Magnified radiographs as quality control for detection of microcalcifications in histopathology of breast biopsies;Vergrosserungspraparateradiographie als qualitatskontrolle der mikrokalkerfassung im rahmen der histopathologischen aufarbeitung von mammabiopsiegewebe

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 68-72

  Grunert, J H ^a   Flemming, P ^a   Borchert, B ^a   Farber, A ^a   Gmelin, E ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biopsycontainer; Breast cancer; DIMA magnification radiography; Microcalcifications; Specimen radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PAPILLOMA; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAPILLOMA; RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0034053076     PISSN: 09366652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ramsey SG, Lauer CS. Use of a specimen-evaluation device for the diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions detected by mammography. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 244-246
2. Alberhasky MT. Mammographic and gross pathologic analysis of breast needle localization specimens. Use of a tissue analysis device. Am J Clin Pathol 1989; 92: 452-457
3. Champ CS, Mason H, Coghill SB, Robinson M. A perspex grid for localization of non-palpable mammographic lesions in breast biopsies. Histopathology 1989; 14: 311-315
4. Chilcote WA, Davis GA, Suchy P, Paushter DM. Breast specimen radiography: evaluation of a compression device. Radiology 1988; 168: 425-427
5. Moritz JD, Luftner-Nagel S, Westerhof JP, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E. A comparison of conventional mammographic magnification, ultra high magnification and industrial magnification radiography in the radiographic detection of microcalcifications within core biopsies of the breast. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 1099-1103
6. Moritz JD, Westerhof JP, Funke M, Breiter N, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E. Ein neues Präparateradiographiegerät mit maximal 20-facher Vergröfßerung für die Mammadiagnostik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1998; 168: 133-138
7. Böcker W, Decker T, Ruhnke M, Schneider W. Duktale Hyperplasie und duktales Carcinoma in situ. Definition - Klassifikation -Differentialdiagnose. Pathologe 1997; 18: 3-18
8. Anton HW, Junkermann H, Wolf G, TeubnerJ. Lokalisation nichtpalpabler Läsionen in der Mammographie zur präoperativen Markierungund Gewebeentnahme. Radiologe 1993; 33: 271-276
9. Armstrong JS, Davies JD. Laboratory handling of impalpable breast lesions: A review. J Clin Pathol 1990; 44: 89-93
10. Holland R. The rote of specimen x-ray in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Diagn Imaging Clin Med 1985; 54: 178-185
11. D'Orsi CJ. Management of the breast specimen. Radiology 1995; 194: 297-302
12. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL. Processing and evaluation of breast excision specimens. A clinical oriented approach. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1992; 98: 125-137
13. Sloane JP, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N, Bellocq JP, Bianchi S, Bökker W, Bussolati G, Connolly CE, De Miguel C, Dervan P, Drijkoningen R, Elston CW, Faverly D, Gad A, Holland R, Jacquemier J, Lacerda M, Lindgren A, Martinez-Penuela J, Pertese JL, Rank F, Tsakraklides V, de Wolf C, Zafrani B. Leitlinien für die Pathologie -Anhang zu den Europäischen Leitlinien für die Qualitätssicherung beim Mammographiescreening. Pathologe 1997; 18: 71-88
14. Niemann TH, Lucas JG, Marsh WL Jr. To freeze or not to freeze. A comparison of methods for the handling of breast biopsies with no palpable abnormality. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106: 225-228