The representation of homophones: Evidence from remediation

Aphasiology

Volumn 16, Issue 10-11, 2002, Pages 1115-1136

  Biedermann, Britta ^a,b   Blanken, Gerhard ^a,c   Nickels, Lyndsey ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANOMIA; APHASIA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CASE REPORT; CASE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HOMOPHONE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MODEL; PHONEME; SHORT COURSE THERAPY; SPEECH; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH THERAPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0036812147     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030244000545     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-Rom]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania/Philadelphia, PA.
2. Badecker, W., Miozzo, M., & Zanuttini, R. (1995). The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition, 57, 193-216.
3. Bierwisch, M., & Schreuder, R. (1992). From lexical concepts to lexical items. Cognition, 42, 23-60.
4. Blanken, G. (1989). Wortfindungsstörungen und verbales Lernen bei Aphasie - Eine Einzelfallstudie. Neurolinguistik, 2, 107-126.
5. Blanken, G. (1996). Materialien zur Neurolinguistischen Aphasiediagnostik. Auditives und Visuelles Sprachverständnis: Wortbedeutungen. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag.
6. Blanken, G., Dittmann, J., & Wallesch, C.-W. (in press). Parallel or serial activation of word forms in speech production? Neurolinguistic evidence from an aphasic patient. Neuroscience Letters.
7. Blanken, G., Döppler, R., Dittmann, J., & Wallesch, C.-W. (1988). Die Freiburger Funktionenvergleich-sprüfung [Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Functions]. Freiburg University (experimental version).
8. Blanken, G., & Kulke, F. (in press). Die Verarbeitung von Genusinformation bei schwerer Aphasie. Eine neurolinguistische Studie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Sprachproduktion.
9. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
10. Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27(6), 1430-1450.
11. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A.E. (1991). Lexical organisation of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature, 349, 788-790.
12. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the 'tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-364.
13. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1998). More is not always better: A response to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt. Cognition, 60, 231-241.
14. Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
15. Dell, G.S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349.
16. Dell, G.S., Schwartz, M.F., Martin, N., Saffran, E., & Gagnon, D.A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
17. Druks, J., & Masterson, J. (1999). An object and action naming battery. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
18. Henaff Gonon, M.A., Bruckert, R., & Michel, F. (1989). Lexicalization in an anomic patient. Neuropsychologia, 27, 391-407.
19. Hickin, J., Best, W., Herbert, R., Howard, D., & Osborne, F. (2002). Phonological therapy for word-finding difficulties: A re-evaluation. Aphasiology, 16, 000-000.
20. Howard, D., & Patterson, K.E. (1992). Pyramids and Palm Tress. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
21. Howard, D., Patterson, K.E., Franklin, S., Orchard-Lisle, V., & Morton, J. (1985a). The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 49-80.
22. Howard, D., Patterson, K.E., Franklin, S., Orchard-Lisle, V., & Morton, J. (1985b). The treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia: A comparison of two therapy methods. Brain, 108, 817-829.
23. Huber, W., Poeck, K.-J., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Der Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
24. Jescheniak, J.D., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824-843.
25. Jescheniak, J.D., Levelt, W.J.M., & Meyer, A.S. (in press). Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production. Evidence from the production of homophones in Dutch and German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.
26. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
27. Kempen, G., & Huijbers, R. (1983). The lexicalisation process in sentence production and naming: Indirect elections of words. Cognition, 14, 185-209.
28. Kulke, F., & Blanken, G. (2001). Phonological and syntactic influences on semantic misnamings in aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 3-15.
29. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
30. Levelt, W.J.M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223-232.
31. Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
32. Miceli, G., Amitrano, A., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The treatment of anomia resulting from output lexical damage: Analysis of two cases. Brain and Language, 52, 150-174.
33. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1997). On knowing the auxiliary of a verb that cannot be named: Evidence for the independence of grammatical and phonological aspects of lexical knowledge. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 160-166.
34. Morton, J., & Patterson, K. (1980). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J.C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep Dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35. Neubert, C., Rüffer, N., & Zeh-Hau, M. (1995). Neurolinguistische Aphasietherapie. Materialien. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag.
36. Nickels, L. (2001). Producing spoken words. In B. Rapp (Ed.), A Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology. New York: Psychology Press.
37. Nickels, L., & Best, W. (1996a). Therapy for naming disorders (part I): Principles, puzzles and progress. Aphasiology, 10, 21-47.
38. Nickels, L., & Best, W. (1996b). Therapy for naming disorders (part II): Specifics, surprises and suggestions. Aphasiology, 10, 109-136.
39. Pechmann, T., & Zerbst, D. (2002). The activation of word class information during speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 233-243.
40. Raymer, A.M., Thompson, C.K., Jacobs, B., & Le Grand, H.R. (1993). Phonological treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Model-based generalisation analysis. Aphasiology, 7, 27-53.
41. Robson, J., Marshall, J., Pring, T., & Chiat, S. (1998). Phonological naming therapy in jargon aphasia: Positive but paradoxical effects. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 675-686.
42. Roelofs, A., Meyer, A.S., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1998). A case of the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997). Cognition, 69, 219-230.
43. Ruoff, A. (1981). Häufigkeitswörterbuch Gesprochener Sprache. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
44. Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6: 174-214.
45. Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C.M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 787-806.
46. Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M.F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8, 314-317.