Feature-based generalisation as a source of gradient acceptability

Phonology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 9-41

  Albright, Adam ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249097196     PISSN: 09526757     EISSN: 14698188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952675709001705     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Albright, Adam (2002a). Islands of reliability for regular morphology: evidence from Italian. Lg 78. 684-709
2. Albright, Adam (2002b). The lexical bases of morphological well-formedness. In Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Maria D. Voeikova (eds.) Morphology 2000. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 5-15
3. Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes (2002). Modeling English past tense intuitions with minimal generalization. In Mike Maxwell (ed.) Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Phonology. Philadelphia: Association for Computational Linguistics. 58-69
4. Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition 90. 119-161
5. Auer, Edward T., Jr. & Paul A. Luce (2005). Probabilistic phonotactics in spoken word recognition. In David B. Pisoni & Robert E. Remez (eds.) The handbook of speech perception. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 610-630
6. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Baayen, R. H., Richard Piepenbrock & Hedderik van Rijn (1993). The CELEX lexical data base. [CD-ROM.] Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania
8. Bailey, Todd M. & Ulrike Hahn (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language 44. 568-591
9. Bates, David, Martin Maechler & Bin Dai (2008). The lme4 Package (Version 0.999375-28): linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Available (March 2009) at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf
10. Berent, Iris, Donca Steriade, Tracy Lennertz & Vered Vaknin (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition 104. 591-630
11. Berko, Jean (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150-177
12. Berwick, Robert C. (1986). Learning from positive-only examples: the subset principle and three case studies. In Jaime Guillermo Carbonell, Ryszard S. Michalski & Tom M. Mitchell (eds.) Machine learning: an artificial intelligence approach. Vol. 2. Los Altos, Ca.: Kaufmann. 625-645
13. Buchwald, Adam (2007). Determining well-formedness in phonology: type vs. token frequency. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Anaheim
14. Bybee, Joan (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 425-455
15. Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row
16. Clements, G. N. & Samuel J. Keyser (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
17. Coleman, John & Janet Pierrehumbert (1997). Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability. In John Coleman (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology. Somerset, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics. 49-56
18. Coltheart, Max, Eileen Davelaar, Jon Torfi Jonasson & Derek Besner (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In Stan Dornic (ed.) Attention and performance. Vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 535-555
19. Davis, Stuart (1984). Some implications of onset-coda constraints for syllable phonology. CLS 20. 46-51
20. Frisch, Stefan A., Nathan R. Large & David B. Pisoni (2000). Perception of wordlikeness: effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language 42. 481-496
21. Greenberg, Joseph H. & James J. Jenkins (1964). Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word 20. 157-177
22. Hammond, Michael (1999). The phonology of English: a prosodic optimality-theoretic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press
23. Hay, Jennifer (2003). Causes and consequences of word structure. New York & London: Routledge
24. Hay, Jennifer, Janet Pierrehumbert & Mary E. Beckman (2004). Speech perception, well-formedness and the statistics of the lexicon. In John Local, Richard Ogden & Rosalind Temple (eds.) Phonetic interpretation : papers in laboratory phonology VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 58-74
25. Hayes, Bruce (2004). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages. In Kager et al. (2004). 158-203
26. Hayes, Bruce & Colin Wilson (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. LI 39. 379-440
27. Jurafsky, Daniel & James H. Martin (2000). Speech and language processing : an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
28. Jusczyk, Peter W., Paul A. Luce & Jan Charles-Luce (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33. 630-645
29. Kager, René, Joe Pater & Wim Zonneveld (eds.) (2004). Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30. Kendall, Maurice G. (1990). Rank correlation methods. 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press
31. Kessler, Brett & Rebecca Treiman (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language 37. 295-311
32. Luce, Paul A. (1986). Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon. Technical report, Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Indiana University
33. Luce, Paul A. & David B. Pisoni (1998). Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19. 1-36
34. Newman, Rochelle S., James R. Sawusch & Paul A. Luce (1997). Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23. 873-889
35. Nosofsky, Robert M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115. 39-57
36. Ohala, John J. & Manjari Ohala (1986). Testing hypotheses regarding the psychological manifestation of morpheme structure constraints. In John J. Ohala & Jeri Jaeger (eds.) Experimental phonology. Orlando: Academic Press. 239-252
37. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 137-157
38. Pinheiro, José C. & Douglas M. Bates (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer
39. Pitt, Mark A. & James M. McQueen (1998). Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory and Language 39. 347-370
40. Prasada, Sandeep & Steven Pinker (1993). Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8. 1-56
41. Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell
42. Prince, Alan & Bruce Tesar (2004). Learning phonotactic distributions. In Kager et al. (2004). 245-291
43. R Development Core Team (2008). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available (March 2009) at http://www.r-project.org
44. Ramscar, Michael & Daniel Yarlett (2003). Semantic grounding in models of analogy: an environmental approach. Cognitive Science 27. 41-71
45. Saul, Lawrence & Fernando Pereira (1997). Aggregate and mixed-order Markov models for statistical language processing. In Claire Cardie & Ralph Weischedel (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Somerset, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics. 81-89
46. Scholes, Robert J. (1966). Phonotactic grammaticality. The Hague: Mouton
47. Schütze, Carson T. (2005). Thinking about what we are asking speakers to do. In Stephan Kepser & Marga Reis (eds.) Linguistic evidence: empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 457-484
48. Selkirk, Elizabeth O. (1982). The syllable. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part 2. Dordrecht: Foris. 337-384
49. Sendlmeier, Walter F. (1987). Auditive judgements of word similarity. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 40. 538-547
50. Shademan, Shabnam (2006). Is phonotactic knowledge grammatical knowledge? WCCFL 25. 371-379
51. Shademan, Shabnam (2007). Grammar and analogy in phonotactic well-formedness judgments. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles
52. Sheskin, David J. (2004). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. 3rd edn. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall
53. Tessier, Anne-Michelle (2006). Biases and stages in phonological acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
54. Vitevitch, Michael S. & Paul A. Luce (1998). When words compete: levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science 9. 325-329
55. Vitevitch, Michael S. & Paul A. Luce (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 40. 374-408
56. Vitevitch, Michael S. & Paul A. Luce (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36. 481-487
57. Vitevitch, Michael S. & Paul A. Luce (2005). Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. Journal of Memory and Language 52. 193-204
58. Vitevitch, Michael S., Paul A. Luce, Jan Charles-Luce & David Kemmerer (1996). Phonotactic and metrical influences on adult ratings of spoken nonsense words. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP). 82-85
59. Vitevitch, Michael S., Paul A. Luce, Jan Charles-Luce & David Kemmerer (1997). Phonotactics and syllable stress : implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech 40. 47-62