Composite vertical bite reconstructions in eroded dentitions after 5·5years: A case series

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 73-79

  Attin, T ^a   Filli, T ^a   Imfeld, C ^a   Schmidlin, P R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Case series; Clinical; Composite resin; Posterior; Tooth wear

Indexed keywords

RESIN; TETRIC;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; STANDARD; TOOTH DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOOTH EROSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 83555164980     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02240.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Johansson A, Johansson AK, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Rehabilitation of the worn dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:548-566.
2. Jaeggi T, Grüninger A, Lussi A. Restorative therapy of erosion. In: Lussi A, ed. Dental erosion. Basel: Karger, 2006:200-214.
3. Bonilla ED, Luna O. Oral rehabilitation of a bulimic patient: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:469-475.
4. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent. 1997;25:459-473.
5. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:45-64.
6. Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin N Am. 2002;46:303-339.
7. Vailati F, Belser UC. Full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation of a severely eroded dentition: the three-step technique. Part 3. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008;3:236-257.
8. Vailati F, Belser UC. Full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation of a severely eroded dentition: the three-step technique. Part 2. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008;3:128-146.
9. Vailati F, Belser UC. Full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation of a severely eroded dentition: the three-step technique. Part 1. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008;3:30-44.
10. Smales RJ, Berekally TL. Long-term survival of direct and indirect restorations placed for the treatment of advanced tooth wear. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2007;15:2-6.
11. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23:2-8.
12. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:469-475.
13. Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Momoi Y. 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2007;32:3-10.
14. Bogacki RE, Hunt RJ, del Aguila M, Smith WR. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Oper Dent. 2002;27:488-492.
15. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J Dent. 2006;34:427-435.
16. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18:256-265.
17. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Direct cuspal-coverage posterior resin composite restorations: a case report. Oper Dent. 2006;31:143-150.
18. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent. 2003;31:395-405.
19. Bartlett D, Sundaram G. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:613-617.
20. Schmidlin PR, Filli T, Imfeld C, Tepper S, Attin T. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series. Oper Dent. 2009;34:102-108.
21. Wiegand A, Egert S, Attin T. Toothbrushing before or after an acidic challenge to minimize tooth wear? An in situ/ex vivo study. Am J Dent. 2008;21:13-16.
22. Attin T, Hornecker E. Tooth brushing and oral health: how frequently and when should tooth brushing be performed? Oral Health Prev Dent. 2005;3:135-140.
23. Attin T, Knofel S, Buchalla W, Tutuncu R. In situ evaluation of different remineralization periods to decrease brushing abrasion of demineralized enamel. Caries Res. 2001;35:216-222.
24. Wiegand A, Kuhn M, Sener B, Roos M, Attin T. Abrasion of eroded dentin caused by toothpaste slurries of different abrasivity and toothbrushes of different filament diameter. J Dent. 2009;37:480-484.
25. Attin T, Weiss K, Becker K, Buchalla W, Wiegand A. Impact of modified acidic soft drinks on enamel erosion. Oral Dis. 2005;11:7-12.
26. Gavish A, Winocur E, Ventura YS, Halachmi M, Gazit E. Effect of stabilization splint therapy on pain during chewing in patients suffering from myofascial pain. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;67:1181-1186.
27. Kavoura V, Kourtis SG, Zoidis P, Andritsakis DP, Doukoudakis A. Full-mouth rehabilitation of a patient with bulimia nervosa. A case report. Quintessence Int. 2005;36:501-510.
28. Van Roekel NB. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, tooth erosion, and prosthodontic rehabilitation: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2003;12:255-259.
29. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:9-20.
30. Ferracane JL. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear bsimulating devices? Dent Mater. 2006;22:689-692.
31. Lutz F, Krejci I. Amalgam substitutes: a critical analysis. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12:146-159.
32. Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MR. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. Am J Dent. 2001;14:304-308.
33. Zantner C, Kielbassa AM, Martus P, Kunzelmann KH. Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers. Dent Mater. 2004;20:277-285.
34. Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1302-1314.
35. Palaniappan A, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance. Clin Oral Invest. 2011: doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0500-0 [Epub ahead of print].
36. Ilie N, Hickel R. Macro-, micro- and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites. Dent Mater. 2009;25:810-819.
37. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Invest. 2009;13:427-438.
38. Attin T, Buchalla W, Trett A, Hellwig E. Toothbrushing abrasion of polyacid-modified composites in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:148-150.
39. Yu H, Wegehaupt FJ, Wiegand A, Roos M, Attin T, Buchalla W. Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. J Dent. 2009;37:913-922.
40. Abdalla AI, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical performance of a self-etch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching. J Dent. 2007;35:558-563.
41. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21:864-881.
42. Kelly PG, Smales CM. Long-term cost-effectiveness of single indirect restorations in selected dental practices. Br Dent J. 2004;196:639-643.