Public-Private Technology Partnerships: Promises and Pitfalls

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 52-73

  Stiglitz, Joseph E ^a   Wallsten, Scott J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033244404     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00027649921955155     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Science and Technology. (1998). [On-line]. Available: http://www.atp.nist.gov/atp/overview.htm.
2. Brazel, Y. (1995). Productivity change, public goods and transaction costs: Essays at the boundaries of microeconomics. In M. Perlman & M. Blaug (Eds.), Economists of the twentieth century series. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing, Limited.
3. Branscomb, L., & Keller, J. (1998). Towards a research and innovation policy. In L. Branscomb & J. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation (pp. 462-496). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Brody, R. (1996). Effective partnering: A report to Congress on federal technology partnerships. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy.
5. Clinton, W., & Gore, A. (1993). Technology for America's economic growth, a new direction to build economic strength. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
6. Cohen, L., & Noll, R. (1991). The technology pork barrel. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
7. Cohen, L., & Noll, R. (1995). Feasibility of effective public-private R & D collaboration: The case of cooperative R & D agreements. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2, 223-240.
8. Council of Economic Advisers, Executive Office of the President. (1995). Supporting research and development: The federal government's role [On-line]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/CEA/econ/html/econ-rpt.html.
9. Executive Office of the President. (1996). Technology in the national interest. Washington, DC: Author.
10. General Accounting Office. (1989). Federal research: Assessment of Small Business Innovation Research Programs (GAO/RCED-89-39). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
11. General Accounting Office. (1992). Federal research: Small business innovation research shows success but can be strengthened (GAO/RCED-92-37). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
12. General Accounting Office. (1995). Federal research: Interim report on the Small Business Innovation Research Program (GAO/RCED-95-59). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
13. General Accounting Office. (1996). Measuring performance: The Advanced Technology Program and private-sector funding (GAO/RCED-96-47). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14. Greenwald, B., Salinger, M., & Stiglitz, J. (1990, April). Imperfect capital markets and productivity growth (Rev. 1991, March). Paper presented at the NBER Conference, Vail, CO.
15. Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R & D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-47.
16. Hall, B. (1992). Investment and research and development at the firm level: Does the source of financing matter? (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4096). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17. Hall, B. (1993). R & D tax policy during the 1980s: Success or failure? In J. Poterba (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (Vol. 7). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Hill, C. (1995, June 19). Private funds are unlikely to replace cuts in public funds for R & D in the U.S. (Available from the Institute of Public Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA).
19. Hill, C. (1998). The advanced Technology Program: Opportunities for enhancement. In L. Branscomb & J. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation (pp. 143-173). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Himmelberg, C., & Petersen, B. (1994). R & D and internal finance: A panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 38-51.
21. Irwin, D., & Klenow, P. (1996). High-tech R & D subsidies: Estimating the effects of Sematech. Journal of International Economics, 40, 323-344.
22. Jaffe, A. (1998). Measurement issues. In L. Branscomb & J. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation (pp. 64-84). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Jones, C., & Williams, J. (1997). Measuring the social return to R & D (Finance and economics discussion series). Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board.
24. Lerner, J. (1996). The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR Program. (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5753). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25. Levy, D., & Terleckyj, N. (1983). Effects of government R & D on private R & D investment and productivity: A macroeconomic analysis. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 551-561.
26. Manufacturing Extension Partnership. (1998). [On-line]. Available: http://www.mep.nist.gov.
27. Masahiko, A., Murdock, K., & Okuno-Fujihara, M. (1997). Beyond the East Asian miracle: Introducing the market enhancing view. In A. Masahiko, H. Kim, & M. Okuno-Fujiwara (Eds.), The role of government in East Asian economic development: Comparative institutional analysis (pp. 1-40). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Nadiri, I. (1993). Innovations and technological spillovers. (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4423). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
29. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. (1998). Review of the research program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Fourth report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. National Institute of Science and Technology. (1996). Guidelines for economic evaluation of the Advanced Technology Program. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
31. National Science Foundation. (1998). Science and engineering indicators. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
32. Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President. (1996). Budget of the United States government. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
33. Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President. (1997). Budget of the United States government. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
34. Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President. (1998). Budget of the United States government. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35. Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles. (1998). [On-line]. Available: http://www.ta.doc.gov/pngv/introduction/intro.htm.
36. Reinganum, J. (1989). The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion. In R. Schmalen-see & Willig (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (pp. 850-908). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
37. Robson, M. (1993). Federal funding and the level of private expenditure on basic research. Southern Economic Journal, 60, 63-71.
38. Romer, P. (1993). Implementing a national technology stategy with self-organizing industry investment boards. Brookings Papers: Microeconomics, 2, 345-399.
39. Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Sematech. (1998). [On-line]. Available: http://www.sematech.org.
41. Stiglitz, J. (1988). Economics of the public sector (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
42. Stiglitz, J., & Sah, R. (1989). Technological learning, social learning and technological change. In S. Chakravarty (Ed.), The balance between industry and agriculture in economic development (pp. 285-298). New York: Macmillan.
43. Wallsten, S. (1998a). Rethinking the Small Business Innovation Research Program. In L. Branscomb & J. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Wallsten, S. (1998b). Can government-industry R & D programs increase private R & D: The case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
45. Yager, L., & Schmidt, R. (1997). The Advanced Technology Program: A case study in federal technology policy. Washington, DC: AEI Press.