Tracing the role of individual journals in a cross-citation network based on different indicators

Scientometrics

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 821-838

  Zhang, Lin ^a,b   Glänzel, Wolfgang ^b,c   Liang, Liming ^a,d  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^d HENAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956618048     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-2245-y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BATAGELJ, V., MRVAR, A. (2002), Pajek - analysis and visualization of large networks. Graph Drawing, 2265: 477-478.
2. BORGATTI, S. P. (2002), Netdraw Network Visualization. Analytic Technologies: Harward, MA.
3. BURRELL, Q. L. (2005), The use of the generalized Waring process in modelling informetric data. Scientometrics, 64 (3): 247-270.
4. GLÄNZEL, W., TELCS, A., SCHUBERT, A. (1984), Characterization by truncated moments and its application to Pearson-type distributions. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete, 66: 173-183. (Correction: Probab. Th. Rel. Fields, 74 (1987) 317).
5. GLÄNZEL, W. (1987), A Characterization Theorem Based on Truncated Moments and Its Application to Some Distribution Families. In: P. BAUER, F. KONECNY, W. WERTZ (Eds), Mathematical Statistics and Probability Vol. B, D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht-Holland, pp. 75-84.
6. GLÄNZEL, W. (1988), A Characterization of the Normal Distribution. Studia Sci. Math. Hungarica, 23 (1-2): 89-91.
7. GLÄNZEL, W. (1994), IrWin - A characterization tool for discrete distributions under Windows. In: R. DUTTER, W. GROSSMANN (Eds), Short Communications in Computational Statistics, Proceedings of COMPSTAT'94, Vienna (Austria), 22-26 August 1994, pp. 199-200.
8. GLÄNZEL, W., CZERWON, H. J. (1996), A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level, Scientometrics, 37 (2): 195-221.
9. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHOEPFLIN, U. (1999), A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing and Management 35 (1): 31-44.
10. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (2003), A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics 56 (3): 357-367.
11. IRWIN, J. O. (1975), The generalized Waring distribution. Part I, II, III. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 138: 18-31, 204-227, 374-384.
12. LEYDESDORFF, L., COZZENS, S. E., BESSELAAR, P. V. D. (1994), Tracking areas of strategic importance using scientometric journal mappings. Research Policy, 23: 217-229.
13. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2004A), Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Documentation 60 (4): 371-427.
14. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2004B), Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: graph- and factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics 60 (2): 159-180.
15. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2006), Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (5): 601-613.
16. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2007), Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (9): 1303-1319.
17. SCHUBERT, A., GLÄNZEL, W. (2006), Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics, 69 (2): 409-428.
18. SCHUBERT, A., BRAUN, T. (1993), Reference-standards for citation based assessments. Scientometrics, 26 (1): 21-35.
19. XEKALAKI, E. (1983), The univariate generalized Waring distribution in relation to accident theory - proneness, spells or contagion. Biometrics, 39 (4): 887-895.