Frequency Drives Lexical Access in Reading but Not in Speaking: The Frequency-Lag Hypothesis

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 140, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 186-209

  Gollan, Tamar H ^a   Slattery, Timothy J ^b   Goldenberg, Diane ^b   Van Assche, Eva ^c   Duyck, Wouter ^c   Rayner, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bilingual; Frequency effect; Production; Reading; Semantic constraint

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; READING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; MULTILINGUALISM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VOCABULARY;

EID: 79955736013     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022256     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Almeida J., Knobel M., Finkbeiner M., Caramazza A. The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: When recognizing is not enough. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:1177-1182.
2. Andrews S. The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4:439-461.
3. Awad M., Warren J.E., Scott S.K., Turkheimer F.E., Wise R.J. A common system for the comprehension and production of narrative speech. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:11455-11464. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5257-06.2007.
4. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Glikers L. The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM] 1995, Philadelphia Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
5. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Watson J.M. Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:495-523. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.10.004.
6. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Green D.W., Gollan T.H. Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2009, 10:89-129.
7. Bialystok E., Luk G., Peets K.F., Yang S. Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2010, 13:525-531.
8. Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1997, 14:177-208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664.
9. Caramazza A., Costa A., Miozzo M., Bi Y.C. The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition 2001, 27:1430-1450. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1430.
10. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 1993, 25:257-271.
11. Coltheart M. Assumptions and methods in cognitive neuropsychology. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind 2001, 3-21. Psychology Press, Ann Arbor, MI. B. Rapp (Ed.).
12. Costa A. Lexical access in bilingual production. Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches 2005, 308-325. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. J.F. Kroll, A.M.B. de Groot (Eds.).
13. Costa A., Caramazza A. Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish-English and English-Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1999, 2:231-244. doi: 10.1017/S1366728999000334.
14. Costa A., Caramazza A., Sebastián-Gallés N. The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1283-1296. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1283.
15. Cutting J.C., Ferreira V.S. Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:318-344. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.318.
16. Davies M. Time Magazine corpus: 100 million words, 1920s-2000s 2007, Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://corpus.byu.edu/time.
17. Dell G.S. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 1990, 5:313-349. doi: 10.1080/01690969008407066.
18. Dell G.S., Gordon J.K. Neighbors in the lexicon friends or foes?. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities 2003, 9-38. Mouten de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. N.O. Schiller, A.S. Meyer (Eds.).
19. Dijkstra T., van Heuven W.J.B. The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2002, 5:175-197.
20. Duffy S.A., Morris R.K., Rayner K. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 1988, 27:429-446. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90066-6.
21. Duyck W., Van Assche E., Drieghe D., Hartsuiker R.J. Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:663-679. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.663.
22. Duyck W., Vanderelst D., Desmet T., Hartsuiker R.J. The frequency-effect in second-language visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:850-855. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.850.
23. Ehrlich S.F., Rayner K. Contextual effects on word recognition and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20:641-655. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90220-6.
24. Fay D., Cutler A. Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 1977, 8:505-520.
25. Ferreira F. Production-comprehension asymmetries. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004, 27:196. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04280050.
26. Fischler I., Bloom P.A. Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Language Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:1-20. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90534-6.
27. Forster K.I. Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1981, 33A:465-495.
28. Forster K.I., Chambers S.M. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1973, 12:627-635. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8.
29. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984, 10:680-698. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680.
30. Frost R. Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 123:71-99. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71.
31. Garrett M. Now you see it, now you don't: Frequency effects in language production. Language, brain and cognitive development 2001, 227-240. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. E. Doupoux (Ed.).
32. Gernsbacher M.A., Faust M. The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991, 17:245-262. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.245.
33. Gollan T.H., Montoya R.I., Cera C., Sandoval T.C. More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:787-814. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001.
34. Gollan T.H., Montoya R.I., Fennema-Notestine C., Morris S.K. Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:1220-1234.
35. Gollan T.H., Montoya R.I., Werner G. Semantic and letter fluency in Spanish-English bilinguals. Neuropsychology 2002, 16:562-576. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.16.4.562.
36. Gollan T.H., Silverberg N.B. Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2001, 4:63-83. doi: 10.1017/S136672890100013X.
37. Graves W.W., Grabowski T.J., Mehta S., Gordon J.K. A neural signature of phonological access: Distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19:617-631. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.617.
38. Griffin Z.M., Bock K. Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between lexical processing levels in spoken word production. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:313-338. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2547.
39. Hand C.J., Miellet S., O'Donnell P.J., Sereno S.C. The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: It depends where you're coming from. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:1294-1313. doi: 10.1037/a0020363.
40. Hermans D., Bongaerts T., de Bot K., Schreuder R. Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1998, 1:213-229. doi: 10.1017/S1366728998000364.
41. Hillis A. The organization of the lexical system. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind 2001, 185-210. Psychology Press, Ann Arbor, MI. B. Rapp (Ed.).
42. Howes D.H., Solomon R.L. Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1951, 41:401-410. doi: 10.1037/h0056020.
43. Ivanova I., Costa A. Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production?. Acta Psychologica 2008, 127:277-288. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003.
44. Jescheniak J.D., Levelt W.J.M. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:824-843. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824.
45. Jurafsky D. Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. Probability theory in linguistics 2003, 39-96. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R. Bod, J. Hay, S. Jannedy (Eds.).
46. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 1980, 87:329-354. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329.
47. Kittredge A.K., Dell G.S., Verkuilen J., Schwartz M.F. Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:463-492. doi: 10.1080/02643290701674851.
48. Knobel M., Finkbeiner M., Caramazza A. The many places of frequency: Evidence for a novel locus of the lexical frequency effect in word production. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:256-286. doi: 10.1080/02643290701502425.
49. Kroll J.F., Bobb S.C., Misra M., Guo T. Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128:416-430. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.001.
50. Kroll J.F., Potter M.C. Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1984, 23:39-66. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90499-7.
51. Kucera H., Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present-day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence, RI.
52. La Heij W. Selection processes in monolingual and bilingual lexical access. Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches 2005, 289-307. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. J.F. Kroll, A.M.B. de Groot (Eds.).
53. Lehtonen M., Laine M. How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2003, 6:213-225. doi: 10.1017/S1366728903001147.
54. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:1-38. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776.
56. Lezak M.D., Howieson D.B., Loring D.W. Neuropsychological Assessment 2004, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 4th ed.
57. Libben M.R., Titone D.A. Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:381-390. doi: 10.1037/a0014875.
58. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P., Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 1967, 74:431-461. doi: 10.1037/h0020279.
59. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985, 21:1-36. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6.
60. Lotto A.J., Hickok G.S., Holt L.L. Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.008.
61. Lupker S.J. The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:485-495.
62. MacKay I., Flege J. Effects of the age of second-language (L2) learning on the duration of L1 and L2 sentences: The role of suppression. Applied Psycholinguistics 2004, 25:373-396. doi: 10.1017/S0142716404001171.
63. Mägiste E. The competing language systems of the multilingual: A developmental study of decoding and encoding processes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:79-89. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90584-X.
64. Mahon B.Z., Costa A., Peterson R., Vargas K.A., Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:503-535. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503.
65. Mehl M.R., Vazire S., Ramirez-Esparza N., Slatcher R.B., Pennebaker J.W. Are women really more talkative than men?. Science 2007, July 6, 317:82. doi: 10.1126/science.1139940.
66. Murray W.S. Sentence processing: Issues and measures. Reading as a perceptual process 2000, 649-664. Elsevier, Oxford, England, doi: 10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50030-9. A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, J. Pynte (Eds.).
67. Murray W.S., Forster K.I. Serial mechanisms in lexical access: The rank hypothesis. Psychological Review 2004, 111:721-756. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.721.
68. Navarrete E., Basagni B., Alario F.X., Costa A. Does word frequency affect lexical selection in speech production?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1681-1690. doi: 10.1080/17470210600750558.
69. Neely J.H. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theory. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition 1991, 264-336. Erlbaum, Hillsadale, NJ. D. Besner, G.W. Humphreys (Eds.).
70. Nicoladis E., Palmer A., Marentette P. The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. Developmental Science 2007, 10:237-254. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00582.x.
71. Oldfield R.C., Wingfield A. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 17:273-281. doi: 10.1080/17470216508416445.
72. Pearson B.Z., Fernandez S.C., Lewedeg V., Kimbrough D. The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics 1997, 18:41-58. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400009863.
73. Pelli D.G., Tillman K.A., Freeman J., Su M., Berger T.D., Majaj N.J. Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision 2007, 20(7):1-36.
74. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral Brain Sciences 2004, 27:169-190. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056.
75. Portocarrero J.S., Burright R.G., Donovick P.J. Vocabulary and verbal fluency of bilingual and monolingual college students. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2007, 22:415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.015.
76. Raney G.E., Rayner K. Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1995, 49:151-173. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.49.2.151.
77. Ransdell S.E., Fischler I. Memory in a monolingual mode: When are bilinguals at a disadvantage?. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26:392-405. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90098-2.
78. Rapp B. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind 2001, Psychology Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
79. Ratcliff R. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:446-461. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446.
80. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
81. Rayner K. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1457-1506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461.
82. Rayner K., Ashby J., Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:720-732. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.720.
83. Rayner K., Duffy S.A. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:191-201.
84. Rayner K., Kambe G., Duffy S.A. The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 2000, 53:1061-1080. doi: 10.1080/02724980050156290.
85. Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (in press). Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
86. Rayner K., Well A.D. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:504-509.
87. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105:125-157. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125.
88. Roelofs A. Modeling the relation between the production and recognition of spoken word forms. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities 2003, 115-158. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. N.O. Schiller, A.S. Meyer (Eds.).
89. Rosselli M., Ardila A., Araujo K., Weekes V.A., Caracciolo V., Padilla M., Ostrosky-Solis F. Verbal fluency and repetition skills in healthy older Spanish-English bilinguals. Applied Neuropsychology 2000, 7:17-24. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0701_3.
90. Rubenstein H., Garfield L., Millikan J.A. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1970, 9:487-494. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3.
91. Sandoval T.C., Gollan T.H., Ferreira V.S., Salmon D.P. What causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency: The dual-task analogy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2010, 13:231-252. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990514.
92. Scarborough D.L., Cortese C., Scarborough H.S. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3:1-17. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1.
93. Schiller N.O., Meyer A.S. Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities 2003, Mouten de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
94. Schilling H.E.H., Rayner K., Chumbley J.I. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:1270-1281.
95. Schriefers H., Meyer A.S., Levelt W.J.M. Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29:86-102. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N.
96. Schwartz A.I., Kroll J.F. Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:197-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.004.
97. Sebastián-Gallés N., Kroll J.F. Phonology in bilingual language processing: Acquisition, perception, and production. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities 2003, 279-317. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. N. Schiller, A. Meyer (Eds.).
98. Shelton J.R., Caramazza A. The organization of semantic memory. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind 2001, 423-444. Psychology Press, Ann Arbor, MI. B. Rapp (Ed.).
99. Shipley W.C. Institute of Living Scale 1946, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA.
100. Slattery T.J. Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1969-1975. doi: 10.1037/a0016894.
101. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:77-85.
102. Staub A., White S.J., Drieghe D., Hollway E.C., Rayner K. Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:1280-1293. doi: 10.1037/a0016896.
103. Swinney D. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:645-659. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90355-4.
104. Taylor S.E. Eye movements in reading: Facts and fallacies. American Educational Research Journal 1965, 2:187-202.
105. Treiman R., Clifton C., Meyer A.S., Wurm L.H. Language comprehension and production. Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology 2003, 527-548. Wiley, New York, NY. I.B. Weiner, A.F. Healy, R.W. Proctor, J.A. Schinka (Eds.).
106. Tulving E., Gold C. Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1963, 66:319-327. doi: 10.1037/h0048802.
107. Van Assche E., Duyck W., Hartsuiker R., Diependaele K. Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in sentence context. Psychological Science 2009, 20:923-927. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02389.x.
108. Van Assche E., Drieghe D., Duyck W., Welvaert M., Hartsuiker R.J. The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 64:88-107.
109. van Hell J.G., de Groot A.M.B. Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128:431-451. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.010.
110. Van Petten C., Kutas M. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition 1990, 18:380-393.
111. Venezia J.H., Hickok G. Mirror neurons, the motor system, and language: From the motor theory to embodied cognition and beyond. Language and Linguistics Compass 2009, 3:1403-1416. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00169.x.
112. Vincent S.B. The function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavioral Monographs 1912, 1(No. 5):1-81.
113. Yap M.J., Balota D.A. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:274-296. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.274.
114. Zwitserlood P. The internal structure of words: Consequences for listening and speaking. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities 2003, 79-114. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. N.O. Schiller, A.S. Meyer (Eds.).