Introduction: The phonetic bases of phonological markedness

Phonetically Based Phonology

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-33

  Hayes, Bruce ^a   Steriade, Donca ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927118207     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486401.001     Document Type: Chapter

References (102)

1. Abaev, Vasilii I. (1964). A grammatical sketch of Ossetic. The Hague: Mouton.
2. Abdalla Ibrahim Abdalla (1973). Kadugli language and language usage. Institute of African and Asian Studies. University of Khartoum, Sudan.
3. Ahmed, R. and S. S. Agrawal (1969). Significant features in the perception of (Hindi) consonants. JASA 45: 758-63.
4. Anderson, Stephen R. (1981). Why phonology isn't 'natural'. LI 12: 493-539.
5. Anderson, Victoria B. (1997). The perception of coronals in Western Arrernte. In G. Kokkinakis et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th European conference on speech communication and technology, Vol. 1. University of Patras, Greece, 389-92.
6. Anderson, Victoria B. (2000). Giving weight to phonetic principles: The case of place of articulation in Western Arrernte. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
7. Archangeli, Diana and Douglas Pulleyblank (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Barnes, Jonathan (2002). The phonetics and phonology of positional neutralization. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
9. Baroni, Marco (2001). How do languages get crazy constraints? Phoneticallybased phonology and the evolution of the Galeata Romagnolo vowel system. UCLA Working Papers in Phonology 5: 152-78. http://home.sslmit.unibo.it/∼ baroni/research.html.
10. Beckman, Jill N. (1998). Positional Faithfulness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
11. Beddor, Patrice, Rena Krakow, and Stephanie Lindemann (2001). Patterns of perceptual compensation and their phonological consequences. In Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press, 55-78.
12. Bell, Alan (1978). Syllabic consonants. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, vol. 2, 153-201.
13. Bell, Herman (1971). The phonology of Nobiin Nubian. African Language Review 9: 115-39.
14. Boersma, Paul (1998). Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
15. Browman, Catherine P. and Louis Goldstein (1990). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In John Kingston and Mary Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 341-76.
16. Calabrese, Andrea (1995). A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures. LI 26: 373-463.
17. Casali, Roderic (1997). Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowel goes? Lg 73: 493-533.
18. Chitoran, Ioanna, Louis Goldstein and Dani Byrd (2002). Gestural overlap and recoverability: Articulatory evidence from Georgian. In Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 419-48.
19. Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
20. Crothers, John (1978). Typology and universals of vowel systems. In Joseph H. Greenberg et al. (eds.), Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, vol. 2, 93-152.
21. De Lacy, Paul (2002). The formal expression of markedness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
22. Donegan, Patricia (1993). On the phonetic basis of phonological change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives. London: Longman, 98-130.
23. Donegan, Patricia J. and David Stampe (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Daniel A. Dinnsen (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24. Flemming, Edward (2001). Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 18: 7-46.
25. Flemming, Edward (2002). Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.
26. Fujimura, Osamu, Marian J. Macchi, and L. Streeter (1978). Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: A cross-linguistic study. Language and Speech 21: 337-46.
27. Gafos, Adamantios (1999). The articulatory basis of locality in phonology. New York: Garland Publishers.
28. Gamkrelidze, T. V. (1978). On the correlation of stops and fricatives in a phonological system. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, vol. 2, 9-46.
29. Goldsmith, John (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
30. Grammont, Maurice. (1933). Traité de phonétique. Paris: Delagrave.
31. Greenberg, Joseph (1978). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.) Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, vol. 2, 243-80.
32. Guion, Susan G. (1996). Velar palatalization: Coarticulation, perception, and sound change. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
33. Halle, Morris and Kenneth Stevens (1971). A note on laryngeal features. In Quarterly Progress Report 101. Cambridge, MA: Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 198-213.
34. Hamilton, Philip (1996). Phonetic constraints and markedness in the phonotactics of Australian aboriginal languages. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
35. Hansson, Gunnar (2001). Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
36. Hayes, Bruce (1999). Phonetically-driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Michael Darnell, Edith Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick Newmeyer, and Kathleen Wheatly (eds.), Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, volume I: general papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 243-85.
37. Hockett, Charles F. (1955). A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
38. Hume, Elizabeth (1997). The role of perceptibility in consonant/consonant metathesis. WCCFL 17: 293-307.
39. Hume, Elizabeth andKeith Johnson (2001a), The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
40. Hume, Elizabeth andKeith Johnson (2001b). A model of the interplay of speech perception and phonology. In Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press, 3-26.
41. Hura, S., B. Lindblom, and R. Diehl (1992). On the role of perception in shaping phonological assimilation rules. Language and Speech 35. 1-2: 59-72.
42. Hyman, Larry M. (2001). The limits of phonetic determinism in phonology: *NC revisited. In Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press, 141-85.
43. Ito, Junko (1986). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
44. Ito, Junko and Armin Mester (1995). Japanese phonology. In John Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 817-38.
45. Jakobson, Roman(1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
46. Jun, Jongho (1995). Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An optimality theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
47. Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Kavitskaya, Darya (2002). Compensatory lengthening: Phonetics, phonology, diachrony. New York: Routledge.
49. Keating, Patricia A. (1985). Universal phonetics and the organization of grammars. In Victoria Fromkin (ed.), Phonetic linguistics. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 115-32.
50. Kingston, John and Randy Diehl (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Lg 70: 419-53.
51. Kirchner, Robert (1997). Contrastiveness and Faithfulness. Phonology 14: 83-111.
52. Kirchner, Robert (1998). An effort-based approach to consonant lenition, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Rutgers Optimality Archive 276, http://roa.rutgers.edu.
53. Kochetov, Alexei (2002). Production, perception, and emergent phonotactic patterns: A case of contrastive palatalization. London: Routledge.
54. Krueger, John R. (1962). Yakut manual. Bloomington: Indiana University.
55. Lehiste, Ilse (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Lindblom, Björn (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In John J. Ohala and Jeri Jaeger (eds.), Experimental phonology. Orlando: Academic Press, 13-44.
57. Lindblom, Björn (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 403-39.
58. Lindblom, Björn and Olle Engstrand (1989). In what sense is speech quantal? JPhon 17: 107-21.
59. Lombardi, Linda (in press). Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology 19: 219-51. Rutgers Optimality Archive 579.
60. Lupas, L. (1972). Phonologie du grec attique. Mouton: The Hague.
61. Lubowicz, Ania (2003). Contrast preservation in phonological mappings. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
62. Maddieson, Ian (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. McCarthy, John (in press). Comparative markedness. Theoretical Linguistics.
64. McCarthy, John and Alan Prince (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. NELS 24: 333-79.
65. Menn, Lise (1983).Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. In Brian Butterworth (ed.), Language production. London: Academic Press, vol. 2, 3-50.
66. Morelli, Frida (1999). The phonotactics and phonology of obstruent clusters in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
67. Myers, Scott (1997). Expressing phonetic naturalness in phonology. In Iggy Roca (ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 125-52.
68. Nair, Somasekharan P. (1979). Cochin dialect of Malayalam. Trivandrum: Dravidian Linguistic Association.
69. Ohala, John J. (1979). Universals of labial velars and de Saussure's chess analogy. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Copenhagen, vol. 2, 41-7.
70. Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrick, and Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 178-203.
71. Ohala, John J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer Verlag, 189-216.
72. Ohala, John J. (1990). The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. In John Kingston and Mary Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258-75.
73. Ohala, John J. and Carol Riordan (1979). Passive vocal tract enlargement during voiced stops. In J. J. Wolf and D. H. Klatt (eds.), Speech communication papers. New York: Acoustical Society of America, 89-92.
74. Padgett, Jaye (2001). Contrast dispersion and Russian palatalization. In Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press, 187-218.
75. Passy, Paul (1890). Etude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux. Paris: Firmin-Didot.
76. Pater, Joe (1999). Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In Harry van der Hulst, René Kager, andWim Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 310-43.
77. Pierrehumbert, Janet (2000). The phonetic grounding of phonology. Les cahiers de l'ICP, Bulletin de la Communication Parlée, 5: 7-23.
78. Pierrehumbert, Janet (2001). Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained. Language and Cognitive Processes 16: 691-98.
79. Podesva, Robert (2000). Constraints on geminates in Buginese and Selayarese. WCCFL 19: 343-56.
80. Prince, Alan (2001). Invariance under re-ranking. Talk given at WCCFL XX, University of Southern California, 24 February 2001. http://ling.rutgers.edu/gamma/talks/WCCFL2001.pdf
81. Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Rutgers Optimality Archive 537, http://roa.rutgers.edu/.
82. Rajaram, S. (1972). Tamil phonetic reader Mysore: CIIL.
83. Smith, Caroline (1992). The temporal organization of vowel and consonant gestures. PhD dissertation, Yale University.
84. Smith, Neilson (1973). The acquisition of phonology: A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Smolensky, Paul (1993). Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Rutgers Optimality Archive 537, http://roa.rutgers.edu/.
86. Stampe, David (1973). A dissertation on natural phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago. Distributed 1979 by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
87. Steriade, Donca (1995). Positional neutralization. Ms., Department of Linguistics, UCLA.http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/steriade/papers/PositionalNeutralization. pdf.
88. Steriade, Donca (1999). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. In Matthew Gordon (ed.), Papers in Phonology 3. (UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 2) Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, UCLA, 25-146. http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/steriade/papers/phoneticsinphonology.pdf.
89. Steriade, Donca (2001). Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. In Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology. New York: Academic Press, 219-50.
90. Stevens, Kenneth N. (1972). The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatoryacoustic data. In P. B. Denes and E. E. David, Jr (eds.), Human communication, a unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 51-66.
91. Stevens, Kenneth N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. JPhan 17: 3-46.
92. Stevens, Kenneth N. and S. Jay Keyser (1989). Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Lg 65: 81-106.
93. Suomi, Kari (1983). Palatal vowel harmony: A perceptually-motivated phenomenon? Nordic Journal of Linguistics 6: 1-35.
94. Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. (1938). Grundzüge der Phonologie. (Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague, 7) Prague: Cercle linguistique de Prague.
95. van Driem, George (1987). A grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
96. Wells, John (1982). Accents of English I: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97. Werner, Roland (1987). Grammatik des Nobiin. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
98. Westbury, John (1979). Aspects of the temporal control of voicing in consonant clusters in English. (Texas Linguistic Forum, 14) Austin, TX: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Texas, Austin.
99. Westbury, John and Patricia Keating (1986). On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. JL 22: 145-66.
100. Williams, T. Edward and V. Y. Jayapaul (1977). Udaiyar dialect of Tamil. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.
101. Wright, Richard (1996). Consonant clusters and cue preservation in Tsou. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
102. Zhang, Jie (2001). The contrast-specificity of positional prominence-evidence from diphthong distribution. Paper presented at the 75th annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Washington, DC.