Instantaneous stiffness effects on impact forces in human-friendly robots

IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2998-3003

  Shin, Dongjun ^a   Quek, Zhan Fan ^b   Phan, Samson ^b   Cutkosky, Mark ^b   Khatib, Oussama ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL PNEUMATIC MUSCLES; CONTROL BANDWIDTH; CONTROL PERFORMANCE; CONTROLLER GAIN; DESIGN AND CONTROL; DIFFERENT EFFECTS; EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON; FREQUENCY DOMAINS; HUMAN-FRIENDLY; IMPACT FORCE; IMPACT VELOCITIES; JOINT STIFFNESS; PNEUMATIC MUSCLE; POTENTIAL EFFECTS; ROBOT SAFETY; STANFORD;

MACHINE DESIGN; MUSCLE; PNEUMATIC CONTROL; PNEUMATIC EQUIPMENT; ROBOTICS; STIFFNESS;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

EID: 84455169984     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2011.6048690     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. H. Asada and T. Kanade. Design of direct drive mechanical arms. ASME Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design, 105:312-316, July 1983. (Pubitemid 13571184)
2. A. Bicchi and G. Tonietti. Fast and soft-arm tactics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 11(2):22-33, 2004.
3. J. Choi, S. Park, W. Lee, and S. Kang. Design of a robot joint with variable stiffness. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1760-1765, May 2008.
4. C. P. Chou and B. Hannaford. Measurement and modeling of mckibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 12(1):90-102, 1996. (Pubitemid 126780450)
5. V. Gowdy, R. DeWeese, M. Beebe, B. Wade, J. Duncan, R. Kelly, and J.L. Blaker. A lumbar spine modification to the hybrid iii atd for aircraft seat tests. SAE Technical paper series, 1999.
6. S. Haddadin, A. Albu-Schaffer, and G. Hirzinger. Safe Physical Human-Robot Interaction:Measurements, Analysis and New Insights. Hiroshima, Japan.
7. G. Hirzinger, N. Sporer, A. Albu-Schaffer, M. Hahnle, and A. Pascucci. Dlr's torque-controlled light weight robot iii - are we reaching the technological limits now? In Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pages 1710-1716, 2002.
8. ISO10218. Robots for industrial environments - safety requirements - part 1: Robot. 2011.
9. K. Salisbury, W. Townsend, B. Ebrman, and D. DiPietro. Preliminary design of a whole-arm manipulation system (WAMS). IEEE Comput. Soc. Press.
10. D. Shin, I. Sardellitti, and O. Khatib. A hybrid actuation approach for human-friendly robot design. Proc. of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1747-1752, 2008.
11. D. Shin, I. Sardellitti, Y. Park, O. Khatib, and M. Cutkosky. Design and control of a bio-inspired human-friendly robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 29(5):571-584, 2010.
12. D. Shin, F. Seitz, O. Khatib, and M. Cutkosky. Analysis of torque capacities in hybrid actuation for human-friendly robot design. Proc. of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 799-804, 2010.
13. M Van Damme, P Beyl, B Vanderborght, R Van Ham, I Vanderniepen, A Matthys, P Cherelle, and D. Lefeber. The role of compliance in robot safety. Dependable Robots in Human Environments, 2010.
14. D. Vischer and O. Khatib. Design and development of highperformance torque-controlled joints. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 11(4):537-544, 1995.
15. M. Wassink and S. Stramigioli. Towards a novel safety norm for domestic robotics. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007. IROS 2007. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pages 3354-3359, 2007.
16. M. Zinn. A New Actuation Approach for Human-Friendly Robotic Manipulation. Thesis (phd).
17. M. Zinn, B. Roth, O. Khatib, and J. K. Salisbury. New actuation approach for human-friendly robot design. International Journal of Robotics Research, 23(1):379-398, 2004.