The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model

Understanding The Dynamics Of A Knowledge Economy

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 42-76

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890735616     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845429898.00009     Document Type: Chapter

References (107)

1. Abramowitz, M. and P.A. David (1996), 'Measuring Performance of Knowledgebased Economy', in Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris: OECD, pp. 35-60.
2. Allen, P.M. (1994), 'Evolutionary Complex Systems: Models of Technology Change', in L. Leydesdorff and P. Van den Besselaar (eds), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions for Technology Studies, London/New York: Pinter, pp. 1-18.
3. Andersen, E.S (1994), Evolutionary Economics: Post-Schumpeterian Contributions, London: Pinter.
4. Aoki, M (2001), Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
5. Arrow, K.J. (1962), 'The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing', Review of Economic Studies, 29: 155-73.
6. Arthur,W.B (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Bathelt, H. (2003), 'Growth Regimes in Spatial Perspective 1: Innovation, Institutions and Social Systems', Progress in Human Geography, 27(6): 789-804.
8. Beccatini, G., M. Bellandi, G. Dei Ottati, and F. Sforzi (2003), From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
9. Biggiero, L. (1998), 'Italian Industrial Districts: A Triple Helix Pattern of Problem Solving', Industry and Higher Eductation, 12(4): 227-34.
10. Braczyk, H.-J., P. Cooke and M. Heidenreich (eds) (1998), Regional Innovation Systems, London/Bristol, PA: University College London Press.
11. Braverman, H (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital. The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, New York/London: Monthly Review Press.
12. Brusoni, S., A. Prencipe and K. Pavitt (2000), 'Knowledge Specialization and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Make?' Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 597-621.
13. Burt, R.S (1982), Toward a Structural Theory of Action, New York: Academic Press.
14. Callon, M (1998), The Laws of the Market, Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.
15. Callon, M., C. Méadel and V. Rabeharisoa (2002), 'The Economy of Qualities', Economy and Society, 31(2): 194-217.
16. Carlsson, B. (ed.) (2002), New Technological Systems in the Bio Industries-An International Study. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Freeman, C. (1988), 'Japan, a New System of Innovation', in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter, pp. 31-54.
18. Freeman, C. and C. Perez (1988), 'Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour', in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R.R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter, pp. 38-66.
19. Frenken, K (2006), Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory, Cheltenham,UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
20. Frenken, K. and L. Leydesdorff (2004), 'Scientometrics and the Evaluation of EuropeanIntegration', in. J. UlijnandT.Brown(eds),Innovation,Entrepreneurship and Culture: The Interaction between Technology, Progress and Economic Growth, Cheltenham,UKand Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 87-102.
21. Fujigaki, Y. (1998), 'Filling the Gap between Discussions on Science and Scientists' Everyday Activities: Applying the Autopoiesis System Theory to Scientific Knowledge', Social Science Information, 37(1): 5-22.
22. Galbraith, J.K (1967), The New Industrial State, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
23. Galbraith, J.R. and D.A. Nathanson (1978), Strategy Implementation: The Role of Structure and Process, St Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
24. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott and M. Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
25. Godin, B. (2006), 'The Knowledge-based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword', Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1): 17-30.
26. Godin, B. and Y. Gingras (2000), 'The Place of Universities in the System of Knowledge Production', Research Policy, 29(2): 273-8.
27. Granstrand, O (1999), The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property:Towards Intellectual Capitalism, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
28. Granstrand, O., P. Patel and K. Pavitt (1997), 'Multitechnology Corporations:Why They Have "Distributed" Rather Than "Distinctive" Core Capabilities', California Management Review, 39: 8-25.
29. Gunasekara, C. (2005), 'Reframing the Role of Universities in the Development of Regional Innovation Systems', Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1): 101-13.
30. Hall, P.A. and D.W. Soskice (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Husserl, E. ([1929] 1973), Cartesianische Meditationen Und Pariser Vorträge [Cartesian Meditations and the Paris Lectures], The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
32. Jaffe, A.B. and M.Trajtenberg (2002),Patents, Citations, and Innovations:AWindow on the Knowledge Economy, Cambridge,MA and London: MIT Press.
33. Kemp, R., J. Schot and R. Hoogma (1998), 'Regime Shifts to Sustainability through Processes of Niche Formation. The Approach of Strategic Niche Management', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(2) 175-95.
34. Kingston, W (2003), Innovation: The Creative Impulse in Human Progress, Washington, DC: Leonard R. Sugerman Press.
35. Kline, S. and N. Rosenberg (1986), 'An Overview of Innovation', in R. Landau and N. Rosenberg (eds), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 275-306.
36. Krauss, G. and H.-G. Wolff (2002), 'Technological Strengths in Mature Sectors-an Impediment of an Asset of Regional Economic Restructuring? The Case of Multimedia and Biotechnology in Baden-Württemberg', Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1): 39-50.
37. Lancaster, K.J (1979), Variety, Equity and Efficiency, New York: Columbia University Press.
38. Langford, C.H., R.D. Burch and M.W. Langford (1997), 'The "Well-stirred Reactor": Evolution of Industry-Government-University Relations in Canada', Science and Public Policy, 24(1): 21-7.
39. Larédo, P. (2003), 'Six Major Challenges Facing Public Intervention in Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation', Science and Public Policy, 30(1): 4-12.
40. Latour, B (1987), Science in Action, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
41. Lewontin, R (2000), The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
42. Leydesdorff, L. (1994), 'Epilogue', in L. Leydesdorff and P. Van den Besselaar (eds), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions for Technology Studies, London and New York: Pinter, pp. 180-92.
43. Leydesdorff, L (2000), Are EU Networks Anticipatory Systems? An Empirical and Analytical Approach, in D.M. Dubois (ed.), Computing Anticipatory Systems-Casys'99, Woodbury, NY: American Physics Institute.
44. Leydesdorff, L. (2001), A Sociological Theory of Communication: The Self-Organization of the Knowledge-Based Society, Parkland, FL: Universal Publishers: at http://www.upublish.com/books/leydesdorff.htm.
45. Leydesdorff, L. (2003), 'The Mutual Information of University-Industry-Government Relations: An Indicator of the Triplex Helix Dynamics', Scientometrics, 58(2): 445-67.
46. Leydesdorff, L. and H. Etzkowitz (1998), 'The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies', Science and Public Policy, 25(3): 195-203.
47. Leydesdorff, L. and P. Van den Besselaar (1998), 'Technological Development and Factor Substitution in a Non-Linear Model', Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 21: 173-92.
48. Li, T.-Y. and J.A. Yorke (1975), 'Period Three Implies Chaos', American Mathematical Monthly, 82: 985-92.
49. List, F (1841), The National Systems of Political Economy, London: Longman (1904 edn).
50. Luhmann, N (1984), Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
51. Luhmann, N. (1996), 'On the Scientific Context of the Concept of Communication', Social Science Information, 35(2): 257-67.
52. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988), 'Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation', in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter, pp. 349-69.
53. Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter.
54. Lundvall, B.-Å. and S. Borras (1997), The Globalising Learning Economy:Implication for Innovation Policy, Luxembourg: European Commission.
55. Mackenzie, A. (2001), 'The Technicity of Time', Time & Society, 10(2/3):235-57.
56. Malerba, F., R. Nelson, L. Orsenigo and S. Winter (1999), ' "History-Friendly"Models of Industry Evolution: The Computer Industry', Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1): 3-35.
57. Marx, K. (1848), The Communist Manifesto (translated by Samuel Moore in 1888) Harmondsworth: Penguin (1967 edn).
58. Marx, K (1857), Grundriße der Kritik der politischen Oekonomie, Moscow: Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute (1939 edn).
59. Marx, K (1867), Das Kapital I, Hamburg: Meisner.
60. Maturana, H.R. and F.J. Varela (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht: Reidel.
61. McLuhan, M (1964), Understanding Media: The Extension of Man, New York:McGraw-Hill.
62. Merton, R.K (1973), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
63. Moso, M. and M. Olazaran (2002), 'Regional Technology Policy and the Emergence of an R&D System in the Basque Country', Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1): 61-75.
64. Mowery, D.C. and N. Rosenberg (1979), 'The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: A Critical Reveiw of Some Empirical Studies', Research Policy, 8:102-53.
65. Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1982), Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-Industry Analysis, New York: Pergamon.
66. Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Nelson, R.R. (1994), 'Economic Growth via the Coevolution of Technology and Institutions', in L. Leydesdorff and P. Van den Besselaar (eds), Evolutionary Economic and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, London and New York: Pinter, pp. 21-32.
68. Nelson, R.R. (1995), 'Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change', Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1): 48-90.
69. Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1975), 'Growth Theory from an Evolutionary Perspective: The Differential Productivity Growth Puzzle', American Economic Review, 65: 338-44.
70. Nelson, R.R. and S.G.Winter (1977), 'In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation', Research Policy, 6: 35-76.
71. Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
72. Neurath, O. (1932/1933), 'Protokollsätze', Erkenntnis, 3: 204-14.
73. Noble, D (1977), America by Design, New York: Knopf.
74. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Nowotny, H., P. Scott and M. Gibbons (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity.
76. OECD (1980), Technical Change and Economic Policy, Paris: OECD.
77. OECD (1996), OECD Economic Outlook, No. 60, Paris: OECD.
78. Parsons, T (1951), The Social System, New York: The Free Press.
79. Pavitt, K. (1984), 'Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Theory and a Taxonomy', Research Policy, 13: 343-73.
80. Porter, M.E (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.
81. Rabeharisoa, V. and M. Callon (2002), 'The Involvement of Patients' Associations in Research', International Social Science Journal, 54(171): 57-65.
82. Riba-Vilanova, M. and L. Leydesdorff (2001), 'Why Catalonia Cannot be Considered as a Regional Innovation System', Scientometrics, 50(2): 215-40.
83. Rosenberg, N. (1976), 'The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices', in Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp. 108-25.
84. Rosenberg,N (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
85. Rothwell, R. and W. Zegveld (1981), Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, London: Pinter.
86. Sahal, D (1981), Patterns of Technological Innovation, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
87. Sahal, D. (1985), 'Technological Guideposts and Innovation Avenues', Research Policy, 14: 61-82.
88. Salter, W.E.G (1960), Productivity and Technical Change, New York: Cambridge University Press.
89. Saviotti, P.P (1996), Technological Evolution,Variety and the Economy, Cheltenham, UK and Brookfield, UT, USA: Edward Elgar.
90. Scharnhorst, A. (1998), 'Citation-Networks, Science Landscapes and Evolutionary Strategies', Scientometrics, 43(1): 95-106.
91. Schumpeter, J. ([1911] 1949), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92. Schumpeter, J. ([1939] 1964), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
93. Schumpeter, J (1943), Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy, London: Allen & Unwin.
94. Shinn, T. (2002), 'The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge:Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology', Social Studies of Science, 32(4): 599-614.
95. Skolnikoff, E.B (1993), The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology and the Evolution of International Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
96. Storper, M (1997), The Regional World-Territorial Development in a Global Economy, New York: Guilford Press.
97. Teubal, M (1979), On User Needs and Need Determination. Aspects of a Theory of Technological Innovation, in M.J. Baker (ed.), Industrial Innovation.Technology, Policy and Diffusion, London: Macmillan Press, pp. 266-89.
98. Ulanowicz, R.E. (1996), 'The Propensities of Evolving Systems', in E.L. Khalil and K.E. Boulding (eds), Evolution, Order and Complexity, London and New York:Routledge, pp. 217-33.
99. Urry, J (2003), Global Complexity, Cambridge: Polity.
100. Van den Belt, H. and A. Rip (1987), 'The Nelson-Winter-Dosi Model and Synthetic Dye Chemistry', in W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T.J. Pinch (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 135-58.
101. Viale, R. and S. Campodall'Orto (2002), 'An Evolutionary Triple Helix to Strengthen Academy-Industry Relations: Suggestions from European Regions', Science and Public Policy, 29(3): 154-68.
102. Wagner, C.S. and L. Leydesdorff (2003), 'Seismology as a Dynamic, Distributed Area of Scientific Research', Scientometrics, 58(1): 91-114.
103. Walsh, J.P. and T. Bayma (1996), 'Computer Networks and Scientific Work', Social Studies of Science, 26(3): 661-703.
104. Whitley, R.D (1984), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Whitley, R.D. (2001), 'National Innovation Systems', inN.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Oxford:Elsevier, pp. 10303-9.
106. Williamson, O (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.
107. Windrum, P. (1999), 'Simulation Models of Technological Innovation: A Review', American Behavioral Scientist, 42(10): 1531-50.