Explaining sonority projection effects

Phonology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 197-234

  Daland, Robert ^a   Hayes, Bruce ^a   White, James ^a   Garellek, Marc ^a   Davis, Andrea ^b   Norrmann, Ingrid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82755191790     PISSN: 09526757     EISSN: 14698188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952675711000145     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Albright, Adam (2009). Feature-based generalisation as a source of gradient acceptability. Phonology 26. 9-41.
2. Albright, Adam (ms). Natural classes are not enough: biased generalization in novel onset clusters. MIT.
3. Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson & Douglas M. Bates (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 390-412.
4. Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Hedderik van Rijn (1995). The CELEX lexical database. [CD-ROM: Release 2.] Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
5. Baker C. L.(1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. LI 10. 533-581.
6. Bailey, Todd M. & Ulrike Hahn (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language 44. 568-591.
7. Baroni, Marco (2001). How do languages get crazy constraints? Phonetically-based phonology and the evolution of the Galeata Romagnolo vowel system. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 7: Papers in Phonology 5. 152-178.
8. Bates, David & Martin Maechler (2009). Package 'lme4' (Version 0.999375-32): linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Available (April 2011) at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf.
9. Berent, Iris (2008). Are phonological representations of printed and spoken language isomorphic? Evidence from the restrictions on unattested onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34. 1288-1304.
10. Berent, Iris, Tracy Lennertz, Jongho Jun, Miguel A. Moreno & Paul Smolensky (2008). Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105. 5321-5325.
11. Berent, Iris, Donca Steriade, Tracy Lennertz & Vered Vaknin (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition 104. 591-630.
12. Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
14. Clements, G. N. (1992). The Sonority Cycle and syllable organization. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds.) Phonologica 1988. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 63-76.
15. Coady, Jeffry A. & Julia L. Evans (2008). Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI). International Journal of Language Communication Disorders 43. 1-40.
16. Coetzee, Andries W. (2008). Grammaticality and ungrammaticality in phonology. Lg 84. 218-257.
17. Coetzee, Andries W. (2009). Grammar is both categorical and gradient. In Stephen G. Parker (ed.) Phonological argumentation: essays on evidence and motivation. London: Equinox. 9-42.
18. Coleman, John & Janet B. Pierrehumbert (1997). Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability. In John Coleman (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology. Somerset, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics. 49-56.
19. Coppieters, René (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Lg 63. 544-573.
20. Daland, Robert & Janet B. Pierrehumbert (2011). Learning diphone-based segmentation. Cognitive Science 35. 119-155.
21. Davidson, Lisa (2006). Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: influences on the production of non-native sequences. JPh 34. 104-137.
22. Davidson, Lisa (2007). The relationship between the perception of non-native phonotactics and loanword adaptation. Phonology 24. 261-286.
23. Davidson, Lisa (2010). Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: evidence from English and Catalan. JPh 38. 272-288.
24. Della Pietra, Stephen, Vincent Della Pietra & John Lafferty (1997). Inducing features of random fields. IEEE Transactions: Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19. 380-393.
25. Duanmu, San (2000). The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Dupoux, Emmanuel, Kazuhiko Kakehi, Yuki Hirose, Christophe Pallier & Jacques Mehler (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: a perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25. 1568-1578.
27. Edwards, Jan, Mary E. Beckman & Benjamin Munson (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47. 421-436.
28. Frisch, Stefan A., Janet B. Pierrehumbert & Michael B. Broe (2004). Similarity avoidance and the OCP. NLLT 22. 179-228.
29. Frisch, Stefan A. & Bushra Adnan Zawaydeh (2001). The psychological reality of OCP-place in Arabic. Lg 77. 91-106.
30. Gale, William A. & Geoffrey Sampson (1995). Good-Turing frequency estimation without tears. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 2. 217-237.
31. Goldrick, Matthew (in press). Utilizing psychological realism to advance phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.) The handbook of phonological theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Goldsmith, John & Jason Riggle (to appear). Information theoretic approaches to phonological structure: the case of vowel harmony. NLLT.
33. Goldwater, Sharon & Mark Johnson (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a ̈ Maximum Entropy model. In Jennifer Spenador, Anders Eriksson & Osten Dahl (eds.) Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory. Stockholm: Stockholm University. 111-120.
34. Hay, Jennifer, Janet B. Pierrehumbert & Mary E. Beckman (2003). Speech perception, well-formedness and the statistics of the lexicon. In John Local, Richard Ogden & Rosalind Temple (eds.) Phonetic interpretation: papers in laboratory phonology VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 58-74.
35. Hayes, Bruce (in press). Interpreting sonority-projection experiments: the role of phonotactic modeling. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
36. Hayes, Bruce, Robert Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hayes, Bruce & Donca Steriade (2004). Introduction: the phonetic bases of phonological Markedness. In Hayes et al. (2004). 1-33.
38. Hayes, Bruce & Colin Wilson (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. LI 39. 379-440.
39. Hockett, Charles F. (1947). Peiping phonology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 67. 253-267.
40. Reprinted in Martin Joos (ed.) (1966). Readings in linguistics I. 4th edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 217-228.
41. Hooper, Joan B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
42. Jespersen, Otto (1904). Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig & Berlin: Teubner.
43. Joseph, John E. (1995). Natural grammar, arbitrary lexicon: an enduring parallel in the history of linguistic thought. Language and Communication 15. 213-225.
44. Jurafsky, Daniel & James H. Martin (2009). Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. 2nd edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
45. Kager, René & Joe Pater (ms). Phonotactics as phonology: knowledge of a complex restriction in Dutch. University of Utrecht & University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
46. Kawahara, Shigeto (2008). Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17. 317-330.
47. Kawahara, Shigeto (2011). Modes of phonological judgment. Ms, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-1140 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
48. Koo, Hahn & Jennifer Cole (2006). On learnability and naturalness as constraints on phonological grammar. In Antonis Botinis (ed.) Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics. Athens: University of Athens. 165-168.
49. Lee, Yongsung (1994). Onset analysis of Korean on-glides. In Young-Key Kim-Renaud (ed.) Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics. Stanford: CSLI. 133-156.
50. Legendre, Géraldine, Yoshiro Miyata & Paul Smolensky (1990). Harmonic Grammar: a formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: an application. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 884-891.
51. McFadden, Daniel (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In Paul Zarembka (ed.) Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press. 105-142.
52. Manning, Christopher D. & Hinrich Schütze (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
53. Parker, Stephen G. (2002). Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available (May 2011) at http://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3056268.
54. Pater, Joe (2009). Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33. 999-1035.
55. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2006). The statistical basis of an unnatural alternation. In Louis Goldstein, D. H. Whalen & Catherine T. Best (eds.) Laboratory Phonology 8. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 81-106.
56. Potts, Christopher, Joe Pater, Karen Jesney, Rajesh Bhatt & Michael Becker (2010). Harmonic Grammar with linear programming: from linear systems to linguistic typology. Phonology 27. 77-117.
57. Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
58. R Development Core Team (2006). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available (May 2011) at http://www.r-project.org.
59. Ren, Jie, Liqun Gao & James L. Morgan (2010). Mandarin speakers' knowledge of the sonority sequencing principle. Paper presented at the 20th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
60. Selkirk, Elizabeth (1982). The syllable. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part 2. Dordrecht: Foris. 337-383.
61. Selkirk, Elisabeth (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oerhle (eds.) Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 107-136.
62. Sievers, Eduard (1881). Grundzüge der Phonetik, zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
63. Smolensky, Paul & Géraldine Legendre (2006). The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
64. Steriade, Donca (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. PhD dissertation, MIT.
65. Vitevitch, Michael S. & Paul A. Luce (2004). A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36. 481-487.
66. Wilson, Colin & Lisa Davidson (in press). Bayesian analysis of non-native cluster production. NELS 40.
67. Wright, Richard (2004). A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In Hayes et al. (2004). 34-57.