Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 404-423

  Piai, Vitória ^a   Roelofs, Ardi ^a   Schriefers, Herbert ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Naming; Picture word interference; Reading; Task decision

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953194740     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM).
2. Balota D., Chumbley J.I. The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?. Journal of Memory and Language 1985, 24:89-106.
3. Besner D., Care S. A paradigm for exploring what the mind does while deciding what it should do. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 57:311-320.
4. Bonin P., Fayol M. Frequency effects in the written and spoken production of homophonic picture names. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2002, 14:289-313.
5. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
6. Dell'Acqua R., Job R., Peressotti F., Pascali A. The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:717-722.
7. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
8. Finkbeiner M., Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not a competitive process: A reply to La Heij et al. (2006). Cortex 2006, 42:1032-1035.
9. Finkbeiner M., Caramazza A. Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex 2006, 42:790-796.
10. Glaser W.R., Düngelhoff F.J. The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:640-654.
11. Glaser W.R., Glaser M.O. Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118:13-42.
12. Heathcote A., Popiel S.J., Mewhort D.J.K. Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 109:340-347.
13. Indefrey P., Levelt W.J. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 2004, 92:101-144.
14. Jaeger T.F. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:434-446.
15. Janssen N., Schirm W., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:249-256.
16. Jeannerod M. The cognitive neuroscience of action 1997, Wiley, Blackwell.
17. Jescheniak J.D., Levelt W.J. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:824-843.
18. La Heij W., Kaptein N.A., Kalff A.C., de Lange L. Reducing color-color interference by optimizing selection for action. Psychological Research 1995, 57:119-130.
19. Lamers M.J., Roelofs A. Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: Evidence from the Stroop task. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:1305-1314.
20. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:1-75.
21. Luce R.D. Response times 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Lupker S.J. The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:485-495.
23. Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Curda, C., & Jescheniak, J.D. (in press). Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
24. Mahon B.Z., Costa A., Peterson R., Vargas K.A., Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:503-535.
25. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive control processes and human multiple-task performance. Part 1. Basic Mechanisms. Psychological Review 1997, 104:3-65.
26. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance. Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 1997, 104:749-791.
27. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2001, 24:167-202.
28. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 1994, 52:189-234.
29. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. FMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 1999, 401:584-587.
30. Oldfield R., Wingfield A. Response latencies in naming objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 17:273-281.
31. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:220-244.
32. Pashler H., Johnston J.C. Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1989, 41:19-45.
33. Paulitzki J.R., Risko E.F., O'Malley S., Stolz J.A., Besner D. On the role of set when reading aloud: A dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18:135-144.
34. Raaijmakers J.G.W., Schrijnemakers J.M.C., Gremmen F. How to deal with ''The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy'': Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:416-426.
35. Ratcliff R. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:446-461.
36. Reynolds M., Besner D. Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1303-1323.
37. Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 1992, 42:107-142.
38. Roelofs A. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review 2003, 110:88-125.
39. Roelofs A. Context effects of pictures and words in naming objects, reading words, and generating simple phrases. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1764-1784.
40. Roelofs A. Attention and gaze control in picture naming, word reading, and word categorizing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:232-251.
41. Roelofs A. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1580-1598.
42. Roelofs A. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: Analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:303-323.
43. Rosinski R. Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development 1977, 48:643-647.
44. Schriefers H., Meyer A., Levelt W.J. Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29:86-102.
45. Sigman M., Dehaene S. Brain mechanisms of serial and parallel processing during dual-task performance. The Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:7585-7598.
46. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6:174-215.
47. Starreveld P.A., La Heij W. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:896-918.
48. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
49. Van Casteren M., Davis M.H. Mix, a program for pseudorandomization. Behavior Research Methods 2006, 38:584-589.
50. Yap M.J., Balota D.A. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:274-296.