Grammaticality and ungrammaticality in phonology

Language

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 218-257

  Coetzee, Andries W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049112447     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: 15350665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0000     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. ALDERETE, JOHN. 1997. Dissimilation as local conjunction. North Eastern Linguistic Society 27.17-32.
2. BAAYEN, R.HARALD; RICHARD PIEPENBROCK; and LEON GULIKERS. 1995. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
3. BAERTSCH, KAREN, and STUART DAVIS. 2003. The split margin approach to syllable structure. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 32.1-14.
4. BAILEY, TODD M., and ULRIKE HAHN. 1998. Determinants of wordlikeness. Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by Morton Ann Gernsbacher and Sharon J. Derry, 90-95. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. BAILEY, TODD M., and ULRIKE HAHN. 2001. Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods. Journal of Memory and Language 44.568-91.
6. BALOTA, DAVID A., and JAMES I. CHUMBLEY. 1984. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10.340-57.
7. BERENT, IRIS; DANIEL L. EVERETT; and JOSEPH SHIMRON. 2001. Do phonological representations specify variables? Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cognitive Psychology 42.1-60.
8. BERENT, IRIS; GARY F. MARCUS; JOSEPH SHIMRON; and ADAMANTIOS GAFOS. 2002. The scope of linguistic generalizations: Evidence from Hebrew word formation. Cognition 83.113-39.
9. BERENT, IRIS, and JOSEPH SHIMRON. 1997. The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cognition 64.39-72.
10. BERENT, IRIS; JOSEPH SHIMRON; and VERED VAKNIN. 2001. Phonological constraints on reading: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Journal of Memory and Language 44.644-65.
11. BERENT, IRIS; DONCA STERIADE; TRACY LENNERTZ; and VERED VAKNIN. 2007. What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition 104.591-630.
12. BERKLEY, DEBORAH M. 2000. Gradient obligatory contour principle effects. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University dissertation.
13. BOERSMA, PAUL. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
14. BOERSMA, PAUL, and BRUCE HAYES. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32.45-86.
15. BROSELOW, ELLEN. 1991. The structure of fricative-stop onsets. Stony Brook: State University of New York, MS.
16. BROWNE, WAYLES. 1981. Slavic -ba and English *slil: Two persistent constraints. Folia Slavica 4.219-25.
17. BURZIO, LUIGI. 1995. The rise of optimality theory. Glot International 1.6.3-7.
18. BYBEE, JOAN. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82.711-33.
19. CHOMSKY, NOAM. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. CHOMSKY, NOAM. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. CHOMSKY, NOAM, and MORRIS HALLE. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
22. CLEMENTS, GEORGE N., and SAMUEL J. KEYSER. 1983. CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. COETZEE, ANDRIES W. 2004. What it means to be a loser: Non-optimal candidates in optimality theory. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
24. COETZEE, ANDRIES W. 2005. The OCP in the perception of English. Prosodies, ed. by Sonia Frota, Marina Vigario, and Maria Joao Freitas, 223-45. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. COETZEE, ANDRIES W. 2006. Variation as accessing 'non-optimal' candidates. Phonology 23.337-85.
26. COETZEE, ANDRIES W. 2008. Grammar is both categorical and gradient. Phonological argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation, ed. by Stephen Parker. London: Equinox, to appear.
27. COETZEE, ANDRIES W., and JOE PATER. 2008. Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, to appear.
28. COLEMAN, JOHN, and JANET P IERREHUMBERT. 1997. Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability. Computational phonology: Third meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology, 49-56. Somerset: Association for Computational Linguistics.
29. CONNINE, CYNTHIA M.; DEBRA TITONE; and JIAN WANG. 1993. Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19.81-94.
30. CUTLER, ANNE; JACQUES MEHLER; DENNIS NORRIS; and JUAN SEGUÍ. 1987. Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology 19.141-77.
31. DAVIDSON, LISA. 2006. Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics 34.104-37.
32. DAVIS, STUART. 1982. On the internal organization of syllable constituents. Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics of the University of Arizona 3.3-22.
33. DAVIS, STUART. 1988a. Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 5.1-19.
34. DAVIS, STUART. 1988b. Topics in syllable geometry. (Outstanding dissertations in linguistics.) New York: Garland.
35. DAVIS, STUART. 1989. Cross-vowel phonotactic constraints. Computational Linguistics 15.109-10.
36. DAVIS, STUART. 1991. Coronals and the phonotactics of nonadjacent consonants in English. The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence, ed. by Carole Paradis and Jean-Francois Prunet, 49-60. San Diego: Academic Press.
37. DE LACY, PAUL. 2007. Freedom, interpretability, and the loop. Freedom of analysis, ed. by Patrik Bye, Martin Krämer, and Sylvia Blaho, 86-118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. DUPOUX, EMMANUEL; KAZUHIKO KAKEHI; YUKI HIROSE; CHRISTOPHE PALLIER; and JACQUES MEHLER. 1999. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: Aperceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25.1568-78.
39. DUPOUX, EMMANUEL; CHRISTOPHE PALLIER; KAZUHIKO KAKEHI; and JACQUES MEHLER. 2001. New evidence for prelexical phonological processing in word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 16.491-505.
40. EPSTEIN, SAMUEL D. 2000 [1990]. Differentiation and reduction in syntactic theory: A case study. Essays in syntactic theory, ed. by Samuel D. Epstein, 83-93. New York: Routledge. [Originally appeared in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8.313-23, 1990.]
41. FIRTH, JOHN R. 1935. The use and distribution of certain English sounds. English Studies: A Journal of English Letters and Philology 17.8-18.
42. FIRTH, JOHN R. 1935-37. Alphabets and phonology in India and Burma. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Research 8.517-46.
43. FRISCH, STEFAN A.; JANET B. PIERREHUMBERT; and MICHAEL BROE. 2004. Similarity avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.179-228.
44. FRISCH, STEFAN A.; NATHAN R. LARGE; BUSHRA A. ZAWAYDEH; and DAVID B. PISONI. 2001. Emergent phonotactic generalizations in English and Arabic. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, ed. by Joan L. Bybee and Paul Hopper, 159-79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45. FRISCH, STEFAN A., and BUSHRA A. ZAWAYDEH. 2001. The psychological reality of OCP-Place in Arabic. Language 77.91-106.
46. FUDGE, ERIK C. 1969. Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 5.253-86.
47. FUJIMURA, OSAMU, and JULIE B. LOVINS. 1978. Syllables as concatenative phonetic units. Syllables and segments, ed. by Alan Bell and Joan B. Hooper, 107-20. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
48. GANONG, WILLIAM F. 1980. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6.110-25.
49. GOUSKOVA, MARIA. 2001. Falling sonority onsets, loanwords, and syllable contact. Chicago Linguistic Society 37.175-85.
50. GREENBERG, JOSEPH H. 1978. Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. Universals of human language, vol. 2, ed. by Edith A. Moravcsik, 243-79. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51. HALLE, MORRIS. 1962. Phonology in a generative grammar. Word 18.54-72.
52. HAY, JENNIFER; JANET B. PIERREHUMBERT; and MARY E. BECKMAN. 2003. Speech perception, well-formedness and the statistics of the lexicon. Phonetic interpretation: Papers in laboratory phonology 6, ed. by John Local, Richard Ogden, and Rosalind Temple, 58-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. HAYES, BRUCE. 1985. A metrical theory of stress rules. New York: Garland.
54. HAYES, BRUCE. 2004. Phonological acquisition in optimality theory: The early stages. Fixing priorities: Constraints in phonological acquisition, ed. by René Kager, Joe Pater, and Wim Zonneveld, 158-203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. HAYES, BRUCE; ROBERT M. KIRCHNER; and DONCA STERIADE (eds.) 2004. Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. HAYES, BRUCE, and COLIN WILSON. 2008. A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry, to appear.
57. HOCKETT, CHARLES F. 1955. A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
58. HUME, ELIZABETH V., and KEITH JOHNSON (eds.) 2001. The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
59. ITÔ , JUNKO. 1989. A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7.217-59.
60. ITÔ , JUNKO, and ARMINMESTER. 1997. Sympathy theory and German truncations. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 5.117-39.
61. ITÔ, JUNKO, and ARMIN MESTER. 1998. Markedness and word structure: OCP effects in Japanese. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz, MS
62. ITÔ , JUNKO, and ARMIN MESTER. 1999. The structure of the phonological lexicon. The handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. by Natsuko Tsujimura, 62-100. Oxford: Blackwell.
63. KABAK, BARIS, and WILLIAM J. IDSARDI. 2007. Perceptual distortions in the adaptation of English consonant clusters: Syllable structure or consonantal contact constraints? Language and Speech 50.23-52.
64. KAGER, RENÉ , and KEREN SHATZMAN. 2007. Phonological constraints in speech processing. Paper presented at workshop on Experimental Approaches to Optimality Theory, Ann Arbor, MI.
65. KAHN, DANIEL. 1980. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. New York: Garland.
66. KAWAHARA, SHIGETO; HAJIME ONO; and KIYOSHI SUDO. 2006. Consonant co-occurrence restrictions in Yamato Japanese. Japanese/Korean linguistics 14, ed. by Timothy J. Vance and Kimberly Jones, 27-38. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
67. KISSEBERTH, CHARLES. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1.291-306.
68. LAMONTAGNE, GREG. 1993. Syllabification and consonant cooccurrence conditions. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
69. LEGENDRE, GERALDINE; ANTONELLA SORACE; and PAUL SMOLENSKY. 2006. The optimality theory-harmonic grammar connection. The harmonic mind, vol. 2, ed. by Geraldine Legendre and Paul Smolensky, 339-402. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. LUCE, PAUL A. 1986. Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University, Department of Psychology, MS.
71. LUCE, PAUL A., and DAVID B. PISONI. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19.1-35.
72. MASSARO, DOMINIC W., and MICHAEL M. COHEN. 1983. Phonological context in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 34.338-48.
73. MCCARTHY, JOHN J. 1985. Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. New York: Garland.
74. MCCARTHY, JOHN J. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 7.207-63.
75. MCCARTHY, JOHN J. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. Papers in laboratory phonology 3, ed. by Patricia Keating, 191-283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. MCCARTHY, JOHN J. 2002. A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. MCCARTHY, JOHN J. 2003. Rotuman consonant cooccurrence restrictions. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, MS.
78. MCCARTHY, JOHN J., and ALAN PRINCE. 1993. Prosodic morphology 1: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. (Report no. RuCCS-TR-3.) New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, MS.
79. MCCARTHY, JOHN J., and ALAN PRINCE. 1994. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. North Eastern Linguistic Society 24.333-79.
80. MCCARTHY, JOHN J., and ALAN PRINCE. 2003. The emergence of the unmarked. Optimality theory in phonology: A reader, ed. by John J. McCarthy, 483-94. Oxford: Blackwell.
81. MESTER, ARMIN. 1986. Studies in tier structure. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation
82. MORETON, ELLIOTT. 2002. Structural constraints in the perception of English stop-sonorant clusters. Cognition 84.55-71.
83. MORETON, ELLIOTT. 2006. Underphonologization and modularity bias. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, MS.
84. MYERS, SCOTT. 1997. OCP effects in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15.847-92.
85. NEWMAN, ROCHELLE S.; JAMES R. SAWUSCH; and PAUL A. LUCE. 1997. Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 23.873-89.
86. ODDEN, DAVID. 1986. On the role of the obligatory contour principle in phonological theory. Language 62.353-83.
87. OHALA, JOHN J. 1986. Consumer's guide to evidence in phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3.3-26.
88. PADGETT, JAYE. 1995. Stricture in feature geometry. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
89. PATER, JOE. 2005. Learning a stratified grammar. Proceedings of the 29th Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. by Alejna Brugos, Manuella R. Clark-Cotton, and Seungwan Ha, 482-92. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
90. PATER, JOE, and ANDRIES W. COETZEE. 2005. Lexically specific constraints: Gradience, learnability, and perception. Proceedings of the Korea International Conference on Phonology, 85-119. Seoul: The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea.
91. PATER, JOE; RAJESH BHATT; and CHRISTOPHER POTTS. 2007. Linguistic optimization. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, MS.
92. PEPERKAMP, SHARON; ROZENN LE CALVEZ; JEAN-PIERRE NADAL; and EMMANUEL DUPOUX. 2006. The acquisition of allophonic rules: Statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition 101.B31-B42.
93. PIERREHUMBERT, JANET B. 1993. Dissimilarity in the Arabic verbal roots. North Eastern Linguistic Society 23.367-81.
94. PIERREHUMBERT, JANET B.; MARY E. BECKMAN; and D. ROBERT LADD. 2000. Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science. Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr, and Gerard Docherty, 273-303. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95. PITT, MARK A. 1998. Phonological processes and the perception of phonologically illegal consonant clusters. Perception and Psychophysics 60.941-51.
96. PRINCE, ALAN, and PAUL SMOLENSKY. 1993 [2004]. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. (Report no. RuCCS-TR-2.) New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, MS. [Published by Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.]
97. PRINCE, ALAN, and BRUCE TESAR. 2004. Learning phonotactic distributions. Fixing priorities: Constraints in phonological acquisition, ed. by Rene Kager, Joe Pater, and Wim Zonneveld, 245-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. SAGEY, ELISABETH. 1988. On the ill-formedness of crossing association lines. Linguistic Inquiry 19.109-18.
99. SELKIRK, ELISABETH O. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
100. SILVA, DAVID J. 2004. Quantified optimality and the phonological parsing of Korean SOV sentences. Korean Linguistics 12.25-54.
101. SMOLENSKY, PAUL. 1995. On the internal structure of the constraint component CON of UG. Talk presented at the University of California, Los Angeles, April 7, 1995.
102. SMOLENSKY, PAUL. 1996. On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 27.720-31.
103. SMOLENSKY, PAUL, and GÉRALDINE LEGENDRE. 2006. The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. Vol. 1: Cognitive architecture. Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
104. SPANG-HANSSEN, HENNING. 1959. Probability and structural classification in language description. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger.
105. TESAR, BRUCE. 1998. An iterative strategy for language learning. Lingua 104.131-45.
106. TESAR, BRUCE, and PAUL SMOLENSKY. 1998. Learnability in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 29.229-68.
107. TESAR, BRUCE, and PAUL SMOLENSKY. 2000. Learnability in optimality theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108. TREIMAN, REBECCA; BRETT KESSLER; STEPHANIE KNEWASSER; RUTH TINCOFF; and MARGO BOWMAN. 2000. English speakers' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns. Papers in laboratory phonology 5: Acquisition and the lexicon, ed. by Michael B. Broe and Janet B. Pierrehumbert, 269-82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109. TWADDELL, WILLIAM F. 1939. Combinations of consonants in stressed syllables in German. Acta Linguistica 1.189-99.
110. TWADDELL, WILLIAM F. 1940. Combinations of consonants in stressed syllables in German. Acta Linguistica 2.31-50.
111. UHLENBECK, EUGENIUS M. 1949. De structuur van het Javaanse morpheem. Bandung: Nix.
112. VITEVITCH, MICHAEL S., and PAUL A. LUCE. 1998. When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science 9.325-29.
113. VITEVITCH, MICHAEL S., and PAUL A. LUCE. 1999. Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 40.374-408.
114. WILSON, COLIN. 2006. Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30.945-82.
115. YIP, MOIRA. 1989. Feature geometry and co-occurrence restrictions. Phonology 6.349-74.
116. ZURAW, KIE. 2007. The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: Corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog infixation. Language 83.277-316.