Use of tomosynthesis in intraoperative digital specimen radiography - Is a reduction of breast re-excision rates possible?;Einsatz der Tomosynthese in der intraoperativen digitalen Präparate-Radiografie - Ist eine Reduktion der Mammareexzisionsrate möglich?

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde

Volumn 71, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1080-1084

  Schulz Wendtland, R ^a   Dilbat, G ^b   Bani, M R ^a   Lux, M P ^a   Meier Meitinger, M ^a   Wenkel, E ^a   Schwab, S ^a   Beckmann, M W ^a   Uder, M ^a   Adamietz, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b Radiological Practice Roth and Weissenburg ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

breast; mammary gland tumor; mammographic density

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; REPEAT PROCEDURE;

EID: 84655163761     PISSN: 00165751     EISSN: 14388804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1280427     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kaufmann M, Rody A. Breast cancer: reduced mortality by early detection and adjuvant therapy. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2009; 69 218 232
2. Katalinic A. Breast cancer: declining mortality despite its increasing incidence. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2009; 69 237 239
3. Beckmann MW, Blohmer JU, Costa SD et al. Zurich consensus: German expert opinion on the St. Gallen votes on 15 March 2009 (11th international conference at St. Gallen: primary therapy of early breast cancer) 2009 St. Gallen conference: primary therapy of early breast cancer opinion among German experts (Zurich 2009). Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2009; 69 377 383
4. Ruckhaberle E, Solbach C, Kaufmann M. Conference report on the 31st annual San Antonio breast cancer symposium, December 1014, 2008 Continuing change in diagnostics and therapy of breast cancers from molecular basics to tailored therapy Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2009; 69 202 211
5. Ruckhaberle E, Rody A, Kaufmann M. Report of the 32nd annual San Antonio breast cancer symposium, December 1013, 2009 An international scientific symposium for interaction and exchange among basic scientists and clinicians in breast cancer Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2010; 70 177 183
6. Fasching PA, Fehm T, Janni W et al. Breast cancer therapy a state of the art review. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2010; 70 875 886
7. Perry NM. Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. Eur J Cancer: 2001; 37 159 172 (Pubitemid 32144692)
8. Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T et al. Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol: 2007; 17 581 588 (Pubitemid 46140332)
9. Albert US. Hrsg. S3-Leitlinie Brustkrebs-Frherkennung in Deutschland. 1. Aktualisierung 2008. Mnchen W. Zuckschwerdt-Verlag: 2008; http://www.senologie. org
10. Kreienberg R, Kopp I, Albert U et al. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. 1. Aktualisierung. Mnchen W. Zuckschwerdt-Verlag: 2008; http://www.senologie.org
11. DOrsi CJ. Management of the breast specimen. Radiology: 1995; 194 297 302
12. Diekmann F, Grebe S, Bick U et al. Digitale intraoperative Prparateradiographie bei diagnostischen Exzisionen nicht palpabler Lsionen der Brust. Fortschr Rntgenstr: 2000; 172 969 971 (Pubitemid 32059039)
13. Grunert J-H, Flemming P, Borchert B et al. Vergrerungsprparateradiographie als Qualittskontrolle der Mikrokalkerfassung im Rahmen der histopathologischen Aufarbeitung von Mammabiopsiegewebe. Fortschr Rntgenstr: 2000; 172 68 72 (Pubitemid 30114877)
14. Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. EJSO: 2009; 35 32 37
15. Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Wacker T et al. Quo vadis? Trends in digital mammography. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2009; 69 108 117
16. Grunert J-H, Wiechmann U, Gmelin E. Kompressionsfreie Mammaprparateradiographie in 2 Ebenen mit Hilfe eines Radiographiecontainers. Fortschr Rntgenstr: 2003; 175 413 417 (Pubitemid 36395967)
17. Krzl R, Baltzer J, Lohe KJ. Intraoperative specimen radiography in mammographically suspected, non palpable breast lesions. Experiences with the Faxitron unit. Fortschr Med: 1979; 97 1688 1690 (Pubitemid 10239125)
18. Krzl R, Lohe KJ, Baltzer J et al. Radiography used during operations for biopsies of non-palpable lesions of the breast which have been suspected because of mammography. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod: 1981; 10 431 434 (Pubitemid 11031786)
19. Moritz JD, Westerhof JP, Funke M et al. Ein neues Prparatradiographiegert mit maximal 20facher Vergrerung für die Mammadiagnostik. Fortschr Rntgenstr: 1998; 168 133 138 (Pubitemid 28114266)
20. Grunert JH, Borchert B, Farber A et al. Mikrokalknachweis in Mamma-Exzisionsprparaten mit Hilfe der DIMA-Vergrerungsprparateradiographie vierfach im Vergleich zur konventionellen Vergrerungsradiographie eineinhalbfach. Fortschr Rntgenstr: 1999; 171 302 306 (Pubitemid 29519152)
21. Muttalib M, Tisdall M, Scawn R et al. Intra-operative specimen analysis using faxitron microradiography for excision of mammographically suspicious, non-palpable breast lesions. The Breast: 2004; 13 307 315 (Pubitemid 39172731)
22. Schulz-Wendtland R, Bani MR, Lux MP et al. CMOS Technologie für intraoperative digitale Prparateradiografien. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2011; 71 525 529
23. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology: 1997; 205 399 406 (Pubitemid 27467317)
24. Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Lell M et al. Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system. Rfo: 2006; 178 1219 1223
25. Schulz-Wendtland R, Fuchsjger M, Wacker T et al. Digital mammography: an update. Eur J Radiol: 2009; 72 258 265
26. Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. AJR: 2008; 190 865 869 (Pubitemid 351571506)
27. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR: 2009; 193 586 591
28. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR: 2007; 189 616 623 (Pubitemid 47328544)
29. Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, van den Bosch MA et al. Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol: 2010; 20 16 24
30. Kontos D, Bakic PR, Carton AK et al. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study. Acad Radiol: 2009; 16 283 298
31. Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann K-P, Wenkel E et al. Vergleich der klinischen Wertigkeit von Zielaufnahmen mit reduzierter Pixelgre des Detektors und digitalem Monitorzooming bei der Beurteilung von Mikrokalzifikationen in der digitalen Mammographie. Fortschr Rntgenstr: 2007; 179 492 496 (Pubitemid 46769651)
32. Haygood TM, Arribas E, Brennan PC et al. Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. Acad Radiol: 2009; 16 1509 1517
33. Kim MJ, Youk JH, Kang DR et al. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs. digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications. Br J Radiol: 2010; 83 486 492
34. Koutalonis M, Delis H, Pascoal A et al. Can electronic zoom replace magnification in mammography? BJR: 2010; 83 569 577