Gendered address terms in reproach sequences in classroom interaction

Linguistics and Education

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 330-347

  Tainio, Liisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Address terms; Classroom; Conversation analysis; Gender; Reproach

Indexed keywords

EID: 82755195001     PISSN: 08985898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2010.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Ahearn L.M. Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 2001, 30:109-137.
2. Anttila, T. (2008). Lukiolaisten käsityksiä huumorista ja kokemuksia opettajista huumrin käyttäjinä [Upper secondary school students' conceptions of humor and experiences in teachers as users of humor]. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
3. Arminen I. Institutional interaction. Studies of talk at work 2005, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Burlington.
4. Arthur M., Gordon C., Butterfield N. Classroom management: Creating positive learning environments 2003, Thomson, Melbourne.
5. Auer P. From code-switching via language mixing to fused lects: Towards a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. The International Journal of Bilingualism 1999, 3(4):309-332.
6. Baxter J. Competing discourses in the classroom: A post-structuralist discourse analysis of girls' and boys' speech in public contexts. Discourse & Society 2002, 13(6):827-842.
7. Bergvall V.L., Remlinger K.A. Reptroduction, resistance and gender in educational discourse: The role of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 1996, 7(4):453-479.
8. Bourne J., Jewitt C. Orchestrating debate: A multimodal analysis of classroom interaction. Reading 2003, 37(2):64-72.
9. Brouwers A., Tomic W. A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education 2000, 16:239-253.
10. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness. Some universals in language usage 1987, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Butler J. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity 1990, Routledge, London.
12. Butler J. Excitable speech: A politics of performative 1997, Routledge, London.
13. Cameron D. The myth of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages? 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Cangelosi J. Classroom management: Strategies gaining and maintaining students' cooperation 2004, Wiley, Hoboken (NJ).
15. Cekaite A., Aronsson K. Repetition and joking in children's second language conversations: Playful recyclings in an immersion classroom. Discourse Studies 2004, 6:373-392.
16. Cipani E. Classroom management for all teachers: Plans for evidence-based practice 2008, Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
17. Clift R. Irony in conversation. Language in Society 1999, 28:523-553.
18. Couper-Kuhlen E. The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. Prosody in conversation 1996, 366-405. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. E. Couper-Kuhlen, M. Selting (Eds.).
19. Creese A., Leonard D., Daniels H., Hey V. Pedagogic discourses, learning and gender identification. Language and Education 2004, 18(3):191-206.
20. Dalton-Puffer C., Nikula T. Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics 2006, 27(2):241-267.
21. Dersley, I. (1998). Complaining and arguing in everyday conversation. PhD thesis, Department of Sociology, University of York, UK.
22. Dersley I., Wootton A. Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2000, 33(4):375-406.
23. Drew P. Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 1987, 25:219-253.
24. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. Drew, J. Heritage (Eds.).
25. Eckert P., McConnell-Ginet S. Language and gender 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Einarsson C., Granström K. Gender biased interaction in the classroom: The influence of gender and age in the relationship between teacher and pupil. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2002, 46(2):117-127.
27. Evaldsson A.-C. Staging insults and mobilizing categorizations in peergroup interaction. Discourse & Society 2005, 16:763-786.
28. Fairclough N. Language and power 1989, Longman, London.
29. Finnish National Curriculum. (2004). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet. Opetushallitus. Helsinki: Painatuskeskus.
30. Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology 1967, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
31. Goffman Erving Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior 1967, Anchor Books, New York.
32. Goffman E. The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society 1977, 4(3):301-331.
33. Goodwin C. Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers 1981, Academic Press, New York.
34. Goodwin C. Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. Roots of human sociality 2006, 97-125. Berg, London. N. Enfield, S.C. levinson (Eds.).
35. Goodwin M.H., Goodwin C. Emotion within situated activity. Linguistic anthropology: A reader 2001, 239-257. Blackwell, Oxford. A. Duranti (Ed.).
36. Gordon, T. (2004). " Sata pientä sääntöä..." - sukupuoli koulun arjessa [" Hundreds of tiny rules..." - gender in everyday life of school]. In E. Vitikka (Ed.), Koulu - sukupuoli - oppimistulokset [School - gender - learning results] (pp. 68-83). Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
37. Gordon T., Holland J., Lahelma E. Making spaces. Citizenship and difference in schools 2000, St. Martin's Press & MacMillan Press, New York & London.
38. Gordon T., Lahelma E., Hynninen P., Metso T., Palmu T., Tolonen T. Learning the routines: " professionalization" of newcomers in secondary school. Qualitative Studies in Education 1999, 12(6):689-705.
39. Greene, C. (2009). Conversation analysis: A study of institutional interaction and gender in a Russian classroom. University of Alberta. Available at: [Accessed 28.4.2010]. http://hdl.handle.net/10048/393.
40. Günthner S. The prosodic contextualisation of moral work: An analysis of reproaches in " why" -formats. Prosody in conversation 1996, 271-302. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. E. Couper-Kuhlen, M. Selting (Eds.).
41. Hakulinen A., Vilkuna M., Korhonen R., Koivisto V., Heinonen T.R., Alho I. Iso suomen kielioppi 2004, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki.
42. He A.W. The grammatical and interactional organization of teacher's directives: Implications for socialization of Chinese American Children. Linguistics and Education 2000, 11(2):119-140.
43. Heath C. Embarrassment and interactional organization. Erving Goffman. Exploring the interaction order 1988, 136-160. Polity Press, Cambridge. P. Drew, A. Wootton (Eds.).
44. Heikkilä M., Sahlström F. Om användning av videoinspelning i fältarbete. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige 2003, 8(1-2):24-31.
45. Hellermann J. Social actions for classroom language learning 2008, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK.
46. Heritage J. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology 1984, Polity, Cambridge, MA.
47. Hopper R., LeBaron C. How gender creeps into talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 1998, 31:59-74.
48. Hutchby I., Wooffitt R. Conversation analysis. Principles, practices and applications 1998, Polity Press, Bodmin, Cornwall.
49. Jayussi L. Categorisation and the moral order 1984, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
50. Jefferson G., Sacks H., Schegloff E.A. Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. Talk and social organisation 1987, 152-205. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon. G.J.E. Button, R. Lee (Eds.).
51. Jewitt C. Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education 2008, 32:241-267.
52. Jones R., Thornborrow J. Floors, talk, and the organization of classroom activities. Language in Society 2004, 33(3):399-423.
53. Jordan B., Henderson A. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1995, 4(1):39-103.
54. Julé A. Gender, participation and silence in the language classroom: Sh-shusshing the girls 2004, Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire.
55. Julkunen, K. (1998). Vieraan kielen oppiminen. A2-kielen opiskelijoiden motivaatio ja kielen valintaan vaikuttaneet tekijät [Foreign language learning. Students' motivation and the selection process of A2-language]. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopiston kirjasto.
56. Kitzinger C. Doing feminist conversation analysis. Talking gender and sexuality 2002, 49-77. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. Paul McIlvenny (Ed.).
57. Kitzinger C. " Speaking as heterosexual" : (How) does sexuality matter for talk in interaction?. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2005, 38(3):221-265.
58. Koole T. The interactive construction of heterogeneity in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 2003, 14(1):3-26.
59. Koshik I. Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 2003, 5(1):51-77.
60. Koffhoff H. Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 2003, 35:1387-1411.
61. Kress G., van Leeuwen T. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication 2001, Arnold, London.
62. Kääntä, L. (2010). Teacher turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction: A multisemiotic perspective. Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities. Available at [Accessed 28.4.2010]. http://urn.fi/URN%3AISBN%3A978-951-39-3811-6.
63. Lahelma E. Gendered conflicts in secondary school: Fun or enactment of power?. Gender and Education 2002, 14(3):295-306.
64. Lahelma E. Achieve and endure? Finnish girls at school. Politics of gender. A century of women's suffrage in Finland 2006, 85-91. Otava, Helsinki. A. Moring (Ed.).
65. Land V., Kitzinger C. Speaking as a lesbian: Correcting heterosexual presumptions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2005, 38(4):371-416.
66. Lappalainen, H. (2001). Variaationtutkimuksen ja keskustelunanalyysin näkökulmat toisiaan täydentämässä [Research on social variation and conversation analysis as complementing each others' perspectives]. In M. Halonen & S. Routarinne (Eds.), Keskustelunanalyysin näkymiä. [Views on Conversation Analysis] (pp. 155-184). Kieli 13. Helsingin yliopiston suomen kielen laitoksen julkaisuja.
67. Lappalainen, H. (2004). Variaatio ja sen funktiot. Erään sosiaalisen verkoston jäsenten kielellisen variaation ja vuorovaikutuksen tarkastelua [Variation and its fuctions. Linguistic varieties and interaction in a social network]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
68. Lappalainen S. School as 'survival game': Representations of school in transition from preschool to primary school. Ethnography and Education 2008, 3(2):115-127.
69. Feminist critical discourse analysis. Gender, power and ideology in discourse 2005, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, USA, Mass. M.M. Lazar (Ed.).
70. Lehtimaja, I. (2006). Oppilaiden välinen kiusoittelu luokkahuoneessa [Students teasing each other in classroom interaction]. In S. Kurhila & A. Mäntynen (Eds.), Tunnetta mukana [With feeling] (pp. 55-73). Kieli 17. Helsinki: Department of Finnish language and literature.
71. Lemke J.L. Talking science: Language. learning and values 1990, Ablex Publishing Corporation, New York.
72. Lerner G. Turn design and the participation in instructional activities. Discourse processes 1995, 19:111-131.
73. Lerner G. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: 'second person' reference in multi-party conversation. Pragmatics 1996, 6:281-294.
74. Lerner G. Selecting next speaker: The context sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society 2003, 32:177-201.
75. Lindroos M. Opetusdiskurssiin piirretty viiva. Tyttö ja poika luokkahuoneen vuorovaikutuksessa 1997, Department of Education, Helsinki.
76. Macbeth D.H. Classroom order as practical action: The making and un-making of a quiet reproach. The Journal of Sociology of Education 1990, 11(2):189-214.
77. Macbeth D.H. Teacher authority as practical action. Linguistics and Education 1991, 3(4):281-313.
78. Margutti P. Undermining the teacher's authority: How students respond to teachers' reproaches. Co-operation and conflict in ingroup and intergroup communication. Selected papers from the Xth Biennial Congress of the IADA Bucharest 2006, 407-419. L. Ionescu-Ruxanoiu (Ed.).
79. Markee N. Conversation analysis 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
80. Martin P.Y. Practicing gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization 2006, 13(3):254-276.
81. McHoul A. The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 1978, 7(2):183-213.
82. Talking gender and sexuality 2002, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. P. McIlvenny (Ed.).
83. McIlvenny P. Introduction: Researching talk, gender and sexuality. Talking gender and sexuality 2002, 1-48. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. P. McIlvenny (Ed.).
84. McNay L. Agency, anticipation and indeterminacy in feminist theory. Feminist Theory 2003, 4(2):139-148.
85. Monzoni C.M. Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of 'pre-sequences'?. Discourse Studies 2008, 10(1):73-87.
86. Norris S. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework 2004, Routledge New York, NY, London.
87. Ogden R. Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 2006, 38:1752-1775.
88. Ogden R., Hakulinen A., Tainio L. Indexing 'no news' with stylisation in Finnish. Sound patterns in interaction 2004, 299-334. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. E. Couper-Kuhlen, C. Ford (Eds.).
89. Ohara Y., Saft S. Using conversation analysis to track gender ideologies in social interaction: Toward a feminist analysis of a Japanese phone-in consultation TV program. Discourse & Society 2003, 14(2):153-172.
90. Palmu, T. (2003). Sukupuolen rakentuminen koulun kulttuurisissa teksteissä. Etnografia yläasteen äidinkielen oppitunneilla [Construction of gender in cultural texts in school. An ethnographic research on mother tongue lessons in secondary school]. Helsingin yliopiston kasvatustieteen laitoksen tutkimuksia 189. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
91. Pavlidou T.-S. Patterns of participation in classroom interaction: Girls' and boys' non-compliance in a Greek high school. Linguistics and Education 2003, 14(1):123-141.
92. Peräkylä A. Agency and authority: Extended responses to diagnostic statements in primary care encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2002, 35(2):219-247.
93. Piirainen-Marsh A. Koodinvaihto kontekstivihjeenä videopelitilanteessa. Kolmas kotimainen. Lähikuvia englannin käytöstä Suomessa 2008, 136-168. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki. S. Leppänen, T. Nikula, L. Kääntä (Eds.).
94. Piirainen-Marsh A., Tainio L. Other-repetition as a resource for participation in the activity of playing a video game. Modern Language Journal 2009, 93(2):153-169.
95. Raevaara L. Mitäs me sovittais" -s-partikkelin sisältävien hakukysymysten tehtävistä. Virittäjä 2004, 4(2004):531-558.
96. Ristevirta J. Hei pojat lopettakaas nyt. Opettajan työrauhavuorot oppitunnilla [Hey boys stop it now. Teachers' quiet reproaches in classroom]. Vuorovaikutusta luokkahuoneessa. Näkökulmana keskustelunanalyysi [Classroom interaction from Conversation Analytic perspective] 2007, 241-260. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. L. Tainio (Ed.).
97. Ristevirta, J. (2007b). Työrauhasekvenssi oppitunnilla [Reproach sequences in classroom interaction]. MA thesis, Department of Finnish language and literature, University of Helsinki.
98. Sacks H., Schegloff E., Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 1974, 50:696-735.
99. Sahlström F. Up the hill backwards. On interactional constraints and affordances for equity-constitution in the classrooms of the Swedish comprehensive school 1999, Uppsala Studies in Education, Uppsala, 85.
100. Sahlström F. Ssh! Om hyssjandetn i klassrum. The Finnish Journal of Education Kasvatus 2008, 39(5):456-467.
101. Saloviita, T. (2007). Työrauha luokkaan. Löydä omat toimintamallisi [Order in the classroom. Find your own practices] (p. 85). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
102. Schegloff E.A. Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. The micro-macro link 1987, 207-234. University of California Press, Berkeley. J.C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, N.J. Smelser (Eds.).
103. Schegloff E.A. Whose text? Whose context?. Discourse & Society 1997, 8(2):165-187.
104. Schegloff E.A. A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 2006, 39:462-482.
105. Schegloff E.A. Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorisation. Discourse Studies 2007, 9(4):433-461.
106. Schegloff E.A., Jefferson G., Sacks H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 1977, 53:361-382.
107. Seedhouse P. The interactional architecture of language classroom: A conversation analytic perspective 2004, Blackwell, Oxford.
108. Seppänen, E.-L. (1989). Henkilöön viittaaminen puhetilanteessa [Addressing in conversation]. In A. Hakulinen (Ed.), Suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja I [Practices in Finnish conversation I] (pp. 195-222). Kieli 4. Helsinki: Department of Finnish Language.
109. Speer S.A. Gender talk: Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis 2005, Routledge, London & New York.
110. Stebbins R.A. The role of humor in teaching: Strategy and self-expression. Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school 1982, 84-97. Croom Helm, London. P. Woods (Ed.).
111. Stokoe E. Talking about gender: The conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse. Discourse & Society 1998, 19:217-240.
112. Stokoe E. On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorical reference to gender in talk-in-interaction. The Sociological Review 2006, 54(3):467-494.
113. Stokoe E., Smithson J. Gender and sexuality in talk-in interaction: Considering conversation analytic perspectives. Talking gender and sexuality 2002, 79-110. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. P. McIlvenny (Ed.).
114. Sunnari V. Training women for the role of 'responsible other' in primary teacher education in Finland. European Journal of Teacher Education 2003, 26(2):217-227.
115. Svennevig J. Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies 2004, 6:489-516.
116. Tainio L. Negotiating gender identities and sexual agency in elderly couples' talk. Talking gender and sexuality 2002, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 181-206. P. McIlvenny (Ed.).
117. Tainio L. When shall we go for a ride?" : A case of sexual harassment of a young girl. Discourse & Society 2003, 14(2):173-190.
118. Tainio, L. (2006). Gender in Finnish Language Use: Equal, Inequal and/or Queer? WEB-FU 10/2006 (Wiener elektronische Beiträge des Instituts Finno-Ugristik). Universität Wien. [Accessed 12.6.2009]. http://webfu.univie.ac.at/inhalt.php.
119. Tainio L. Toisten puhujien matkiminen luokkahuoneessa. Nuoret kielikuvassa. Kouluikäisten kieli 2000-luvulla 2008, 148-164. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki. S. Routarinne, T. Uusi-Hallila (Eds.).
120. Tainio, L. (in press). Tunteet luokkahuoneessa-kriittisen asennoitumisen ilmaiseminen prosodian ja sen jäljittelyn keinoin [Emotions in classroom-taking critical stance with prosody and prosodical imitation]. In M-Haakana & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Tunnetta vuorovaikutuksessa [Emotions in interaction]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
121. Tholander M. Cross-gender teasing as a socializing practice. Discourse Processes 2002, 34(3):311-338.
122. Tholander M., Aronsson K. Doing subteaching in school group work. Positionings, resistance, and participation frameworks. Language and Education 2003, 17(3):208-234.
123. Thorne B. Gender play. Girls and boys in school 1993, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.
124. Tolonen T. Ääni, tila ja sukupuolten arkiset järjestykset 2001, Gaudeamus, Helsinki.
125. ten Have P. Doing conversation analysis. A practical guide 1999, Sage, London.
126. Vehviläinen S. Focus on the patient's action: Identifying and managing resistance in psychoanalytic interaction. Conversation analysis and psychotherapy 2008, 120-138. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, I. Leudar (Eds.).
127. Wadden P., McGovern S. The quandary of negative class participation: Coming to terms with misbehaviour in the language classroom. ELT Journal 1991, 45(2):119-127.
128. West C., Fenstermaker S. Power, inequality, and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological view. Theory on gender - feminism on theory 1993, 151-174. Aldine de Gruyter, New York. P. England (Ed.).
129. Woods P. Coping at school through humour. British Journal of Sociology of Education 1983, 4(2):111-124.
130. Wooffitt R. Conversation analysis and discourse analysis. A comparative and critical introduction 2005, Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.