Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 522-538

  Mädebach, Andreas ^a   Oppermann, Frank ^a   Hantsch, Ansgar ^b   Curda, Christian ^a   Jescheniak, Jörg D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

Author keywords

Lexical competition; Picture naming; Picture word interference; Semantic interference; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NOMENCLATURE; NOTE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAMES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952386807     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021970     Document Type: Note

References (49)

1. Abdel Rahman R., Aristei S. Now you see it... and now again: Semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:657-661. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.657.
2. Abdel Rahman R.A., Melinger A. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24:713-734. doi: 10.1080/01690960802597250.
3. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM) 1993, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Belke E., Meyer A.S., Damian M.F. Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 2005, 58:667-692. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000142.
5. Bialystok E., Craik F., Luk G. Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:859-873. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859.
6. Bloem I., van den Boogaard S., La Heij W. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:307-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.001.
7. Costa A., Alario F.X., Caramazza A. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:125-131.
8. Costa A., Hernández M., Sebastián-Gallés N. Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition 2008, 106:59-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.013.
9. Costa A., Mahon B., Savova V., Caramazza A. Level of categorisation effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes 2003, 18:205-234. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000524.
10. Damian M.F., Vigliocco G., Levelt W.J.M. Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition 2001, 81:B77-B86. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4.
11. Dhooge E., Hartsuiker R.J. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:878-891. doi: 10.1037/a0019128.
12. Finkbeiner M., Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not a competitive process: A reply to La Heij et al. (2006). Cortex 2006, 42:1032-1035. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70210-7.
13. Finkbeiner M., Caramazza A. Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex 2006, 42:790-796. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70419-2.
14. Finkbeiner M., Caramazza A. Modulating the masked congruence priming effect with the hands and the mouth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:894-918. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.894.
15. Glaser W.R., Düngelhoff F.J. The time course of picture word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:640-654. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640.
16. Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D., & Mädebach, A. (2010). Naming and categorizing objects: Task instruction modulates the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Hantsch A., Jescheniak J.D., Schriefers H. Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:984-1000.
18. Hantsch A., Jescheniak J.D., Schriefers H. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: Implications for theories of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1443-1453. doi: 10.1037/a0017020.
19. Howard D., Nickels L., Coltheart M., Cole-Virtue J. Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition 2006, 100:464-482. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006.
20. Indefrey P., Levelt W.J.M. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 2004, 92:101-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001.
21. Janssen N., Schirm W., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:249-256. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249.
22. Jescheniak J.D., Levelt W.J.M. Word-frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:824-843. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824.
23. Jescheniak J.D., Schriefers H., Hantsch A. Utterance format affects phonological priming in the picture-word task: Implications for models of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:441-454. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.441.
24. Kuipers J.R., La Heij W., Costa A. A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency. Language and Cognitive Processes 2006, 21:892-919. doi: 10.1080/016909600824211.
25. La Heij W. Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition 1988, 16:400-410.
26. La Heij W., Dirkx J., Kramer P. Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology 1990, 81:511-525.
27. La Heij W., Kuipers J.R., Starreveld P.A. In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006). Cortex 2006, 42:1028-1031. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70209-0.
28. Lee, M. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2010, September). Lexical selection is by competition: A failure to replicate Mahon et al.'s (2007) Experiment 7. Poster presented at the Sixth International Workshop on Language Production, Edinburgh, Scotland.
29. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:1-38. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776.
30. Lupker S.J. The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:485-495.
31. Mahon B.Z., Costa A., Peterson R., Vargas K.A., Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:503-535. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503.
32. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1423-1442. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423.
33. Miozzo M., Caramazza A. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:228-252. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228.
34. Navarrete E., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychologica 2010, 134:279-289. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009.
35. Oldfield R.C., Wingfield A. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 17:273-281. doi: 10.1080/17470216508416445.
36. Oppenheim G.M., Dell G.S., Schwartz M.F. The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition 2010, 114:227-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007.
37. Paulitzki J.R., Risko E.F., O'Malley S., Stolz J.A., Besner D. On the role of set when reading aloud: A dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal 2009, 18:135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.11.007.
38. Piai, V. M., Roelofs, A., & Schriefers, H. (2010). Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Role of task decisions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
39. Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 1992, 42:107-142. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F.
40. Roelofs A. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: Analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:303-323. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.303.
41. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207.
42. Rosinski R. Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development 1977, 48:643-647. doi: 10.2307/1128667.
43. Schriefers H., Meyer A., Levelt W.J.M. Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29:86-102. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N.
44. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures-norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6:174-215. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174.
45. Spalek K. Gibt es einen Antwortbuffer bei der Wortproduktion? [Is a response buffer involved in word production?] [Abstract]. Beiträge zur 52. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen 2010, 105. Pabst Science, Lengerich, Germany. C. Frings, A. Mecklinger, D. Wentura, H. Zimmer (Eds.).
46. Starreveld P.A., La Heij W. Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:686-698. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.686.
47. Starreveld P.A., La Heij W. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:896-918. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.896.
48. Vigliocco G., Vinson D.P., Lewis W., Garrett M.F. Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology 2004, 48:422-488. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001.
49. Vitkovitch M., Tyrrell L. The effects of distractor words on naming pictures at the subordinate level. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 1999, 52:905-926. doi: 10.1080/027249899390864.