A new specimen radiography system with maximal 20fold magnification for breast specimens;Ein neues praparatradiographiegerat mit maximal 20facher vergrosserung fur die mammadiagnostik

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Neuen Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 133-138

  Moritz, J D ^a   Westerhof, J P ^a   Funke, M ^a   Breiter, N ^a   Oestmann, J W ^a   Grabbe, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital radiography; Magnification radiography; Mammography; Microcalcifications; Specimen radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST DISEASE; CALCINOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; IN VITRO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; CALCINOSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION;

EID: 0031893478     PISSN: 09366652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Feig SA, Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB, Maidment AD, Mawdsley GE, Jong RA. Full-field digital mammography: system development and image evaluation (abstr.). Radiology 1995; 197: 170
2. Ferrant W, San Nicoló MR. Die förderliche Röntgenvergrößerung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1954; 81: 194-205
3. Frappart L, Remy I, Hu Chi Lin, Bremond A, Raudrant D, Grousson B, Vauzelle JL Different types of microcalcifications observed in breast pathology. Correlations with histopathological diagnosis and radiological examination of operative specimens. Virchows Arch (Pathol Anat) 1986; 410: 179-187
4. Frappart L, Boudeulle M, Boumendil J et al. Structure and composition of microcalcifications in benign and malignant lesions of the breast: Study by light microscopy, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, microprobe analysis, and xray diffraction. Hum Pathol 1984; 15: 880-889
5. Friedrich M. Technik und Ergebnisse der Mammographie. Radiologe 1993; 33: 243-259
6. Gebureck P, Fredow G, Sperner W. Anlagenkonzept eines Mikrofokusröntgensystems für die klinische Anwendung. Radiologe 1991; 31: 407-412
7. Holland R. The role of specimen x-ray in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Diagn Imag Clin Med 1985; 54: 178-185
8. Homer MJ, Safaii H, Smith TJ. Marchant DJ. The relationship of mammographic microcalcification to histologic malignancy: radiologie-pathologie correlation. Amer J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 1187-1189
9. Kronholz H-L Direktradiographische Vergrößerung und Strahlenexposition. Radiologe 1991; 31: 413-417
10. Lanyi M. Differential diagnosis of microcalcifications. In: Friedrich M, Sickles EA (Hrsg.): Radiological diagnosis of breast diseases. Berlin: Springer 1997: 89-136
11. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994; 192: 793-795
12. Liberman L Evans WP 3 rd, Dershaw DD, Hann LE, Deutch BM, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology 1994; 190: 223-225
13. Moritz JD, Luftner-Nagel S, Westerhof JP, Oestmann J-W, Grabbe E: Formaldehyde fixative induced dissolution of breast microcalcifications in core biopsies. Radiology 1996; 200: 361-363
14. Murphy WA, DeSchryver-Kecskeneti K. Isolated clustered microcalcifications in the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1978; 127: 335-341
15. Oestmann JW, Kopans DB, Linetsky L, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, White G, Swann C, Kelley JE, Johnson LL Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications. Radiology 1988; 168: 657-659
16. Powell RW, McSweeney MB, Wilson CE. X-ray calcifications as the only basis for breast biopsy. Ann Surg 1983; 197: 555-559
17. Reuther G. Kronholz HL Direktradiographische Vergrößerung in Kombination mit digitaler Radiographie für die Skelettdiagnostik. Radiologe 1991; 31: 424-429
18. Stargardt A, Angerstein W. Der optimale Abbildungsmaßstab bei der direkten Röntgenvergrößerung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1975; 123: 73-78
19. Stomper PC, Connolly JL, Meyer JE, Harris JR. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989; 172: 235-241
20. Stomper PC, Davis SP. Sonnenfeld MR, Meyer JE, Greenes RA, Eberlein TJ. Efficacy of specimen radiography of clinically occult noncalcified breast lesions. Amer J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 43-47
21. Teubner J, Lenk JZ, Wenz KU, Georgi M. Vergrößerungsmammographie mit 0,1 mm Mikrofokus. Radiologe 1987; 27: 155-164
22. Winckler S, Richter KD. Direktradiographische Vergrößerung bei Knocheninfektionen. Radiologe 1991; 31: 447-451
23. Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB, Maidment AD, Lewkow R, Mawdsley GE, Starkoski BG. Clinical digital mammography system: initial results (abstr.). Radiology 1994; 193: 361
24. Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography. In: Haus AG, Yaffe MJ (ed.): Syllabus: A categorical course in physics. Technical aspects of breast imaging. RSNA 1994; 275-286