Receiving information at Korean and Taiwanese universities, industry, and GRIs

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 289-309

  Shapiro, Matthew A ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

East Asian developmental state; Information flows; Information transfer; R D collaboration; Technology spillovers; Triple helix relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655162079     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0501-z     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adams, J. D., Chiang, E. P., & Starkey, K. (2001). Industry-university cooperative research centers. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 73-86.
2. Aldrich, J. H., & Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
3. Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced econometrics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Amsden, A. (1989). Asia's next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Berger, S., & Lester, K. R. (Eds.). (2005). Global Taiwan: Building competitive strengths in the new economy. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
6. Bernstein, J. I., & Nadiri, M. I. (1988). Interindustry R&D spillovers, rates of return, and production in high-tech industries. American Economic Review, 78(2), 429-434.
7. Branscomb, L. M., & Keller, J. H. (1998). Towards a research and innovation policy. In L. M. Branscomb & J. H. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation: Creating a research and innovation policy that works. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Branstetter, L., & Sakakibara, M. (1997). Japanese research consortia: A microeconometric analysis of industrial policy. NBER Working Paper No. 6066. NBER, Cambridge.
9. Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14-26. doi: 10. 1016/j. respol. 2009. 11. 004.
10. Breznitz, D. (2005). Development, flexibility, and R&D performance in the Taiwanese IT industry-capability creation and the effects of state-industry co-evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(1), 153-187.
11. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 611-646. doi: 10. 1093/icc/dtn023.
12. Cheng, T.-J., Haggard, S., & Kang, D. (1998). Institutions and growth in Korea and Taiwan: The bureaucracy. Journal of Development Studies, 34(6), 87-111.
13. Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., & Walsh, J. (1998). Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In R. G. Noll (Ed.), Challenges to research universities. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution.
14. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
15. Dasgupta, P., & Maskin, E. (1987). The simple economics of research portfolios. The Economic Journal, 97, 581-595.
16. D'Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review, 78(5), 1133-1137.
17. David, P. A., & Foray, D. (1996). Information distribution and the growth of economically valuable knowledge: A rationale for technological infrastructure policies. In M. Teubal, D. Foray, M. Justman, & E. Zuscovitch (Eds.), Technological infrastructure policy: An international perspective (pp. 87-116). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 497-529.
19. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
20. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix innovation: Industry, university, and government in action. London: Routledge.
21. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
22. Evans, P. B. (1998). Transferable lessons? Re-examining the institutional prerequisites of East Asian economic policies. Journal of Development Studies, 34(6), 66-86.
23. Fontana, R., Guena, A., & Mireille, M. (2003). Firm size and openness: The driving forces of university-industry collaboration. A report commissioned by the OST-DTI, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton. http://www. sussex. ac. uk/Users/prff0/mainpages/home. html.
24. Fritsch, M. & Schwirten, C. (1999). Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 69-83.
25. Griliches, Z. (1998). The search for R&D spillovers. In R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Hagedoorn, J., Link, A., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567-586.
27. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2000). Universities as Research Partners, NBER Working Paper No. 7643. NBER, Cambridge.
28. Hamilton, G. G., & Biggart, N. W. (1988). Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the far east. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S52-S94.
29. Han, Y. (2001). What drives R&D alliances? Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Ph. D. Dissertation. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
30. Hsueh, L.-M., Hsu, C.-k., & Perkins, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Industrialization and the state: The changing role of government in Taiwan's economy, 1945-1998. Cambridge: Harvard Institute for International Development.
31. Hu, M.-C. (2011). Evolution of knowledge creation and diffusion: The revisit of Taiwan's Hsinchu science park. Scientometrics, 88(3), 949-977.
32. Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2009). Estimating the innovation effects of university-industry-government linkages: The case of Taiwan. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(2), 138-154.
33. Jaffe, A. B. (1998). The importance of 'Spillovers' in the policy mission of the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(2), 11-19.
34. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
35. Joly, P. B., & Mangamatin, V. (1996). Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R&D: The dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation. Research Policy, 25(6), 901-922.
36. Kim, H., & Park, Y. (2008). The impact of R&D collaboration on innovative performance in Korea: A Bayesian network approach. Scientometrics, 75(3), 535-554. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-007-1857-y.
37. Lécuyer, C. (1998). Academic science and technology in the service of industry: MIT creates a "Permeable" engineering school. AEA Papers and Proceedings: Clio and the Economic Organization of Science, 88(2), 28-33.
38. Lee, W.-Y. (2000). the role of science and technology policy in Korea's industrial development. In L. Kim & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Technology learning and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. In W. Dolfsma & L. Soete (Eds.), Understanding the dynamics of a knowledge economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
40. Manjarres-Henriquez, L., Gutierrez-Gracia, A., & Vega-Jurado, J. (2008). Coexistence of university-industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 76(3), 561-576.
41. McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4(1), 103-120.
42. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: Univeristy-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
43. Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. OECD. (2004). OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2004. Paris and Washington, D. C.: OECD.
45. OECD. (2006). Main science and technology indicators (MSTI). www. sourceoecd. org. Accessed on 24 July 2006.
46. Park, Y. C. (1990). Development lessons from Asia: The role of government in South Korea and Taiwan. American Economic Review, 80(2), 118-121.
47. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3-27.
48. Rahm, D., Kirkland, J., & Bozeman, B. (1999). University-industry R&D collaboration in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
49. Rinia, E., van Leeuwen, T., Bruins, E., van Vuren, H., & van Raan, A. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54(3), 347-362. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1016078331752.
50. Roos, D., Field, F., & Neely, J. (1998). Industry consortia. In L. M. Branscomb & J. H. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation: Creating a research and innovation policy that works. Cambridge: MIT Press.
51. Ruegg, R., & Feller, I. (2003). A toolkit for evaluating public R&D investment: Models, methods, and findings from ATP's first decade. Washington, D. C.: National Institute of Standards and Technology & U. S. Department of Commerce.
52. Sakakibara, M. (1994). Cooperative research and development: Theory and evidence on Japanese practice. Doctoral Dissertation. Harvard: Harvard University.
53. Scott, A., Steyn, G., Guena, A., Brusoni, S., & Steinmueller, E. (2001). The economic returns to basic research and the benefits of university-industry relationships: A literature review and update of findings. A report commissioned by the OST-DTI, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton. http://www. sussex. ac. uk/Users/prff0/mainpages/home. html.
54. Shapiro, M. A. (2007). The triple helix paradigm in Korea: A test for new forms of capital. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 6(3), 171-191.
55. Stiglitz, J. E., & Jayadev, A. (2010). Medicine for tomorrow: Some alternative proposals to promote socially beneficial research and development in pharmaceuticals. Journal of Generic Medicines7(3), 217-226.
56. Stiglitz, J. E., & Wallsten, S. J. (1999). Public-private technology partnerships: Promises and pitfalls. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 52-73.
57. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
58. World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. New York: World Bank, Oxford University Press.
59. Zhang, L., Glänzel, W., & Liang, L. (2009). Tracing the role of individual journals in a cross-citation network based on different indicators. Scientometrics, 81(3), 821-838. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-008-2245-y.