Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 76-84

  Karunasena, Kanishka ^a   Deng, Hepu ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

E government; Public value; Sri lanka; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 83055186581     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Afonso A., Schuknecht L., Tanzi V. Public sector efficiency evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets Retrieved December 15, 2010, from. http://www.repository.utl.pt/bitstream/10400.5/2131/1/ecbwp581.pdf.
2. Alford J., O'Flynn J. Public value: A stocktake of a concept. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management 2008, Retrieved from. https://researchers.anu.edu.au/publications/43988.
3. Alford J., O'Flynn J. Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration 2009, 32(3-4):171-191.
4. Al-Sobhi F., Weerakkody V., Kamal M.M. An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: Case of Saudi Arabia. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2010, 4(1):14-36.
5. Badri M.A., Alshare K. Path analytic model and measurement of the business value of e-government: An international perspective. International Journal of Information Management 2008, 28(6):524-535.
6. Barnes S.J., Vidgen R. An evaluation of cyber-bookshops: The WebQual method. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2001, 6(1):11-30.
7. Beynon-Davies P. Constructing electronic government: The case of the UK Inland Revenue. International Journal of Information Management 2005, 25(1):3-20.
8. Bhattacherjee A., Premkumar G. Understanding changes in belief and attitudes towards information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly 2004, 28(2):229-254.
9. Bonina C.M., Cordella A. The new public management, e-government and the notion of public value: Lessons from Mexico. Proceedings of the Annual Workshop of the AIS Special Interest Group for ICT in Global Development 2008 2008, Retrieved from. http://aisel.aisnet.org/globdev2008/11/.
10. Bozeman B. Public value and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism 2007, Georgetown University Press, Washington.
11. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modelling with AMOS-Basic concepts, applications, and programming 2010, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
12. Castelnovo W., Simonetta M. The public value evaluation of e-government policies. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 2007, 11(2):61-72.
13. Chang C.C., Chen Y.F., Liao K.H. A triple-diamond framework for the assessment of e-government in delivery service quality. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Trends in Information and Service Science 2009, 2009. 10.1109/NISS.2009.179.
14. Chau P.Y.K. Reexamining a model for evaluating information centre success using a structural equation modelling approach. Decision Sciences 1997, 28(2):309-334.
15. Demchak C.C., Friis C. Webbing governance: National differences in constructing the public face. Handbook of public information systems 2000, Marcel Dekker, New York. G.D. Garson (Ed.).
16. Deng H. Towards objective benchmarking of e-government: An inter-country analysis. International Journal of Transformational Government: People, Process and Policy 2008, 2(3):162-176.
17. Dwivedi Y.K., Papazafeiropoulou A., Gharavi H., Khoumbati K. Examining the socio-economic determinants of adoption of the 'Government Gateway' initiative in the UK. Electronic Government, an International Journal 2006, 3(4):404-419.
18. Measurement framework final version: e-Government economics project European Commission, Retrieved June 20, 2009, from. http://www.epractice.eu/files/media/media1299.pdf.
19. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equations with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18(1):39-50.
20. Gauld R., Goldfinch S., Horsburgh S. Do they want it? Do they use it? The demand-side of e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(2):177-186.
21. Golubeva A.A. Evaluation of regional government portal on the basis of public value concept: Case study from Russian Federation. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance 07 2007, 10.1145/1328057.1328139.
22. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.A.J., Anderson R.E. Multivariate data analysis 2010, Pearson Prentice Hall Ltd., London.
23. Hanna N. From envisioning to designing e-development: The experience of Sri Lanka 2007, The World Bank, Washington.
24. Hanna N. Transforming government and empowering communities: Sri Lankan experience with e-development 2008, The World Bank, Washington.
25. Heeks R. Benchmarking e-government: Improving the national and international measurement evaluation and comparison of e-government. Evaluating information systems: Public and private sector 2008, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. Z. Irani, P. Love (Eds.).
26. IANIS Guide to regional good practice e-government 2007, Innovative Actions Network for the Information Society Secretariat, Brussels.
27. ITU ICTs for e-environmental guidelines for developing countries with a focus on climate change 2008, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.
28. Jaeger P.T., Thompson K.M. E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly 2003, 20(4):389-394.
29. Jorgensen T.B., Bozeman B. Public values an inventory. Administration & Society 2007, 39(3):354-381.
30. Karunasena K., Deng H. A conceptual framework for evaluating the public value of e-government. Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference of Information Systems 2009, Retrieved from. http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2010/13/.
31. Karunasena K., Deng H. Exploring the public value of e-government: An empirical study from Sri Lanka. Proceedings of the 23rd Bled e-Conference e-Trust: Implication for the individuals, enterprises and society 2010, Retrieved from. http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2010/21/.
32. Kearns I. Public value and e-government Retrieved September 8, 2008, from. http://www.ippr.org/uploadedFiles/projects/Kearns_PublicValueandeGovenrment_ippr.pdf.
33. Kelly G., Mulgan G., Muers S. Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reform Retrieved October 15, 2008, from. http://www.allamreform.hu/letoltheto/kozfeladatok/kulfoldi/public_value2.pdf.
34. Kernaghan K. Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centrepiece. Public Administration Review 2003, 63(6):711-719.
35. Klischewski R., Scholl H.J. Information quality as a common ground for key players in e-government integration and interoperability. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006 2006, doi:10.1.1.98.8703.
36. Lau E. E-government and the drive for growth and equity. Proceedings of the Conference from E-Gov to I-Gov 2005, Retrieved from. http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/lau-wp.pdf.
37. Lee J. 10year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(3):220-230.
38. Meynhardt T. Public value inside: What is public value creation?. International Journal of Public Administration 2009, 32(3-4):192-219.
39. Millard J., Warren R., Leitner C., Shahin J. Towards the e-government vision for the EU in 2010: Research policy challenges Retrieved July 28, 2010, from. http://fiste.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/documents/eGovresearchpolicychallenges-DRAFTFINALWEBVERSION.pdf.
40. Molla A., Cooper V.A., Pittayachawan S. IT and eco-sustainability: Developing and validating a green IT readiness model. Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Information Systems 2009, Retrieved from. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/141/.
41. Moore M.H. Creating public value: Strategic management in government 1995, Harvard University Press, London.
42. O'Flynn J. From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration 2007, 66(3):353-366.
43. Papadomichelaki X., Mentzas G. A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. EGOV 2009 2009, 163-175. Springer-Verlag, Berline. M.A. Wimmer, H.J. Scholl, M. Janssen, R. Traunmuller (Eds.).
44. Samaratunge R., Wijewardena N. The changing nature of public values in developing countries. International Journal of Public Administration 2009, 32(3):313-327.
45. Schumacher R.E., Lomax R.G. A beginner's guide to structural equation modelling 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
46. Straub D., Boudreau M., Gefan D. Validation guidelines for IS positivistic research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2004, 13(24):380-427.
47. Torres T., Pina V., Royo S. E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms?. Online Information Review 2005, 29(5):531-553.
48. Try D., Radnor Z. Developing an understanding of result-based management through public value theory. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2007, 20(7):655-673.
49. World public sector report 2003: e-Government at cross road: Global e-government survey United Nations, Retrieved July 10, 2009, from. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan012733.pdf.
50. UN e-government survey 2008: From e-government to connected governance United Nations, Retrieved February 20, 2010, from. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan028607.pdf.
51. Wangpipatwong S., Chutimaskul W., Papasratorn B. Factors influencing the adoption of Thai e-government websites: Information quality and system quality approach. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eBusiness 2005, Retrieved from. http://www.ijcim.th.org/v13nSP3/pdf/p14-1-7-Factors%20Influencing.pdf.
52. Weerakkody V., Dwivedi Y., Karunananda A. Implementing e-government in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK. Information Technology for Development 2009, 15(3):171-192.
53. Wong W., Welch E. Does e-government promote accountability?. An International Journal of Policy Administration, and Institutions 2004, 17(2):275-297.
54. Yoo B., Donthu N. Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of internet shopping sites (SITEQUAL). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 2001, 2(1):31-47.
55. Yu C. Building a value centric e-government service framework based on a business model perspective. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2008, 5184:160-171.