Harmonic Grammar with linear programming: From linear systems to linguistic typology

Phonology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 77-117

  Potts, Christopher ^a   Pater, Joe ^b   Jesney, Karen ^b   Bhatt, Rajesh ^b   Becker, Michael ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953705933     PISSN: 09526757     EISSN: 14698188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952675710000047     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Albright, Adam, Giorgio Magri & Jennifer Michaels (2008). Modeling doubly marked lags with a split additive model. In Harvey Chan, Heather Jacob & Enkeleida Kapia (eds.) Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville: Cascadilla. 36-47
2. Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
3. Baković, Eric (2000). Harmony, dominance, and control. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University
4. Bavin Woock, Edith & Michael Noonan (1979). Vowel harmony in Lango. CLS 15. 20-29
5. Bazaraa, Mokhtar S., John J. Jarvis & Hanif D. Sherali (2005). Linear programming and network flows. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
6. Becker, Michael & Joe Pater (2007). OT-Help user guide. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 36. 1-12
7. Becker, Michael, Joe Pater & Christopher Potts (2007). OT-Help 1.2. Software available at http://web.linguist.umass.edu/OTHelp/
8. Beckman, Jill N. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14. 1-46
9. Beckman, Jill N. (1998). Positional faithfulness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
10. Boersma, Paul & Joe Pater (2008). Convergence properties of a gradual learning algorithm for Harmonic Grammar. Available as ROA-970 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive
11. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.12). http://www.praat.org/
12. Casali, Roderic F. (1996). Resolving hiatus. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
13. Chvátal, Vašek (1983). Linear programming. New York: Freeman
14. Coetzee, Andries & Joe Pater (in press). The place of variation in phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.) The handbook of phonological theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell
15. Cormen, Thomas H., Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest & Clifford Stein (2001). Introduction to algorithms. 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
16. Dantzig, George B. (1982). Reminiscences about the origins of linear programming. Operations Research Letters 1. 43-48
17. Davis, Stuart (1995). Emphasis spread in Arabic and Grounded Phonology. LI 26. 465-498
18. Dresher, B. Elan & Jonathan D. Kaye (1990). A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34. 137-195
19. Goldsmith, John A. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell
20. Goldsmith, John A. (1991). Phonology as an intelligent system. In Donna Jo Napoli & Judy Anne Kegl (eds.) Bridges between psychology and linguistics : a Swarthmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 247-268
21. Goldsmith, John A. (1993). Introduction. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.) The last phonological rule : reflections on constraints and derivations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1-20
22. Goldsmith, John A. (1999). Introduction. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.) Phonological theory: the essential readings. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. 1-16
23. Goldwater, Sharon & Mark Johnson (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a Maximum Entropy model. In Jennifer Spenador, Anders Eriksson & Östen Dahl (eds.) Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory. Stockholm: Stockholm University. 111-120
24. Hayes, Bruce, Kie Zuraw, Péter Siptár & Zsuzsa Cziráky Londe (2008). Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Ms, University of California, Los Angeles
25. Hyman, Larry M. (2002). Is there a right-to-left bias in vowel harmony? Ms, University of California, Berkeley
26. Ito, Junko & Armin Mester (2003). Japanese morphophonemics: markedness and word structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
27. Itô, Junko, Armin Mester & Jaye Padgett (1995). Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. LI 26. 571-613
28. Jäger, Gerhard (2007). Maximum entropy models and Stochastic Optimality Theory. In Annie Zaenen, Jane Simpson, Tracy Holloway King, Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling & Chris Manning (eds.) Architectures, rules, and preferences : variations on themes by Joan W. Bresnan. Stanford: CSLI. 467-479
29. Johnson, Mark (2002). Optimality-theoretic Lexical Functional Grammar. In Paola Merlo & Suzanne Stevenson (eds.) The lexical basis of sentence processing : formal, computational and experimental issues. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 59-73
30. Jurgec, Peter (2009). Autosegmental spreading is a binary relation. Ms, University of Tromsø
31. Kager, René (2005). Rhythmic licensing: an extended typology. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Phonology. Seoul: The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea. 5-31
32. Kaplan, Aaron F. (2008). Noniterativity is an emergent property of grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz
33. Kelkar, Ashok R. (1968). Studies in Hindi-Urdu. Vol. 1: Introduction and word phonology. Poona: Deccan College
34. Keller, Frank (2000). Gradience in grammar: experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh
35. Keller, Frank (2006). Linear optimality theory as a model of gradience in grammar. In Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Ralf Vogel & Matthias Schlesewsky (eds.) Gradience in grammar : generative perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 270-287
36. Legendre, Géraldine, Yoshiro Miyata & Paul Smolensky (1990a). Harmonic Grammar: a formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: theoretical foundations. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 388-395
37. Legendre, Géraldine, Antonella Sorace & Paul Smolensky (2006). The Optimality Theory-Harmonic Grammar connection. In Smolensky & Legendre (2006: vol. 2). 339-402
38. Lombardi, Linda (1999). Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. NLLT 17. 267-302
39. López, Marco & Georg Still (2007). Semi-infinite programming. European Journal of Operations Research 180. 491-518
40. McCarthy, John J. (1997). Process-specific constraints in optimality theory. LI 28. 231-251
41. McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75-138
42. McCarthy, John J. (2006). Restraint of analysis. In Eric Baković, Junko Ito & John J. McCarthy (eds.) Wondering at the natural fecundity of things : essays in honor of Alan Prince. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center. 195-219
43. McCarthy, John J. (2007). Hidden generalizations: phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox
44. McCarthy, John J. (2009). Harmony in Harmonic Serialism. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-1009 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive
45. McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince (1993). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. 79-153
46. Noonan, Michael (1992). A grammar of Lango. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
47. Okello, Jenny (1975). Some phonological and morphological processes in Lango. PhD dissertation, Indiana University
48. Pater, Joe (2008). Gradual learning and convergence. LI 39. 334-345
49. Pater, Joe (2009a). Review of Smolensky & Legendre (2006). Phonology 26. 217-226
50. Pater, Joe (2009b). Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33. 999-1035
51. Pater, Joe (to appear). Serial Harmonic Grammar and Berber syllabification. In Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya & Mariko Sugahara (eds.) Prosody matters: essays in honor of Elisabeth O. Selkirk. London: Equinox
52. Poser, William J. (1982). Phonological representation and action-at-a-distance. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part 2. Dordrecht: Foris. 121-158
53. Potts, Christopher, Michael Becker, Rajesh Bhatt & Joe Pater (2007). HaLP: Harmonic Grammar with linear programming. Version 2. Software available at http://web.linguist.umass.edu/halp/
54. Prince, Alan (2002). Entailed ranking arguments. Ms, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-500 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive
55. Prince, Alan (2003). Anything goes. In Takeru Honma, Masao Okazaki, Toshiyuki Tabata & Shin-ichi Tanaka (eds.) A new century of phonology and phonological theory: a Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. 66-90
56. Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky (1997). Optimality: from neural networks to Universal Grammar. Science 275. 1604-1610
57. Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell
58. Pruitt, Kathryn (2008). Iterative foot optimization and locality in rhythmic word stress. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
59. Riggle, Jason (2004a). Generation, recognition, and learning in finite-state Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
60. Riggle, Jason (2004b). Generation, recognition and ranking with compiled OT grammars. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston
61. Smolensky, Paul (2006). Optimality in phonology II: harmonic completeness, local constraint conjunction, and feature domain markedness. In Smolensky & Legendre (2006: vol. 2). 27-160
62. Smolensky, Paul & Géraldine Legendre (eds.) (2006). The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
63. Tesar, Bruce & Paul Smolensky (1998a). Learnability in Optimality Theory. LI 29. 229-268
64. Tesar, Bruce & Paul Smolensky (1998b). Learning Optimality-Theoretic grammars. Lingua 106. 161-196
65. Walker, Rachel (2001). Positional markedness in vowel harmony. In Caroline Féry, Antony Dubach Green & Ruben van de Vijver (eds.) Proceedings of HILP 5. Potsdam: University of Potsdam. 212-232
66. Walker, Rachel (2005). Weak triggers in vowel harmony. NLLT 23. 917-989
67. Wilson, Colin (2003). Analyzing unbounded spreading with constraints: marks, targets, and derivations. Ms, University of California, Los Angeles
68. Wilson, Colin (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30. 945-982
69. Zoll, Cheryl (1996). Parsing below the segment in a constraint-based framework. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
70. Zoll, Cheryl (1998). Positional asymmetries and licensing. Ms, MIT. Available as ROA-282 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive