids, correlations, and docking. C. R., Biol. 327 (2004) 409-420
11. Espadaler J., Romero-Isart O., Jackson R.M., and Oliva B. Prediction of protein-protein interactions using distant conservation of sequence patterns and structure relationships. Bioinformatics 21 16 (2005) 3360-3368
12. Gabb H., Jackson R., and Sternberg M. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J. Mol. Biol. 272 1 (1997) 106-120
13. Glaser F., Steinberg D., Vakser I., and Ben-Tal N. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 43 (2001) 82-102
14. Gottschalk K., Neuvirth H., and Schreiber G. A novel method for scoring of docked protein complexes using predicted protein-protein binding sites. Protein Eng. 17 (2004) 183-189
15. Gray J., et al. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 331 (2003) 281-299
16. Halperin I., Ma B., Wolfson H., and Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 47 (2002) 409-443
17. Huang B., and Schroder M. Using residue propensities and tightness of fit to improve rigid-body protein-protein docking. In: Rarey M., Torda A., Kurtz S., and Willhoeft U. (Eds). Proceedings of German Bioinformatics Conference (2005) 159-173
18. Huang B., and Schroeder M. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation. BMC Struct. Biol. 6 (2006) 19
19. Hubbard, S., 1996. Naccess http://wolf.bms.umist.ac.uk/naccess.
20. Jackson R. Comparison of protein-protein interactions in serine protease-inhibitor and antibody-antigen complexes: implications for the protein docking problem. Protein Sci. 8 (1999) 603-613
21. Janin J., et al. Capri: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 52 (2003) 2-9
22. Jones S., and Thornton J. Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J. Mol. Biol. 272 (1997) 121-132
23. Jones S., and Thornton J. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patches analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 272 (1997) 133-143
24. Katchalski-Katzir E., Shariv I., Eisenstein M., Friesem A., Aflalo C., and Vakser I. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. PNAS 89 (1992) 2195-3199
25. Kohlbacher O., and Lenhof H. BALL - rapid software prototyping in computational molecular biology. Bioinformatics 16 9 (2000) 815-824
26. Liang S., Zhang C., Liu S., and Zhou Y. Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucl. Acids Res. 34 13 (2006) 3698-3707
27. Lichtarge O., Bourne H.R., and Cohen F.E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257 2 (1996) 342-358
28. Li C., Ma X., Chen W., and Wan C. A protein-protein docking algorithm dependent on the type of complexes. Protein Eng. 16 (2003) 265-269
29. Li L., Chen R., and Zhiping W. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins 53 3 (2003) 693-707
30. Mandell J., et al. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng. 14 (2001) 103-113
31. Mendez R., R. L., Maria L., and Wodak S. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 52 (2003) 51-67
32. Mendez R., Leplae R., Lensink M.F., and Wodak S.J. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 60 2 (2005) 150-169
33. Mintseris J., et al. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins 60 2 (2005) 214-216
34. Moont G., Gabb H., and Sternberg M. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 35 3 (1999) 364-373
35. Murzin A., Brenner S., Hubbard T., and Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247 (1995) 536-540
36. Neuvirth H., Raz R., and Schreiber G. Promate: A structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 338 (2004) 181-199
37. Porollo A., and Meller J. Prediction-based finger-prints of protein-protein interactions. Proteins 66 3 (2007) 630-645
38. Recio J., Totrov M., and Abagyan R. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 280-291
39. Ritchie D., and Kemp J. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 39 2 (2000) 178-194
40. Smith G., and Sternberg M. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 28-35
41. Sternberg M., Gabb H., and Jackson R. Predictive docking of protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct Biol. 8 2 (1998) 265-269
42. Vries S.D., van Dirj A., and Bonvin A. WHISCY: What information does surface conservation yield? Application to data-driven docking. Proteins 63 3 (2006) 479-489
43. Zhou H., and Shan Y. Prediction of protein interaction sites from sequence profile and residue neighbor list. Proteins 44 3 (2001) 336-343