Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: Evidence from English and Catalan

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 272-288

  Davidson, Lisa ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952551085     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Albright A. Feature-based generalisation as a source of gradient acceptability. Phonology 2009, 26:9-41.
2. Anttila A. Deriving variation from grammar. Variation, change, and phonological theory 1997, 35-68. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. F. Hinskens, R. Hout, W.L. Wetzel (Eds.).
3. Baayen R.H. Probabilistic approaches to morphology. Probabilistic linguistics 2003, 229-287. MIT Press, Cambridge. R. Bod, J. Hay, S. Jannedy (Eds.).
4. Bailey T.M., Hahn U. Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods?. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 44:568-591.
5. Berent I., Steriade D., Lennertz T., Vaknin V. What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition 2007, 104:591-630.
6. Blevins J. Evolutionary phonology 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Bochner J., Snell K., MacKenzie D. Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearning and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 84(2):493-500.
8. Bonet E., Lloret R.M. Fonologia Catalana 1998, Editorial Ariel, Barcelona.
9. Bradlow A., Bent T. The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002, 112:272-284.
10. Broselow E., Chen S., Wang C. The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1998, 20:261-280.
11. Broselow E., Finer D. Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research 1991, 7(1):35-59.
12. Browman C., Goldstein L. Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Bulletin de la Communication Parleé 2001, 5:25-34.
13. Bybee J. Phonology and language use 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Byrd D., Saltzman E. Speech production. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks 2002, 1072-1076. MIT Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed. M. Arbib (Ed.).
15. Carbonell J.F., Llisterri J. Catalan. Handbook of the international phonetic association: A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet 1999, 61-65. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Chitoran I., Goldstein L., Byrd D. Gestural overlap and recoverability: Articulatory evidence from Georgian. Papers in laboratory phonology VII 2002, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. N. Warner, C. Gusshoven (Eds.).
17. CÔté, M.-H. (2000). Consonant cluster phonotactics: A perceptual approach. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
18. Davidson L. Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2005, 19(6/7):619-633.
19. Davidson L. Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics 2006, 34(1):104-137.
20. Davidson L. Phonotactics and articulatory coordination interact in phonology: Evidence from non-native production. Cognitive Science 2006, 30(5):837-862.
21. Davidson L. Schwa elision in fast speech: Segmental deletion or gestural overlap?. Phonetica 2006, 63(2-3):79-112.
22. Davidson L. The relationship between the perception of non-native phonotactics and loanword adaptation. Phonology 2007, 24(2):261-286.
23. Davidson L., Jusczyk P., Smolensky P. The initial and final states: Theoretical implications and experimental explorations of richness of the base. Fixing Priorities: Constraints in Phonological Acquisition 2004, 321-368. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R. Kager, W. Zonneveld, J. Pater (Eds.).
24. Dohlus K. Phonetics or phonology: Asymmetries in loanword adaptations-French and German mid front rounded vowels in Japanese. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 2005, 42:117-135.
25. Dorman M., Studdert-Kennedy M., Raphael L. Stop-consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context dependent cues. Perception & Psychophysics 1977, 22:109-122.
26. Dupoux E., Kakehi K., Hirose Y., Pallier C., Mehler J. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1568-1578.
27. Eckman F., Iverson G. Sonority and markedness among onset clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Second Language Research 1993, 9:234-252.
28. Fleischhacker, H. (2005). Similarity in phonology: Evidence from Reduplication and Loan Adaptation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles.
29. Flemming E., Johnson S. Rosa's roses: Reduced vowels in American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2007, 37(1):83-96.
30. Gick B., Wilson I., Koch K., Cook C. Language-specific articulatory settings: Evidence from inter-utterance rest position. Phonetica 2004, 61:220-233.
31. Goldrick M. Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51(4):586-603.
32. Goldstein L., Pouplier M., Chen L., Saltzman E., Byrd D. Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition 2007, 103:386-412.
33. Greenberg J., Jenkins J. Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word 1964, 20:157-172.
34. Hallé P., Segui J., Frauenfelder U., Meunier C. Processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(2):592-608.
35. Hansen J. Developmental sequences in the acquisition of English L2 syllable codas. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2004, 26:85-124.
36. Haunz C. Grammatical and non-grammatical factors in loanword adaptation. Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences 2003, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. M.J. Solé, D. Recasens, J. Romero (Eds.).
37. Hayes B. Phonetically-driven phonology: The role of optimality theory and inductive grounding. Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, volume I: General papers 1999, 243-285. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
38. Phonetically-based phonology 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, D. Steriade (Eds.).
39. Hayes, B., & Wilson, C. (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry.
40. Henderson J., Repp B. Is a stop consonant released when followed by another stop consonant?. Phonetica 1982, 39:71-82.
41. Hualde J.I. Catalan 1992, Routledge, London.
42. Hyman L. The limits of phonetic determinism in phonology: NC revisited. The role of speech perception in phonology 2001, Academic Press, New York. E. Hume, K. Johnson (Eds.).
43. Jongman A., Wayland R., Wong S. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 108(3):1252-1263.
44. Kang Y. Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 2003, 20:219-273.
45. Kawahara S. A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: The case of [+voice] in Japanese. Language 2006, 82(3):536-574.
46. Kewley-Port D. Time-varying features as correlates of place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1983, 73(1):322-334.
47. Maniwa K., Jongman A., Wade T. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 123(2):1114-1125.
48. Mattingly I. Phonetic representation is speech synthesis by rule. The cognitive representation of speech 1981, North-Holland, Amsterdam. T. Myers, J. Laver, J. Anderson (Eds.).
49. McCarthy J., Prince A. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. Proceedings of the 24th North East Linguistics Society 1994, Cascadilla Press, Somerville. M. Gonzales (Ed.).
50. Miao, R. (2005). Loanword adaptation in Mandarin Chinese: Perceptual, phonological and sociolinguistic factors. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
51. Mielke J. The diachronic influence of perception: Experimental evidence from Turkish. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 2003, 29:557-567.
52. Miller G., Nicely P. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1955, 27(2):338-352.
53. Nagy N., Reynolds W. Optimality theory and variable word-final deletion in Faeter. Language Variation and Change 1997, 9:37-55.
54. Ohala J. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. The production of speech 1983, Springer-Verlag, New York. P. MacNeilage (Ed.).
55. Ohala J. Speech aerodynamics. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics 1994, Vol. 8:4144-4148. Pergamon Press, New York.
56. Ohala J., Kawasaki-Fukumori H. Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. Language and its ecology 1997, 343-365. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. S. Eliasson, E.H. Jahr (Eds.).
57. Ohde R.N., Stevens K. Effect of burst amplitude on the perception of stop consonant place of articulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1983, 74:706-714.
58. Peperkamp S., Dupoux E. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: The role of perception. Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences 2003, 367-370. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona. M.J. Solé, D. Recasens, J. Romero (Eds.).
59. Recasens D. Fonètica i fonologia 1993, Enciclopèdia Catalana, Barcelona.
60. Recasens D., Espinosa A. Dispersion and variability of Catalan vowels. Speech Communication 2006, 48(6):645-666.
61. Scholes R. Phonotactic Grammaticality 1966, Mouton, The Hague.
62. Silverman D. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 1992, 9:289-328.
63. Skousen R. Analogical modeling of language 1989, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
64. Smith J. Source similarity in loanword adaptation: Correspondence theory and the posited source-language representation. Phonological Argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation 2008, Equinox, London. S. Parker (Ed.).
65. Smits R., ten Bosch L., Collier R. Evaluation of various sets of acoustic cues for the perception of prevocalic stop consonants. I. Perception experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996, 100(6):3852-3864.
66. Steriade D. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers in Phonology 1999, 3:25-146.
67. Steriade, D. (1999b). The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. Unpublished manuscript.
68. Steriade D. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. The role of speech perception phenomena in phonology 2003, Academic Press, San Diego. E. Hume, K. Johnson (Eds.).
69. Stevens K. Acoustic phonetics 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
70. Stevens K., Blumstein S. Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1978, 64(5):1358-1368.
71. Stevens K., Blumstein S., Glicksman L., Burton M., Kurowski K. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91(5):2979-3000.
72. Uchanski R., Choi S., Braida L., Reed C., Durlach N. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996, 39:494-509.
73. Ussishkin A., Wedel A. Gestural motor programs and the nature of phonotactic restrictions: Evidence from loanword phonology. WCCFL 2003, 22:505-518.
74. Vendelin I., Peperkamp S. The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua 2006, 116(7):996-1007.
75. Wang M.D., Bilger R.C. Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1973, 54:1248-1266.
76. Weinberger S. Functional and phonetic constraints on second language phonology. First and second language phonology 1994, 283-302. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego. M. Yavas (Ed.).
77. Westbury J., Keating P. On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics 1986, 22:145-166.
78. Wheeler M. Phonology of Catalan 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
79. Wilson C. Consonant cluster neutralisation and targeted constraints. Phonology 2001, 18:147-197.
80. Wilson C. Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:945-982.
81. Wright, R. (1996). Consonant clusters and cue preservation in Tsou. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
82. Wright R. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. Phonetically based phonology 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, D. Steriade (Eds.).
83. Yip M. The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology. Lingua 2006, 116(7):950-975.
84. Young-Scholten M., Akita M., Cross N. Focus on form in phonology: Orthographic exposure as a promoter of epenthesis. Pragmatics and pedagogy, Vol. 2: The proceedings of the 3rd pacific second language research forum 1999, 227-233. Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo.
85. Zuraw K. The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: Corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog infixation. Language 2007, 83(2):277-316.