Independent Distractor Frequency and Age-of-acquisition Effects in picture-Word interference: FMRI evidence for post-lexical and Lexical Accounts according to Distractor type

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 482-495

  de Zubicaray, Greig I ^a   Miozzo, Michele ^b   Johnson, Kori ^a   Schiller, Niels O ^c   McMahon, Katie L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DRAWING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; PICTURE WORD INTERFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84555177852     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00141     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Acheson, D. J., Hamidi, M., Binder, J. R., & Postle, B. R. (2011). A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1358-1367.
2. Alario, F. X., Chainay, H., Lehericy, S., & Cohen, L. (2006). The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production. Brain Research, 1076, 129-143.
3. Ashburner, J. (2007). A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage, 38, 95-113.
4. Barry, C., Hirsh, K. W., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 350-375.
5. Belke, E., Brysbaert, M., Meyer, A. S., & Ghyselinck, M. (2005). Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: Evidence for a lexical semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition, 96, B45-B54.
6. Bles, M., & Jansma, B. M. (2008). Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 20.
7. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546.
8. Brysbaert, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2011). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 545-559.
9. Brysbaert, M., & Ghyselinck, M. (2006). The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly independent. Visual Cognition, 12, 992-1011.
10. Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977-990.
11. Catling, J. C., Dent, K., Johnston, R. A., & Balding, R. (2010). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1304-1317.
12. Catling, J. C., & Johnston, R. A. (2009). The varying effects of age of acquisition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 50-62.
13. Christoffels, I. K., Formisano, E., & Schiller, N. O. (2007). Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: An fMRI study employing overt speech. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 868-879.
14. Cortese, M. J., & Khanna, M. M. (2007). Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1072-1082.
15. de Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M. M., & Pringle, A. (2006). Top-down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 864-873.
16. de Zubicaray, G. I., Wilson, S. J., McMahon, K. L., & Muthiah, S. (2001). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: An event-related fMRI study employing overt responses. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 218-227.
17. Dean, M. P., Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. (2001). Interference from related items in object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 733-743.
18. Dell, G. S., & Sullivan, J. M. (2004). Speech errors and language production: Neuropsychological and connectionist perspectives. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 63-108). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
19. Dent, K., Johnston, R. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming: A dual task investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 282-301.
20. Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 878-891.
21. Eden, G. F., Joseph, J. E., Brown, H. E., Brown, C. P., & Zeffiro, T. A. (1999). Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavioral interleaved gradients technique. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 41, 13-20.
22. Eickhoff, S. B., Heim, S., Zilles, K., & Amunts, K. (2009). A systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 367, 2399-2421.
23. Eickhoff, S. B., Stephan, K. E., Mohlberg, H., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., Amunts, K., et al. (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage, 25, 1325-1335.
24. Elliott, M. R., Bowtell, R. W., & Morris, P. G. (1999). The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 41, 1230-1235.
25. Ellis, A., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1103-1123.
26. Ellis, A. W., Burani, C., Izura, C., Bromiley, A., & Venneri, A. (2006). Traces of vocabulary acquisition in the brain: Evidence from covert object naming. Neuroimage, 33, 958-968.
27. Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203-233.
28. Freire, L., Roche, A., & Mangin, J. F. (2002). What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21, 470-484.
29. Friston, K. J., Glaser, D. E., Henson, R. N. A., Kiebel, S., Phillips, C., & Ashburner, J. (2002). Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: Applications. Neuroimage, 16, 484-512.
30. Goldrick, M. (2007). Connectionist principles in theories of speech production. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 515-530). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
31. Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186-209.
32. Gracco, V. L., Tremblay, P., & Pike, G. B. (2005). Imaging speech production using fMRI. Neuroimage, 26, 294-301.
33. Hammers, A., Allom, R., Koepp, M. J., Free, S. L., Myers, R., Lemieux, L., et al. (2003). Three-dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Human Brain Mapping, 19, 224-247.
34. Harley, T. A. (1993). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 291-309.
35. Hartsuiker, R. J. (2006). Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias? Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 856-891.
36. Heim, S., Friederici, A. D., Schiller, N. O., Rüschemeyer, S. A., & Amunts, K. (2008). The determiner congruency effect in language production investigated with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 928-940.
37. Hockey, A., Wiles, J., & de Zubicaray, G. (2005, November). Interactivity, conflict and cognitive control: Computational modelling of the language production system. Poster presented at the Dynamical Neuroscience Conference, Washington, DC.
38. Hocking, J., McMahon, K., & de Zubicaray, G. (2010). Semantic interference in object naming: An fMRI study of the postcue naming paradigm. Neuroimage, 50, 796-801.
39. Humphreys, G. W., Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Fias, W. (1995). Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 961-980.
40. Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
41. Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 249-256.
42. La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16, 400-410.
43. Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Ehsan, S. (2006). Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition, 13, 928-948.
44. Lee, C. H., Honig, R., & Lee, Y. (2002). Phonological recoding of mixed-case words in the priming task. Reading Psychology, 23, 199-216.
45. Lee, M. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2010, September). Lexical selection is by competition: A failure to replicate Mahon et al.ś (2007) Experiment 7. Poster presented at the Sixth International Workshop on Language Production, Edinburgh, Scotland.
46. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
47. Macey, P. M., Macey, K. E., Kumar, R., & Harper, R. M. (2004). A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series. Neuroimage, 22, 360-366.
48. Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Curda, C., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2011). Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 522-538.
49. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503-533.
50. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
51. McMahon, K., Pringle, A., Eastburn, M., & Maillet, D. (2004). Improving EPI imaging quality and sound levels with bandwidth selection. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, 1033 (abstract).
52. Menenti, L., & Burani, C. (2007). What causes the effect of age-of-acquisition in lexical processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 652-661.
53. Meschyan, G., & Hernandez, A. (2002). Age of acquisition and word frequency: Determinants of object-naming speed and accuracy. Memory and Cognition, 30, 262-269.
54. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228-252.
55. Morton, J. (1969). The i nteraction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
56. Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327-357.
57. Peeva, M. G., Guenther, F. H., Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castanon, A., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, B., et al. (2010). Distinct representations of phonemes, syllables, and supra-syllabic sequences in the speech production network. Neuroimage, 50, 626-638.
58. Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 404-423.
59. Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: A review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 62-88.
60. Riès, S., Janssen, N., Dufau, S., Alario, F. X., & Burle, B. (2011). General-purpose monitoring during speech production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1419-1436.
61. Righi, G., Blumstein, S., Mertus, J., & Worden, M. (2010). Neural systems underlying lexical competition: An eyetracking and fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 213-224.
62. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
63. Roelofs, A. (2005). From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
64. Roelofs, A. (2008). Attention to spoken word planning: Chronometric and neuroimaging evidence. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 389-405.
65. Roelofs, A., Piai, V., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: Comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1032-1038.
66. Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. Child Development, 26, 247-253.
67. Santesteban, M., Costa, A., Pontin, S., & Navarrete, E. (2006). The effect of word-frequency on lexical selection in speech production: Evidence from semantic homogeneous naming contexts. Cognitiva, 18, 75-84.
68. Schuhmann, T., Schiller, N. O., Goebel, R., & Sack, A. T. (2009). The temporal characteristics of functional activation in Brocaʼs area during overt picture naming. Cortex, 45, 1111-1116.
69. Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). Paying attention to reading: The neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 1329-1349.
70. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
71. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture-naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 896-918.
72. Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41-78.
73. Tremblay, P., & Gracco, V. L. (2009). On the selection of words and oral motor responses: Evidence of a response-independent fronto-parietal network. Cortex, 46, 15-28.
74. van Casteren, M., & Davis, M. H. (2006). Mix, a program for pseudorandomization. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 584-589.
75. Vaughan, J. T., Adriany, G., Garwood, M., Yacoub, E., Duong, T., DelaBarre, L., et al. (2002). Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high-field NMR. Magnetic esonance in Medicine, 47, 990-1000.
76. Zaitsev, M., Hennig, J., & Speck, O. (2003). Automated online EPI distortion correction for fMRI applications. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1042 (abstract).
77. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29.
78. Zheng, Z., Munhall, K. G., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2010). Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and monitoring oneś own voice during speech production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1770-1781.