From theory to therapy in aphasia: Where are we now and where to next?

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 231-247

  Best, Wendy ^b   Nickels, Lyndsey ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANOMIA; APHASIA; CASE REPORT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MALE; PHONETICS; PREDICTION; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; SPEECH THERAPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033934136     PISSN: 09602011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096020100389147     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Berndt, R.S., & Mitchum, C.C. (1994). Approaches to the rehabilitation of "phonological assembly": Elaborating the model of nonlexical reading. In M.J. Riddoch & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
2. Best, W. (1996). When racquets are baskets but baskets are biscuits, where do the words come from? A single case study of formal paraphasic errors in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 443-480.
3. Best, W., Howard, D., Bruce, C., & Gatehouse, C. (1997). A treatment for anomia; combining semantics, phonology and orthography. In S. Chiat, J. Marshall, & J. Law (Eds.), Language disorders in children and adults, psycholinguistic approaches to therapy. (pp. 102-129). London: Whurr.
4. Bruce, C. (1996). Sound effects: A new investigation of phonemic cues in aphasia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University College London.
5. Bruce, C., & Howard, D. (1987). Computer generated cues: An effective aid for naming in aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 22, 191-201.
6. Bruce, C. & Howard, D. (1988). Why don't Broca's aphasics cue themselves? An investigation of phonemic cueing and tip-of-the-tongue information. Neuropsychologia, 26, 253-264.
7. Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Byng, S., & Coltheart, M. (1986). Aphasia therapy research: Methodology requirements and illustrative results. In E. Hjelmquist & L.-G. Nilsson (Eds.), Communication and handicap: Aspects of psychological compensation and technical aids. New York: North Holland Elsevier Science.
9. Coltheart, M., & Byng, S. (1989). A treatment for surface dyslexia. In X. Seron & G. Deloche (Eds.), Cognitive approaches in neuropsychological rehabilitation. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
10. De Partz, M-P. (1986). Reeducation of a deep dyslexic patient: Rationale of the method and results. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 149-177.
11. Hillis, A.E., & Caramazza, A. (1994). Theories of lexical processing and rehabilitation of lexical deficits. In M.J. Riddoch & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
12. Howard, D. (1986). Beyond randomised controlled trials: The case for effective case studies of the effects of treatment in aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, 89-102.
13. Howard, D., & Harding, D. (1998). Self-cueing of word retrieval by a woman with aphasia: Why a letter board works. Aphasiology, 12, (4/5), 399-420.
14. Howard, D., Patterson, K.E., Franklin, S., Orchard-Lisle, V., & Morton, J. (1985). The treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia: A comparison of two therapy methods. Brain, 108, 817-829.
15. Howard, D., & Hatfield, M.H. (1987). Aphasia therapy. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
16. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic Assessment of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
17. Marshall, J., Pound, C., White-Thomson, M., & Pring, T. (1990). The use of picture/word matching tasks to assist word retrieval in aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 4, 167-84.
18. Miceli, G., Amitrano, A., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The treatment of anomia resulting from output lexical damage: Analysis of two cases. Brain & Language, 52, 150-174.
19. Mitchum, C.C., & Berndt, R.S. (1991). Diagnosis and treatment of "phonological assembly" in acquired dyslexia: An illustration of the cognitive neuropsychological approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6, 103-137.
20. Nickels, L.A. (1992). The autocue? Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 155-182.
21. Nickels, L.A. (1995). Reading too little into reading? Strategies in the rehabilitation of acquired dyslexia. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 37-50.
22. Nickels, L., & Best, W. (1996a). Therapy for naming disorders (Part 1): Principles, puzzles and progress, Aphasiology, 10, 21-47.
23. Nickels, L., & Best, W. (1996b). Therapy for naming disorders (Part II): Specifics, surprises and suggestions, Aphasiology, 10, 109-136.
24. Schwartz, M.F., Fink, R.B., & Saffran, E.M. (1995). The modular treatment of agrammatism. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 93-127.
25. Weekes, B., & Coltheart, M. (1996). Surface dyslexia and surface dysgraphia: Treatment studies and their theoretical implications. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 277-315.