An untapped resource: Treatment as a tool for revealing the nature of cognitive processes

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 539-562

  Nickels, Lyndsey ^a   Kohnen, Saskia ^a   Biedermann, Britta ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cognitive neuropsychology; Intervention; Theory; Therapy; Treatment

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COGNITIVE THERAPY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CAUSALITY; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 82755170460     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: 14640627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2011.609811     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allport, D. A., & Funnell, E. (1981). Components of the mental lexicon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B295, 397-410.
2. Badecker, W., Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Lexical morphology and its role in the writing process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 35, 205-243.
3. Badecker, W., Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1996). Lexical morphology and the two orthographic routes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 161-175.
4. Basso, A., & Marangolo, P. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychological rehabilitation: The emperor's new clothes? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(3), 219-229.
5. Best, W., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Osborne, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16, 151-168.
6. Best, W., & Nickels, L. (2000). From theory to therapy in aphasia: Where are we now and where to next? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 231-247.
7. Biedermann, B., Blanken, G., & Nickels, L. A. (2002). The representation of homophones: Evidence from remediation. Aphasiology, 16, 935-980.
8. Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2008a). Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: Does orthography matter? Cortex, 44, 683-697.
9. Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2008b). The representation of homophones: More evidence from remediation of anomia. Cortex, 44, 276-293.
10. Blanken, G. (1989). Wortfindungsstoerungen und verbales Lernen bei Aphasie-Eine Einzelfallstudie. [Wordfinding difficulties and verbal learning in aphasia-A single case study]. Neurolinguistik, 2, 107-126.
11. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 5899.
12. Byng, S., & Coltheart, M. (1986). Aphasia therapy research: Methodological requirements and illustrative results. In E. Hjelmquist & L.B. Nilsson (Eds.), Communication and handicap. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
13. Caramazza, A. (1989). Cognitive neuropsychology and rehabilitation: An unfulfilled promise? In X. Seron & G. Deloche (Eds.), Cognitive approaches in neuropsychological rehabilitation: Neuropsychology and neurolinguistics (pp. 383-398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
15. Caramazza, A., Bi, Y., Costa, A., & Miozzo, M. (2004). What determines the speed of lexical access: Homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 278-282.
16. Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27(6), 1430-1450.
17. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. (1993). For a theory of remediation of cognitive deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 3(3), 217-234.
18. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1998). More is not always better: A response to Roelofs, Meyer, & Levelt. Cognition, 69, 231-241.
19. Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91(1), 77-111.
20. Castles, A., Coltheart, A., Wilson, K., Valpied, J., & Wedgwood, J. (2009). The genesis of reading ability: What helps children learn letter-sound correspondences? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 68-88.
21. Coltheart, M., Brunsdon, R., & Nickels, L. A. (2005). Cognitive rehabilitation and its relationship to cognitive neuropsychological rehabilitation. In P.W. Halligan & D.T. Wade (Eds.), The effectiveness of rehabilitation for cognitive deficits. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22. Coltheart, M., & Byng, S. (1989). A treatment for surface dyslexia. In X. Seron & G. Deloche (Eds.), Cognitive approaches in neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 159-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Coltheart, M., & Funnell, E. (1987). Reading and writing: One lexicon or two? In A. Allport (Ed.), Language perception and production (pp. 313-339). London, UK: Academic Press.
24. Coltheart, M., Sartori, G., & Job, R. (Eds.). (1987). The cognitive neuropsychology of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801-838.
26. De Partz, M.-P. (1986). Re-education of a deep dyslexic patient: Rationale of the method and results. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 149-177.
27. De Partz, M.-P., Gracefa, M., Seron, X., & Pillon, A. (1999). Apprentissage de formes orthographiques chez un patient aphasique sévere [Treatment of orthographic forms in a severely aphasic patient]. In P. Azouvi, D. Perrier, & M. Van der Linden (Eds.), La rééeducation en neuropsychologie: É tudes de cas [Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: Case studies] (pp. 71-94). Marseille, France: Solal.
28. Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. (1996). Human cognition neuropsychology: A textbook with readings. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Faroqi-Shah, Y. (2008). A comparison of two theoretically driven treatments for verb inflection deficits in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 46, 3088-3100.
30. Fillingham, J. K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2005a). Further explorations and an over-view of errorless and errorful therapy for aphasic wordfinding difficulties: The number of naming attempts during therapy affects outcome. Aphasiology, 19, 597-614.
31. Fillingham, J. K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2005b). Treatment of anomia using errorless versus errorful learning: Are frontal executive skills and feedback important? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40, 505-523.
32. Fillingham, J. K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). The treatment of anomia using errorless learning. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16, 129-154.
33. Folk, J. R., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2002). The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What's the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 653-671.
34. Foygel, D., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 182-216.
35. Hebb, D. O. (1961). The organization of behaviour: A neuropsychological theory. Stimulus and response-and what occurs in the brain in the interval between them. New York, NY: Science Editions.
36. Hillis, A. E. (1993). The role of models of language processing in rehabilitation of language impairments. Aphasiology, 7(1), 5-26.
37. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1994). Theories of lexical processing and rehabilitation of lexical deficits. In G. Riddoch & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology & cognitive rehabilitation. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Converging evidence for the interaction of semantic and sublexical phonological information in accessing lexical representations for spoken output. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 187-227.
39. Hillis, A., & Heidler, J. (2005). Contributions and limitations of the cognitive neuropsychological approach to treatment: Illustrations from studies of reading and spelling therapy. Aphasiology, 19, 985-993.
40. Howard, D. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychology and aphasia therapy: The case of word retrieval. In I. Papathanasiou (Ed.), Acquired neurogeniccommunication disorders: A clinical perspective. London, UK: Whurr.
41. Howard, D., & Hatfield, F. M. (1987). Aphasia therapy: Historical and contemporary issues. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Howard, D., Hickin, J., Redmond, T., Clark, P., & Best, W. (2006). Re-visiting "semantic facilitation" of word retrieval for people with aphasia: Facilitation yes but semantic no. Cortex, 42, 946-962.
43. Jackson, N., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Routes to reading success and failure. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
44. Jescheniak, J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 20(4), 824-843.
45. Jescheniak, J. D., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: Comments on Caramazza, Costa, et al. (2001) and new experimental data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 432-438.
46. Kohnen, S., Nickels, N., Coltheart, M., & Brunsdon, R. (2008). Predicting generalization in the training of irregular-word spelling: Treating lexical spelling deficits in a child. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(3), 343-375.
47. Laine, M., & Martin, N. (1996). Lexical retrieval deficit in picture naming: Implications for word production models. Brain and Language, 53, 283-314.
48. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
49. Lorenz, A., & Nickels, L. (2007). Orthographic cueing in anomic aphasia: How does it work? Aphasiology, 21(6), 670-686.
50. Martin, N., Fink, R., Laine, M., & Ayala, J. (2004). Immediate and short-term effects of contextual priming on word retrieval. Aphasiology, 18, 867-898.
51. Martin, P. I., Naeser, M. A., Theoret, H., Tormos, J. M., Nicholas, M., Kurland, J., et al. (2004). Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 25(2), 181-191.
52. Mason, C., Nickels, L., McDonald, B., Moses, M., Makin, K., & Taylor, C. (2011). Treatment of word retrieval impairments in aphasia: Evaluation of a selfadministered home programme using personallychosen words. Aphasiology, 25, 245-268.
53. McClelland, J., Thomas, A. G., McCandliss, B., & Fiez, J. (1999). Understanding failures of learning: Hebbian learning, competition for representational space, and some preliminary data. Progress in Brain Research, 121, 75-80.
54. McCloskey, M., Macaruso, P., & Rapp, B. (2006). Grapheme-to-lexeme feedback in the spelling system: Evidence from a dysgraphic patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 278-307.
55. Mitchum, C. C., & Berndt, R. S. (1995). The cognitive neuropsychological approach to treatment of language disorders. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 1-16.
56. Monsell, S. (1987). On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, & W. Prinz (Eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading and writing (pp. 273-311). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Morton, J. (2007). Understanding developmental disorders. A causal modelling approach. London, UK: Blackwell.
58. Nickels, L. (1992). The autocue? Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9(2), 155-182.
59. Nickels, L., Best, W., & Howard, D. (2012). Heterogeneity, associations and dissociations in cognitive neuropsychology, Manuscript in preparation.
60. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
61. Rapp, B., & Kane, A. (2002). Remediation of deficits affecting different components of the spelling process. Aphasiology, 16, 439-454.
62. Sage, K., & Ellis, A. W. (2006). Using orthographic neighbours to treat a case of graphemic buffer disorder. Aphasiology, 20(9/10/11), 851-870.
63. Schwartz, M. F., & Dell, G. S. (in press). Case series investigations in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology.
64. Scott, C., & Byng, S. (1989). Computer assisted remediation of a homophone comprehension disorder in surface dyslexia. Aphasiology, 3, 301-320.
65. Walker-Batson, D. (1998). Pharmacotherapy in the treatment of aphasia. In L.B. Goldstein (Ed.), Restorative neurology: Advances in pharmacotherapy for recovery after stroke. Armonk, NY: Futura.
66. Weekes, B., & Coltheart, M. (1996). Surface dyslexia and surface dysgraphia: Treatment studies and theirtheoretical implications. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13(2), 277-315.
67. Wilshire, C. E., & Coslett, H. B. (2000). Disorders of word retrieval in aphasia: Theories and potential applications. In S. E. Nadeau, L. J. Gonzalez-Rothi, & B. Crosson (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
68. Wilson, B., & Patterson, K. (1990). Rehabilitation for cognitive impairment: Does cognitive psychology apply? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 247-260.