The impact of R&D collaboration on innovative performance in Korea: A Bayesian network approach

Scientometrics

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 535-554

  Kim, Hyukjoon ^a   Park, Yongtae ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71249125722     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1857-y     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. AHUJA, G. (2000), Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovations: a longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quaterly, 45 (3) : 425-455.
2. ANGEL, D. P. (2002), Inter-firm collaboration and technology development partnerships within US manufacturing industry, Regional Studies, 36 (4) : 333-344.
3. BALCONI, M., BRESCHI, S., LISSONI, F. (2004), Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data, Research Policy, 33 (1): 127-145.
4. BOUGRAIN, F., HAUDEVILLE, B. (2002), Innovation, collaboration, and SMEs internal research capacities, Research Policy, 31 (5) : 735-747.
5. CANTNER, U., GRAF, H. (2006), The network of innovators in Jena: an application of social network analysis, Research Policy, 35 (4): 463-480.
6. CHENG, J., GREINER, R., KELLY, J., BELL, D., LIU, W. (2002), Learning Bayesian networks from data: an information-theory based approach, Artificial Intelligence, 137 (1/2): 43-90.
7. CHOW, C. K., LIU, C. N. (1968), Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14 (3) : 462-467.
8. COWAN, R., JONARD, N., ZIMMERMANN, J.-B. (2006), Evolving networks of inventors, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16 (1/2) : 155-174.
9. COHEN, W. M., LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1989), Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D, Economic Journal, 99 (397): 569-596.
10. COHEN, W. M., LEVINTIIAL, D. A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128-152.
11. CZARNITZKL, D., LLCHT, G. (2006), Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern Germany, Economics of Transition, 14 (1): 101-131.
12. DOUGHERTY, J., KOHAVI, R., SAHAMI, M. (1995), Supervised and unsupervised discretization of continuous features, Proceedings ofICML, 1995 : 194-202.
13. EDQUIST, C. (1997), Systems of Innovation, Technologies, Institutes, and Organizations, Printer, London.
14. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (1995), The triple helix-universtty- industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development, EASST Review, 14(1): 14-19.
15. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (1997), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy, a Triple Helix of University-industry-government, Printer, London.
16. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry- government relations, Research Policy, 29 (2) : 109-123.
17. FREEMAN, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Printer, London.
18. GOYAL, S., MORGA-GONZÁLEZ, J. L. (2001), R&D networks, Rand Journal of Economics, 32 (4): 686-707.
19. GOYAL, S., JOSHI, S. (2003), Networks of collaboration in oligopoly, Games and Economic Behavior, 43 (1): 57-85.
20. HECKERMAN, D. (1997), Bayesian networks for data mining, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(1): 79-119.
21. HECKERMAN, D., MAMDANI, A., WELLMAN, M. P. (1995), Real-world applications of Bayesian networks, Communications of the ACM, 38 (3): 24-26.
22. HOLTE, R. C. (1993), Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasels, Machine Learning, 11 (1) : 63-90.
23. JANSZEN, F. H. A., DEGENAARS, G. H. (1998), A dynamic analysis of the relations between the structure and the process of National Systems of Innovation using computer simulation; the case of the Dutch biotechnological sector, Research Policy, 27 (1): 37-54.
24. KALITA, R., MANG, P. Y. (2003), Exploiting technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations, Research Policy, 32 (2) : 317-332.
25. KAMLEN, M. I., SCHWARTZ, N. L. (1982), Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. KANNEBLEY JR., S., PORTO, G. S., PAZELLO, E. T. (2005), Characteristics of Brazilian innovative firms: an empirical analysis based on PINTEC-industrial research on technological innovation, Research Policy, 34 (6): 872-893.
27. KLM, M., PARK, Y. (2004), The evolving patterns of inter-industrial knowledge structure: case of Korean manufacturing in the 1980s, Scientometrics, 61 (1) : 43-54.
28. LAURITZEN, S. L., SPIEGELHALTER, D. J. (1988), Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Seires B (Mehodological), 50 (2): 157-224.
29. LEE, K.-H., YOON, B.-S. (2005), The effects of patents on firm value: venture vs. non-venture, STEPI, Policy Research Reports 2005-08.
30. LEE, G., OH, J.-S. (2003), Analysis of characteristics of technological innovations of IT firms, KISDI, IT Industry/Market Research Series 03-02.
31. LEE, T.-L., VON TUNZELMANN, N. (2005), A dynamic analytic approach to national innovation systems: the IC industry in Taiwan, Research Policy, 34 (4): 425-140.
32. LIM, Y.-C, YANG, H.-M., CHUNG, C.-Y. (2005), A perspective of the policy development for technology based firms(venture firm), STEPI, Policy Research Reports 2005-01.
33. LUNDVALL, B. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Printer, London.
34. MOWERY, D. C, OXLEY, J. E., SILVERMAN, B. S. (1998), Technological overlap and inter-firm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm, Research Policy, 27 (5): 507-523.
35. NADKARNI, S., SHENOY, P. P. (2001), A Bayesian network approach to making inferences in causal maps, European Journal of Operational Research, 128 (3) : 479-498.
36. NEAPOLITAN, R. E. (2004), Learning Bayesian Networks, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
37. NEWMAN, M. E. J. (2001), The structure of scientific collaboration networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98 (2) : 404-409.
38. OECD (2001), Innovative Networks: Co-operation in National Innovation Systems, OECD Publications, Paris.
39. PERNER, P., TRAUTZSCH, S. (1998), Multi-interval discretization methods for decision tree learning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1451 :475-482.
40. POWELL, W. W., KOPUT, K. W., SMITH-DOERR, L. (1996), Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1): 116-145.
41. SCHERER, F. M. (1965), Firm size, market structure, opportunity and the output of patented inventions, American Economic Review, 55 (2): 1097-1125.
42. SCHERER, F. M. (1967), Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers, American Economic Review, 57 (3) : 524-531.
43. SCHERER, F. M. (1992), Schumpeter and plausible capitalism, Journal of Economic Literature, 30 (3): 1416-1433.
44. SCHERER, F. M., ROSS, D. (1990), Industrial market structure and economic performance, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
45. SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper, New York.
46. SHAN, W., WALKER, G., KOGUT, B. (1994), Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (5) : 387-394.
47. SHIN, J., LEE, W., PARK, Y. (2006), On the benchmarking method of patent-based knowledge flow structure: comparison of Korea and Taiwan with USA, Scientometrics, 69 (3): 551-574.
48. SPIEGELHALTER, D., LAURITZEN, S. (1990), Sequential updating of conditional probabilities on directed graphical structure, Networks, 20 (5) : 579-605.
49. SPIEGELHALTER, D. J., DAWTD, A. P., LAURLTZEN, S. L., COWELL, R. G. (1993), Bayesian analysis in expert systems, Statistical Science, 8 (3): 219-247.
50. STUART, T. E. (2000), Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (8): 791-811.
51. SVENSSON, R. (2006), Innovation performance and government intervention, IUI Working Paper No. 664.
52. TAN, P.-N., STEINBACH, M., KUMAR, V. (2005), Introduction to Data Mining, Addison Wesley, Boston.
53. TSAI, W. M.-H., MACMILLAN, I. C., LOW, M. B. (1991), Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets, Journal of Business Venturing, 6 (1): 9-28.
54. WANG, T.-Y., CHIEN, S.-C. (2006), Forecasting innovation performance via neural networks - a case of Taiwanese manufacturing industry, Technovation, 26 (5/6): 635-643.