Areview of perceptual cues and cue robustness

Phonetically Based Phonology

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 34-57

  Wright, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926984889     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486401.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.
2. Ali, L., T. Gallagher, J. Goldstein, and R. Daniloff (1971). Perception of coarticulated nasality. JASA 49: 538-40.
3. Bailey, P. J. and Q. Summerfield (1980). Information in speech: Observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6: 536-63.
4. Bell, A. and J. B. Hooper (eds.) (1978). Syllables and Segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
5. Bladon, Anthony (1986). Phonetics for hearers. In Graham McGregor (ed.), Language for hearers. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1-24.
6. Bloch, B. and G. Trager (1942). Outlines of linguistic analysis. Baltimore: LSA Special Publications.
7. Bregmen, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Brosches, C. de (1765). Traité de la formation méchanique de langues, et de principes physiques de l'étymologie. Paris: Chez Saillant, Vincent, Desaint.
9. Byrd, D. (1996a). A phase window framework for articulatory timing. Phonology 13: 139-69.
10. Byrd, D. (1996b). Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. JPhon 24: 209-44.
11. Clarey, J. C., P. Barone, andT. J. Imig (1992). Physiology of thalamus and cortex. In A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay (eds.), The mammalian auditory pathway: Neurophysiology. New York: Springer Verlag.
12. Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority hierarchy in core syllabification. In J. Kingston and M. E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283-333.
13. Cole, R. A. and W. E. Cooper (1975). Perception of voicing in English affricates and fricatives. JASA 58: 1280-7.
14. Delattre, P. C., A. M. Liberman, and F. S. Cooper (1955). Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants. JASA 27: 769-73.
15. Delgutte, B. and N.Y. S. Kiang (1984a). Speech coding in the auditory nerve: IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics. JASA 75: 897-907.
16. Delgutte, B. and N.Y. S. Kiang (1984b). Speech coding in the auditory nerve: III. Voiceless fricative consonants. JASA 75: 887-96.
17. Dorman, M. F., M. Studdert-Kennedy, and L. J. Raphael (1977). Stop-consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, contextdependent cues. Perception and Psychophysics 22: 109-22.
18. Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (1992). Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semi-vowels /w j r l/in English. JASA 92: 736-51.
19. Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.
20. Flemming, E. (1995). Auditory representations in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
21. Flemming, E. (2002). Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.
22. Gerstman, L. J. (1968). Classification of self-normalized vowels. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 16: 78-80.
23. Gordon, M. (1999). Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology and typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
24. Greenberg, S. and S. Rhode (1987). Periodicity coding in the cochlear nerve and ventral cochlear nucleus. In W. A. Yost and C. S. Watson (eds.), Auditory processing of complex sounds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Hagiwara, R. (1995). Acoustic realizations of American /r/as produced by women and men. PhD, University of California, Los Angeles.
26. Harris, K. S. (1958). Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Language and Speech 1: 1-7.
27. Hawkins, S. and K. N. Stevens (1985). Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the nonnasal-nasal distinction for vowels. JASA 77: 1560-75.
28. Heinz, J.M.and K. N. Stevens (1961).Onthe properties of voiceless fricative consonants. JASA 33: 589-96.
29. House, A. S. (1957). Analog studies of nasal consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 22: 190-204.
30. Jespersen, O. (1913). Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
31. Jun, J. (1995). Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An optimality theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
32. Kawasaki, H. (1982). An acoustic basis for universal constraints on sound sequences. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
33. Keating, P. A. (1983). Comments on the jaw and syllable structure. JPhon 11: 401-6.
34. Kewley-Port, D., D. B. Pisoni, and M. Studdert-Kennedy (1983). Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants. JASA 73: 1779-93.
35. Kiang, N. Y. S., T.Watanabe, E. C. Thomas, and L. F. Clark (1965). Discharge patterns of single fibres in the cat's auditory nerve. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Kirchner, R. (1997). Contrastiveness and faithfulness. Phonology 14: 83-111.
37. Kirchner, R. (2000). Geminate inalterability and lenition. Lg 76: 509-45.
38. Kurowski, K. M. and S. E. Blumstein (1984). Acoustic properties for place of articulation in nasals. JASA 81: 1917-27.
39. Liberman, A. M. and I. G. Mattingly (1989). A specialization for speech perception. Science 243: 489-94.
40. Liberman, A. M., P. C. Delattre, L. J. Gerstman, and F. S. Cooper (1956). Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology 52: 127-37.
41. Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 6: 172-87.
42. Lindblom, B. (1983). Economy of speech gestures. In P. F. MacNeilage (ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer-Verlag, 217-45.
43. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H and H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 403-39.
44. Lindblom, B. E. and M. Studdert-Kennedy (1967). On the rôle of formant-transitions in vowel recognition. JASA 42: 830-43.
45. Lisker, L. and A. S. Abramson (1970). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Prague: Academia, 563-67.
46. Malécot, A. (1956). Acoustic cues for nasal consonants:Anexperimental study involving tape-splicing techniques. Lg 32: 274-84.
47. Massaro, D.W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Massaro, D. W. and M. M. Cohen (1983). Consonant/vowel ratio: An improbable cue in speech. Perception and Psychophysics 33: 501.
49. Mattingly, I. G. (1981). Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule. In T. Myers, J. Laver, and J. Anderson (eds.), The cognitive representation of speech. Amsterdam: North Holland, 415-20.
50. Miller, G. and P. Nicely (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among English consonants. JASA 27: 338-52.
51. Miller, M. I. and M. B. Sachs (1983). Representation of stop consonants in the discharge patterns of auditory nerve fibres. JASA 74: 502-17.
52. Møller, A. R. (1977). Coding of time-varying sounds in the cochlear nucleus. Audiology 17: 446-68.
53. Nygaard, L. C. and D. B. Pisoni (1995). Speech perception: New directions in research and theory. In J. L. Miller and P. D. Eimas (eds.), Speech, language, and communication. San Diego: Academic Press, 63-96.
54. O'Connor, J. D., L. J. Gerstman, A. M. Liberman, P. C. Delattre, and F. S. Cooper (1957). Acoustic cues for the perception of initial /w, j, r, l/in English. Word 13: 24-43.
55. Ohala, J. J. (1992). Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental constraints. In Papers from the parasession on the syllable. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 319-38.
56. Repp, B. H. (1979). Relative amplitude of aspiration noise as a voicing cue for syllableinitial stop consonants. Language and Speech 22: 173-89.
57. Repp, B. H. and V. A. Mann (1981). Perceptual assessment of fricative-stop coarticulation. JASA 69: 1154-63.
58. Saussure, F. de (1914). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
59. Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Shadle, C. H. (1991). The effect of geometry on source mechanisms of fricative consonants. JPhon 19: 409-24.
61. Shinn, P. and S. E. Blumstein (1984). On the role of the amplitude envelope for the perception of [b] and [w]. JASA 75: 1243-52.
62. Sievers, E. (1881). Grundzüge der Phonetic. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel.
63. Silverman, D. (1997). Phasing and recoverability. New York: Garland.
64. Sinex, D. G. (1995). Auditory nerve fibre representation of cues to voicing in syllablefinal stop contexts. JASA 90: 2441-9.
65. Sinex, D. G. and C. D. Geisler (1983). Responses of auditory-nerve fibres to consonantvowel syllables. JASA 73: 602-15.
66. Smith, R. L. and J. J. Zwislocki (1979). Short-term adaptation and incremental responses of single auditory-nerve fibres. Biological Cybernetics 17: 169-82.
67. Soli, S. D. (1981). Second formants in fricatives: Acoustic consequences of fricativevowel coarticulation. JASA 70: 976-84.
68. Steriade, Donca (1995). Positional neutralization. Ms., Department of Linguistics, UCLA. http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/steriade/papers/PositionalNeutralization. pdf.
69. Stevens, K. N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. JPhon 17: 3-45.
70. Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Stevens, K. N. and A. S. House (1963). Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: An acoustical study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 6: 111-28.
72. Stevens, K. N. and S. J. Keyser (1989). Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Lg 65: 81-106.
73. Strange, W. J., J. J. Jenkins, and T. L. Johnson (1983). Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. JASA 74: 695-705.
74. Syrdal, A. K. and H. S. Gopal (1986). A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. JASA 79: 1086-100.
75. Van Dommelen, W. (1982). A contrastive investigation of vowel duration in German and Dutch. Phonetica 39: 23-35.
76. Walley, A. C. and T. D. Carrell (1983). Onset spectra and formant transitions in the adult's and child's perception of place of articulation in stop consonants. JASA 73: 1011-22.
77. Whitney, W. D. (1874). Oriental and linguistics studies. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
78. Wright, Richard (1996). Consonant clusters and cue preservation in Tsou. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
79. Wright, Richard (2001). Perceptual cues in contrast maintenance. In E. Hume and K. Johnson (eds.), The role of speech perception phenomena in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press, 251-77.
80. Wright, Richard (2004). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In J. Local (ed.), Papers in laboratory phonology VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Wright, R., S. Frisch, and D. B. Pisoni (1999). Speech perception. In J. G.Webster (ed.), Wiley encyclopedia of electrical and electronic engineering. New York: JohnWiley and Sons, Vol. 20, 175-95.